Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 10 Documents
Search

The Dynamics of Village Treasury Land Management to Provide Legal Certainty and Benefits Ropii, Imam; Chrisdanty, Febry; Candra Kusuma, Ariska Cesar Divian
RechtIdee Vol 19, No 2 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Trunojoyo Madura University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/ri.v19i2.25498

Abstract

The management of village treasury land in Sukolilo Village faces various challenges that deviate from the provisions, especially related to the issue of securing and utilizing village assets. This study aims to examine legal management such as securing and utilizing village treasury land in Sukolilo Village in order to provide legal certainty and benefits for the community. This study uses an empirical or socio-legal method, with a sociological approach to examine the implementation, legal dynamics, and challenges of managing village treasury land in Sukolilo Village, East Java, Indonesia. Regarding security, the land certification process that is designated as part of the village treasury land in Sukolilo Village is still incomplete. Regarding its utilization, buildings utilized by outside parties do not provide economic benefits to the village because they do not have official permits from the village government. The absence of village regulations or directions from the village leadership also creates a legal vacuum. The Sukolilo Village Government needs to immediately register village treasury land and enter into legal agreements stipulated through village regulations. Expansion of the utilization of village treasury land can be done by building tourist villages, utilizing village potential by involving various community groups.
Political Law of Inpatient Regulation for Patients in the Social Security Law Seputra, Hawreyvian Rianda; Ropii, Imam
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v5i5.1766

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the form of legal politics that underlies the regulation of patient hospitalization in the social security system in Indonesia, as well as the extent to which the regulation reflects the principle of social justice for all citizens. The approach used is normative juridical with descriptive-qualitative research type, which examines legal norms through literature study and analyzed based on the theory of legal politics and social justice. Data were obtained from primary legal sources such as relevant laws and regulations, as well as secondary sources in the form of scientific literature, journals, and policy documents. The results show that the regulation of patient hospitalization in Law Number 40 of 2004 concerning the National Social Security System and its derivative regulations reflects the state's efforts to ensure equal access to health services for the entire population, regardless of economic status. The solidarity-based and non-profit social security system makes hospitalization services the right of every participant, including the poor and vulnerable groups. However, implementation in the field still faces challenges in the form of limited facilities, imbalances in services between regions, and gaps in service quality between treatment classes. The Standard Inpatient Class Scheme (KRIS) that is being developed is a corrective step to realize more equitable services and reduce inequality between participants. The political law in this arrangement shows that the state does not only regulate normatively, but also seeks to realize the principle of social justice substantively through inclusive health service policies
A Medico-Legal Study on the Use of Infant Formula as an Alternative to Breastfeeding for Children Aged 0–2 Years Widiastuti, W.; Ropii, Imam; Carolina
Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): July - December
Publisher : Manunggal Halim Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52970/grlspr.v5i1.1463

Abstract

The significant gap between the recommendation for exclusive breastfeeding and its implementation in practice—where many infants still receive formula milk without clear medical indications—highlights the need for more comprehensive regulations and medicolegal oversight to safeguard the health rights of children aged 0–2 years. This study aims to analyze the legal framework and medicolegal aspects of using formula milk as an alternative to breastfeeding for children in this age group. Using a normative legal research method, the study employs statutory, conceptual, and historical approaches, drawing on primary and secondary legal sources, including relevant laws and government regulations. The findings reveal that although national rules, such as Law No. 17/2023 on Health and Government Regulation No. 28/2024, affirm the right to exclusive breastfeeding and restrict formula use to medical indications, gaps remain in implementation and understanding among healthcare professionals. The use of formula milk is permitted only when there is a medical indication, with priority given to donor breast milk. In such cases, formula use must meet AFASS (Acceptable, Feasible, Affordable, Sustainable, and Safe) criteria, be supported by written parental consent, and adhere to strict health protocols. This research contributes to the discourse on child protection, health law, and ethical medical practice, while encouraging the development of stronger operational policies and public education on the responsible use of formula milk based on children's rights and public health safety.
Jambi City Government's Strategy in Overcoming Parental Rejection of Diphtheria Tetanus Immunization at The Talang Bakung Health Center In Jambi City Witri, Repelita; Putra, Marsudi Dedi; Kuntardjo, Carolina; Ropii, Imam
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2538

