Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 8 Documents
Search

The Dynamics of Village Treasury Land Management to Provide Legal Certainty and Benefits Ropii, Imam; Chrisdanty, Febry; Candra Kusuma, Ariska Cesar Divian
RechtIdee Vol 19, No 2 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Trunojoyo Madura University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/ri.v19i2.25498

Abstract

The management of village treasury land in Sukolilo Village faces various challenges that deviate from the provisions, especially related to the issue of securing and utilizing village assets. This study aims to examine legal management such as securing and utilizing village treasury land in Sukolilo Village in order to provide legal certainty and benefits for the community. This study uses an empirical or socio-legal method, with a sociological approach to examine the implementation, legal dynamics, and challenges of managing village treasury land in Sukolilo Village, East Java, Indonesia. Regarding security, the land certification process that is designated as part of the village treasury land in Sukolilo Village is still incomplete. Regarding its utilization, buildings utilized by outside parties do not provide economic benefits to the village because they do not have official permits from the village government. The absence of village regulations or directions from the village leadership also creates a legal vacuum. The Sukolilo Village Government needs to immediately register village treasury land and enter into legal agreements stipulated through village regulations. Expansion of the utilization of village treasury land can be done by building tourist villages, utilizing village potential by involving various community groups.
Political Law of Inpatient Regulation for Patients in the Social Security Law Seputra, Hawreyvian Rianda; Ropii, Imam
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v5i5.1766

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the form of legal politics that underlies the regulation of patient hospitalization in the social security system in Indonesia, as well as the extent to which the regulation reflects the principle of social justice for all citizens. The approach used is normative juridical with descriptive-qualitative research type, which examines legal norms through literature study and analyzed based on the theory of legal politics and social justice. Data were obtained from primary legal sources such as relevant laws and regulations, as well as secondary sources in the form of scientific literature, journals, and policy documents. The results show that the regulation of patient hospitalization in Law Number 40 of 2004 concerning the National Social Security System and its derivative regulations reflects the state's efforts to ensure equal access to health services for the entire population, regardless of economic status. The solidarity-based and non-profit social security system makes hospitalization services the right of every participant, including the poor and vulnerable groups. However, implementation in the field still faces challenges in the form of limited facilities, imbalances in services between regions, and gaps in service quality between treatment classes. The Standard Inpatient Class Scheme (KRIS) that is being developed is a corrective step to realize more equitable services and reduce inequality between participants. The political law in this arrangement shows that the state does not only regulate normatively, but also seeks to realize the principle of social justice substantively through inclusive health service policies
A Medico-Legal Study on the Use of Infant Formula as an Alternative to Breastfeeding for Children Aged 0–2 Years Widiastuti, W.; Ropii, Imam; Carolina
Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): July - December
Publisher : Manunggal Halim Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52970/grlspr.v5i1.1463

Abstract

The significant gap between the recommendation for exclusive breastfeeding and its implementation in practice—where many infants still receive formula milk without clear medical indications—highlights the need for more comprehensive regulations and medicolegal oversight to safeguard the health rights of children aged 0–2 years. This study aims to analyze the legal framework and medicolegal aspects of using formula milk as an alternative to breastfeeding for children in this age group. Using a normative legal research method, the study employs statutory, conceptual, and historical approaches, drawing on primary and secondary legal sources, including relevant laws and government regulations. The findings reveal that although national rules, such as Law No. 17/2023 on Health and Government Regulation No. 28/2024, affirm the right to exclusive breastfeeding and restrict formula use to medical indications, gaps remain in implementation and understanding among healthcare professionals. The use of formula milk is permitted only when there is a medical indication, with priority given to donor breast milk. In such cases, formula use must meet AFASS (Acceptable, Feasible, Affordable, Sustainable, and Safe) criteria, be supported by written parental consent, and adhere to strict health protocols. This research contributes to the discourse on child protection, health law, and ethical medical practice, while encouraging the development of stronger operational policies and public education on the responsible use of formula milk based on children's rights and public health safety.
Jambi City Government's Strategy in Overcoming Parental Rejection of Diphtheria Tetanus Immunization at The Talang Bakung Health Center In Jambi City Witri, Repelita; Putra, Marsudi Dedi; Kuntardjo, Carolina; Ropii, Imam
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2538

Abstract

This study aims to identify the factors that cause parents to refuse Diphtheria Tetanus immunization for children's health at the Talang Bakung Health Center, Jambi City, and analyze the legal strategies implemented by the Jambi City Regional Government in overcoming these rejections. The research method used is empirical legal research with a qualitative approach. Data was collected through interviews, observations, and documentation of related parties such as health workers, parents, and local government officials. Data analysis was carried out in a descriptive analytical manner by relating relevant field findings and legal theories. The results of the study showed that immunization refusal by parents was caused by several factors, including concerns about Post-Immunization Adverse Events (AEFIs), lack of understanding of vaccine benefits, the influence of misinformation on social media, and low trust in health workers. Social, cultural, and religious factors also contribute to strengthening resistance to immunization programs. The Jambi City Regional Government implements a persuasive and educational legal strategy by emphasizing increasing public health literacy through integrated socialization, the involvement of religious and community leaders, and the affirmation of legal policies based on Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health and Government Regulation Number 28 of 2024. In addition, the Regional Government strengthens legal protection for health workers and regulates the mechanism for handling AEFIs in a transparent manner to foster public trust. This legal strategy has proven effective in reducing immunization refusal rates and increasing community participation, although ongoing efforts are still needed to strengthen legal awareness and overall public health.
Analysis of the political law of centralization of state authority in law number 17 of 2023 on health: A normative legal study Wibawa, Ida Bagus Gede Adiguna; Ropii, Imam
Journal of Law Science Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): January: Law Science
Publisher : Institute Of computer Science (IOCS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35335/jls.v8i1.6995

