Setianingsih, Ajeng
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Perkotaan

Evaluation of Active and Passive Fire Protection Systems and Life-Saving Facilities in the Jakarta Provincial Health Office Building Hi. Sarmin, Fitrianisa; Setianingsih, Ajeng; Rafida, Neni Herlina
Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Perkotaan Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Perkotaan
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Mohammad Husni Thamrin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37012/jkmp.v5i2.2919

Abstract

Fire is a disaster with a high risk of causing casualties and material losses. World Fire is a disaster with a high risk of causing loss of life and material loss. World Fire Statistics (2022) data recorded more than 3.7 million global fires with losses of approximately USD 50 billion per year. Meanwhile, in Indonesia, there were 10,000 cases in 2021 and 1,624 cases in DKI Jakarta in 2022. This condition emphasizes the importance of fire protection systems in public facilities, including the DKI Jakarta Provincial Health Office Building. This study aims to evaluate active and passive fire protection systems, and life-saving facilities based on Ministerial Regulation No. 26 of 2008 and SNI. The method used was descriptive qualitative with observation, interviews, and document review. The results showed that the fire protection system was in place but not functioning optimally. Active protection was ineffective due to damage to the MCFA, which resulted in the inoperability of alarms, detectors, sprinklers, and hydrants. While fire extinguishers functioned but did not meet placement standards. Passive protection was generally appropriate, but there were deficiencies such as materials and partitions that were not certified fire-resistant, cracks in walls, and fire doors without smoke seals. Lifesaving facilities are relatively up to standard, although evacuation routes remain obstructed, emergency exits difficult to use, assembly points unsafe, and lighting and evacuation signs inadequate. Repairs, maintenance, and regular monitoring are recommended to ensure the safety of building occupants.
The Relationship between Individual Factors and Occupational Factors with the Risk of LBP (Low Back Pain) in Workers at the Jakarta Provincial Health Office Aprilia, Savira; Setianingsih, Ajeng; Rafida, Neni Herlina
Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Perkotaan Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Perkotaan
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Mohammad Husni Thamrin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37012/jkmp.v5i2.2920

Abstract

According to the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2023, LBP (Low Back Pain) is the number one cause of disability in the world, with 619 million sufferers in 2020 and is estimated to increase to 843 million cases in 2050. LBP is often experienced by workers due to non-ergonomic working positions, long working hours, and repetitive activities. This complaint can be caused by various factors, both identifiable and unidentifiable. This study aims to determine the relationship between individual factors (age and gender) and work factors (work position, work period, work duration, and repetition) with the incidence of LBP in employees of the DKI Jakarta Provincial Health Office in 2025. This study used a cross-sectional design with 63 respondents selected through a total sampling technique. The research instrument was a questionnaire whose validity and reliability had been tested using the Chi-Square test at the 95% level. The results of the study showed that individual factors in the form of age and gender and work factors in the form of work duration were not related to the occurrence of LBP, while work factors in the form of work position, work period, and repetitive activities were related to the occurrence of LBP. Research recommendations include efforts to maintain spinal health by paying attention to body position while working, implementing short stretches at certain hours, the 20-20-20 rule, and the preparation of formal regulations in the form of SOPs, SKPs, or Circular Letters to prevent LBP on an ongoing basis.
Evaluation of Active and Passive Fire Protection Systems and Life-Saving Facilities in the Jakarta Provincial Health Office Building Hi. Sarmin, Fitrianisa; Setianingsih, Ajeng; Rafida, Neni Herlina
Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Perkotaan Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Perkotaan
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Mohammad Husni Thamrin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37012/jkmp.v5i2.2919

Abstract

Fire is a disaster with a high risk of causing casualties and material losses. World Fire is a disaster with a high risk of causing loss of life and material loss. World Fire Statistics (2022) data recorded more than 3.7 million global fires with losses of approximately USD 50 billion per year. Meanwhile, in Indonesia, there were 10,000 cases in 2021 and 1,624 cases in DKI Jakarta in 2022. This condition emphasizes the importance of fire protection systems in public facilities, including the DKI Jakarta Provincial Health Office Building. This study aims to evaluate active and passive fire protection systems, and life-saving facilities based on Ministerial Regulation No. 26 of 2008 and SNI. The method used was descriptive qualitative with observation, interviews, and document review. The results showed that the fire protection system was in place but not functioning optimally. Active protection was ineffective due to damage to the MCFA, which resulted in the inoperability of alarms, detectors, sprinklers, and hydrants. While fire extinguishers functioned but did not meet placement standards. Passive protection was generally appropriate, but there were deficiencies such as materials and partitions that were not certified fire-resistant, cracks in walls, and fire doors without smoke seals. Lifesaving facilities are relatively up to standard, although evacuation routes remain obstructed, emergency exits difficult to use, assembly points unsafe, and lighting and evacuation signs inadequate. Repairs, maintenance, and regular monitoring are recommended to ensure the safety of building occupants.
The Relationship between Individual Factors and Occupational Factors with the Risk of LBP (Low Back Pain) in Workers at the Jakarta Provincial Health Office Aprilia, Savira; Setianingsih, Ajeng; Rafida, Neni Herlina
Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Perkotaan Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Perkotaan
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Mohammad Husni Thamrin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37012/jkmp.v5i2.2920

Abstract

According to the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2023, LBP (Low Back Pain) is the number one cause of disability in the world, with 619 million sufferers in 2020 and is estimated to increase to 843 million cases in 2050. LBP is often experienced by workers due to non-ergonomic working positions, long working hours, and repetitive activities. This complaint can be caused by various factors, both identifiable and unidentifiable. This study aims to determine the relationship between individual factors (age and gender) and work factors (work position, work period, work duration, and repetition) with the incidence of LBP in employees of the DKI Jakarta Provincial Health Office in 2025. This study used a cross-sectional design with 63 respondents selected through a total sampling technique. The research instrument was a questionnaire whose validity and reliability had been tested using the Chi-Square test at the 95% level. The results of the study showed that individual factors in the form of age and gender and work factors in the form of work duration were not related to the occurrence of LBP, while work factors in the form of work position, work period, and repetitive activities were related to the occurrence of LBP. Research recommendations include efforts to maintain spinal health by paying attention to body position while working, implementing short stretches at certain hours, the 20-20-20 rule, and the preparation of formal regulations in the form of SOPs, SKPs, or Circular Letters to prevent LBP on an ongoing basis.