Abstract

This study aims to identify the factors that cause parents to refuse Diphtheria Tetanus immunization for children's health at the Talang Bakung Health Center, Jambi City, and analyze the legal strategies implemented by the Jambi City Regional Government in overcoming these rejections. The research method used is empirical legal research with a qualitative approach. Data was collected through interviews, observations, and documentation of related parties such as health workers, parents, and local government officials. Data analysis was carried out in a descriptive analytical manner by relating relevant field findings and legal theories. The results of the study showed that immunization refusal by parents was caused by several factors, including concerns about Post-Immunization Adverse Events (AEFIs), lack of understanding of vaccine benefits, the influence of misinformation on social media, and low trust in health workers. Social, cultural, and religious factors also contribute to strengthening resistance to immunization programs. The Jambi City Regional Government implements a persuasive and educational legal strategy by emphasizing increasing public health literacy through integrated socialization, the involvement of religious and community leaders, and the affirmation of legal policies based on Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health and Government Regulation Number 28 of 2024. In addition, the Regional Government strengthens legal protection for health workers and regulates the mechanism for handling AEFIs in a transparent manner to foster public trust. This legal strategy has proven effective in reducing immunization refusal rates and increasing community participation, although ongoing efforts are still needed to strengthen legal awareness and overall public health.
Presidential Elections Without a Threshold in Indonesia: Strengthening Citizens’ Political Rights After the 2025 Constitutional Court Decision Ropii, Imam; Pramono, Agus; Kuntardjo, Carolina; Kusuma, Ariska Cesar Divian Candra
AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah INSURI Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almanhaj.v8i1.8749

Abstract

The presidential threshold in Indonesia, requiring political parties or coalitions to secure at least 20% of parliamentary seats or 25% of valid votes to nominate presidential candidates, has long sparked debate over the constitution. Critics contend that this requirement operates as a structural barrier that limits citizens' political rights and consolidates oligarchic dominance. This study examines the abolition of the presidential threshold following the Constitutional Court's Decision No. 62/PUU-XXII/2024, which annulled Article 222 of the 2017 Election Law. Employing a normative juridical and comparative approach, the research analyzes constitutional principles, judicial reasoning, and electoral practices in selected democracies, including France and the United States. The analysis demonstrates that removing the presidential threshold broadens political participation, enhances inclusivity, and fosters fairer democratic competition by reducing the dominance of major parties. Although the absence of a threshold may increase the number of candidates and the likelihood of run-off elections, such consequences can be mitigated through appropriate institutional design. Normatively, this study concludes that abolishing the presidential threshold is constitutionally justified and necessary to fully realize citizens' political rights and democratic sovereignty in Indonesia.
Legal Analysis of Female Circumcision in The Context of Legal Pluralism in Indonesia Hasmita, Debby; Ropii, Imam; Putra, Marsudi Dedi
AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah INSURI Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almanhaj.v8i1.8550

Abstract

This study aims to analyze legal regulations on female circumcision practices from the perspective of legal pluralism in Indonesia and examine the legal implications for women's health protection. The research method used is normative legal research with a qualitative approach, based on the analysis of legislation, legal literature, and expert opinions. The approaches used include a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach to examine the relationship among state law, religious law, and customary law regarding the practice of female circumcision. The results of the study show that the Indonesian government, through Law No. 17 of 2023 concerning Health and Government Regulation No. 28 of 2024, has prohibited female circumcision as a form of protection of human rights and reproductive health in accordance with WHO recommendations. However, the practice of female circumcision is still found in society in symbolic and traditional forms, which are considered part of the values of purity and moral obligations. Differences in perception between state law, religious law, and customary law pose challenges in policy implementation. Clarity on the legal boundaries between permissible and prohibited forms of circumcision is necessary to ensure the protection of women and children without causing social resistance in the community.
Analisis Yuridis Penerapan Standar Pelayanan Minimum (SPM) di Bidang Kesehatan di Puskesmas Afsari, Novi; Ropii, Imam
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v6i2.6747

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis secara yuridis implementasi Standar Pelayanan Minimal (SPM) di sektor kesehatan di Puskesmas menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Metode yang digunakan mencakup pemeriksaan terhadap undang-undang dan peraturan terkait, doktrin hukum, serta literatur hukum, serta melakukan studi literatur terhadap bahan hukum primer dan sekunder yang relevan. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui studi literatur dan dianalisis menggunakan teknik reduksi data, penyajian data secara sistematis, serta penarikan kesimpulan kualitatif guna memperoleh gambaran komprehensif mengenai regulasi dan implementasi SPM di Puskesmas. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa implementasi SPM di Puskesmas sangat bergantung pada kerangka regulasi yang kuat dan terintegrasi sebagai landasan hukum dalam pelaksanaan layanan kesehatan dasar. Hambatan signifikan ditemukan dalam keterbatasan sumber daya manusia, infrastruktur yang tidak memadai, kendala administratif, pembiayaan, serta kondisi geografis dan partisipasi masyarakat yang rendah. Berbagai upaya penegakan hukum telah dilakukan melalui penguatan regulasi, penataan wewenang yang jelas, pengawasan dan evaluasi rutin, sistem pelaporan standar, sosialisasi hukum, koordinasi lintas sektor, serta pemberian sanksi administratif untuk memastikan kepatuhan dalam implementasi SPM. Penegakan aspek hukum ini merupakan faktor penting untuk memastikan kualitas layanan kesehatan yang adil dan berkelanjutan di Puskesmas sebagai garda terdepan layanan kesehatan masyarakat.
Legal pluralism in the practice of informed consent among indigenous communities Hardini, RA. Sri; Respati, Agustinus Giri; Roeswandi, RM. Achmad; Ropii, Imam
Science Midwifery Vol 14 No 1 (2026): April: Health Sciences and related fields
Publisher : Institute of Computer Science (IOCS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35335/midwifery.v14i1.2321