Abstract

This article examines the political law underlying the centralization of state authority in Law Number 17 of 2023 on Health. The enactment of this law marks a significant shift in Indonesia’s health legal framework, particularly through the strengthening of the central government’s role in regulating, supervising, and controlling the national health system. The objective of this article is to analyze the legal policy orientation behind this centralization and to assess its implications for health governance, professional autonomy, and adherence to rule-of-law principles. This study employs a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and historical approaches. Primary legal materials consist of Law Number 17 of 2023 and related regulations, while secondary materials include scholarly books and journal articles on political law and health law. The findings indicate that centralization in the Health Law reflects the state’s policy to improve regulatory effectiveness, policy coherence, and equitable health service delivery. However, this legal policy also raises normative and operational challenges, particularly regarding the distribution of power, the independence of health professionals, and institutional accountability. Operational accountability indicators identified include transparency requirements, objection mechanisms, policy audits, and judicial oversight, which are essential to ensure that centralization does not compromise the rule of law or professional autonomy. Finally, the study identifies priority research agendas to strengthen understanding of centralized health governance, such as analyzing conflicts between regulatory norms, reviewing Constitutional Court or Supreme Court decisions on health authority, and conducting comparative studies with other countries. The article concludes that while Law Number 17 of 2023 strengthens national health governance, balanced and conditional centralization supported by legal safeguards is necessary to achieve both effectiveness and normative compliance.
Presidential Elections Without a Threshold in Indonesia: Strengthening Citizens’ Political Rights After the 2025 Constitutional Court Decision Ropii, Imam; Pramono, Agus; Kuntardjo, Carolina; Kusuma, Ariska Cesar Divian Candra
AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah INSURI Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almanhaj.v8i1.8749

Abstract

The presidential threshold in Indonesia, requiring political parties or coalitions to secure at least 20% of parliamentary seats or 25% of valid votes to nominate presidential candidates, has long sparked debate over the constitution. Critics contend that this requirement operates as a structural barrier that limits citizens' political rights and consolidates oligarchic dominance. This study examines the abolition of the presidential threshold following the Constitutional Court's Decision No. 62/PUU-XXII/2024, which annulled Article 222 of the 2017 Election Law. Employing a normative juridical and comparative approach, the research analyzes constitutional principles, judicial reasoning, and electoral practices in selected democracies, including France and the United States. The analysis demonstrates that removing the presidential threshold broadens political participation, enhances inclusivity, and fosters fairer democratic competition by reducing the dominance of major parties. Although the absence of a threshold may increase the number of candidates and the likelihood of run-off elections, such consequences can be mitigated through appropriate institutional design. Normatively, this study concludes that abolishing the presidential threshold is constitutionally justified and necessary to fully realize citizens' political rights and democratic sovereignty in Indonesia.
Implementation of the Health Law in Providing Legal Protection for Medical Personnel and Patients in Indonesia Sari, Fenti Maya; Ropii, Imam
Rechtsvinding Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Civiliza Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59525/rechtsvinding.1246

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the regulation, implementation, and effectiveness of Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health in protecting medical personnel and patients from medical disputes, using a normative legal approach method through a literature study of primary materials in the form of related and secondary laws such as journals and health law doctrines, followed by qualitative analysis based on legal reasoning to interpret norms, consistency of regulations, and juridical implications in service practice. The law regulates balanced protection through the rights of medical personnel to a legal umbrella while complying with professional and patient standards for complete information and informed consent, its implementation is realized through hospital mediation, Professional Disciplinary Councils, and safety protocols that reduce malpractice and violence, while its effectiveness can be seen from reducing litigation conflicts, improving service quality, and public trust through socialization and audits of the Ministry of Health which ensures a harmonious health ecosystem in Indonesia.
Patient Protection in the Health Service System Based on Law Number 17 of 2023 Concerning Health Suhirman, Agung; Ropii, Imam
Rechtsvinding Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Civiliza Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59525/rechtsvinding.1271

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the implementation of patient protection in the health service system based on Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health. The method used is a normative method, with a study approach to applicable legal norms through literature studies in the form of books, journals, and the latest official regulatory documents. The analysis was carried out systematically to understand the substance, implications, and effectiveness of the provisions of the law in protecting patients' rights. The results of the study show that Law Number 17 of 2023 provides a strong legal basis in guaranteeing patients' rights to information, approval of medical procedures, and quality health services. However, the implementation of patient protection still faces various obstacles such as a lack of understanding of medical personnel and health facility managers regarding the new rules, limited resources, and a complaint mechanism that is not optimal. The active role of medical personnel and health institutions is crucial in implementing this protection, especially through the application of professional standards, effective communication with patients, and strict supervision. Strategic efforts identified include increasing socialization and education, strengthening accountability, utilizing information technology, developing an organizational culture that respects patients' rights, and strengthening cross-sector cooperation. The implementation of these measures is expected to improve the quality of safe, fair, and sustainable health services, while increasing public trust in the national health system.