Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.463
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Yustitia POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI)
Tanaya, Putu Edgar
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PIPIL DOCUMENTS LEGALITY AS PROOF OF LAND OWNERSHIP RIGHTS OWNERSHIP IN BALI Pradnyadana, Ketut Diana Rista; Tanaya, Putu Edgar
POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES Vol. 1 No. 4 (2022): OCTOBER
Publisher : Transpublika Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55047/polri.v1i4.486

Abstract

Pipil as proof of land ownership is not comparable in strength to a certificate.  Pipil is used as proof of ownership of a land based on the Customary Agrarian Law which later became the source of the formation of the National Agrarian Law which was subsequently ratified by the Basic Agrarian Law of 1960 which was reinforced by Law No. 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration.  This study aims to find certainty that there is a legal basis for using pipil as proof of ownership rights, to provide information to the public regarding the importance of registering their land with the BPN and as a material consideration for communities who have not changed their proof of land ownership rights to the National Land Agency (BPN).  The method used in this study is a normative method by studying laws and regulations and the results of research and writings from legal circles.  The main topic of discussion is the legal basis for using pipil as proof of land ownership and the factors that form the basis for why there are still people who use pipil.
PELAKSANAAN PERATURAN BUPATI GIANYAR NOMOR 57 TAHUN 2018 TENTANG MANAJEMEN DAN REKAYASA LALU LINTAS DAN ANGKUTAN JALAN SERTA PERPARKIRAN DI KAWASAN PARIWISATA UBUD Tanaya, Putu Edgar; Sarif, Asri
Jurnal Yustitia Vol 17 No 01 (2023): JURNAL YUSTITIA
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Ngurah Rai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62279/yustitia.v17i01.1059

Abstract

Along with the rapid development in the Ubud area, it must also be balanced with the developmentof accessibility that can support tourist comfort. Efforts made by the government such as providing centralparking and taking strict action against violators who still use the road as a parking lot in the Ubud tourismarea have also not been able to overcome this problem. The problems discussed in this study, namely: howis the gianyar district regulation number 57 of 2018 regarding management and engineering of traffic androad transportation and parking in the ubud tourism area and what are the inhibiting factors and effortsmade in the implementation of the gianyar district regulation number 57 of 2018 regarding managementand engineering of traffic and road transportation as well as parking in the tourism area of ubud. Theresearch used in this study is based on empirical juridical research which is also known as field research.The results of the research are that the implementation of the Gianyar Regional Regulation Number 57 of2018 has not gone well due to the many parking problems and the lack of parking facilities in the Ubudarea. Factors that influence the implementation of the Perbup are internal and external factors as well asthe efforts made by dividing the personnel of the Transportation Agency in Gianyar at several points in theUbud area. The suggestion submitted was the need for firmness from the Perbup implementing agency andvillage officials in the Ubud tourism area to help regulate parking.
Co-Authors Kereh, Heishiro Alesanro Pradnyadana, Ketut Diana Rista Sadhana, I Gede Kesuma Sarif, Asri Satya Weda Putra, Anak Agung Gede Sidartha, Ida Bagus Gede Gosala Sioe, Farrel Christian Yudi Arnawa, Anak Agung Gede