Abstract

The transformation of individual autonomy standards in modern health law often creates a conflict of norms when implemented within the communal social structures of indigenous peoples. This research aims to analyze the dialectics of legal pluralism in the practice of medical informed consent to find a middle ground between centralistic state regulations and the "living law" within indigenous communities. This study employs an empirical legal research method with a socio-legal approach using a descriptive-qualitative design. The results reveal the phenomenon of "collective autonomy," where the validity of medical consent does not merely rely on individual will but is significantly determined by the legitimacy of customary authority and family deliberation mechanisms. Findings indicate that current informed consent practices tend to be legalistic-formal and fail to translate medical risks into local cultural logic, thereby creating judicial vulnerability for both medical personnel and indigenous patients. It is concluded that a reconstruction of the informed consent model based on "Integrative Legal Pluralism" is required, which accommodates communal consent and the use of cultural mediators as a legitimate part of medico-legal procedures. This model offers a strategic solution to achieve a more inclusive healthcare service, respecting the constitutional rights of indigenous peoples while ensuring equitable legal certainty in Indonesia.
Legal liability of nurses in adverse events: A normative-empirical analysis of patient safety governance at RSUD dr. Soeroto Ngawi Widyastuti, Melita; Astuti, Sri Ayu; Ropii, Imam; Putra, Marsudi Dedi; Kuntardjo, Carolina
Science Midwifery Vol 14 No 1 (2026): April: Health Sciences and related fields
Publisher : Institute of Computer Science (IOCS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35335/midwifery.v14i1.2341

Abstract

Adverse events pose a serious threat to patient safety in hospitals. Data from RSUD Dr. Soeroto Ngawi reveal fluctuations in medical incident cases over 2021–2024 (n=354), with procedural and medication errors dominating patient safety reports. A critical research gap persists regarding inconsistent SOP implementation and a blame culture that suppresses transparent incident reporting — gaps unaddressed through an integrated legal-empirical lens. This study aims to analyze forms of nursing negligence, construct a legal accountability framework, and identify barriers and resolution efforts at a regional public hospital. An empirical legal approach was employed, combining case-based and statutory analysis. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with eight key informants, observation, and document review, then analyzed using descriptive qualitative methods with legal triangulation. Results indicate that nursing negligence primarily occurs in patient identification and clinical communication during handover. Nurses' accountability is manifested through immediate clinical responses, IKP system reporting, and root-cause investigations under Law No. 17 of 2023 on Health. Accountability nonetheless remains hindered by psychological barriers and structural workload imbalances. The scientific contribution of this study is the Dual-Layer Accountability Model, which proportionately assigns legal liability between individual professional conduct and institutional systemic failures — a framework absent from prior Indonesian health law scholarship. It is recommended that hospital management adopt a non-punitive just culture, digitize incident reporting, and strengthen clinical risk management training to ensure legal certainty for nurses while advancing patient safety.
Perlindungan Hukum Rekam Medis elektronik dalam Praktik Kedokteran Gigi: Legal Protection of Electronic Medical Records in Dental Practice Darmadi, Eveline Yulia; Ropii, Imam; Agus Susanto, Dany
Jurnal Hukum dan Etika Kesehatan Vol 6 No 1 (2026): VOLUME 6 NO 1
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum - Universitas Hang Tuah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30649/jhek.v6i1.271

Abstract

The implementation of electronic medical records in dental practice raises legal issues that extend beyond administrative concerns to include the protection of patient rights and legal certainty for dental professionals. The enactment of Law Number 17 of 2023 on Health strengthens the obligation to adopt digital medical records while simultaneously creating potential normative tensions with personal data protection and technical regulations on medical records. This study aims to analyze the legal protection of electronic medical records in dental practice and to identify normative gaps that may weaken legal protection for both patients and healthcare professionals. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches by examining health legislation, personal data protection law, and relevant implementing regulations. The findings indicate that electronic medical records occupy a strategic position as both clinical documentation and legal evidence; however, the existing regulatory framework has not yet ensured proportional legal certainty. Ambiguities in the allocation of legal responsibility, potential normative disharmony, and the absence of specific regulations for dental practice may expose patients and dental professionals to legal risks. Therefore, regulatory strengthening and normative harmonization are required to ensure that the digitalization of medical records effectively safeguards patient rights and professional accountability.