Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal UNTAG Law Review Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum Journal Philosophy of Law
Supeno, Bambang Joyo
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
PRINCIPLE OF EQUALITY BEFORE THE LAW AND DIVERSION ON CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM FOR CHILDREN IN INDONESIA SUPENO, BAMBANG JOYO
UNTAG Law Review Vol 4, No 1 (2020): UNTAG LAW REVIEW (ULREV)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (520.581 KB) | DOI: 10.36356/ulrev.v4i1.1527

Abstract

Restorative justice is the ultimate goal of Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System for Children, so that children in conflict with the law must obtain Diversion. Article 7 paragraph (2) and Article 9 paragraph (2) the SPPA Law isdiscriminatory and unjust, both for perpetrators and victims of criminal acts, because there are restrictions, exceptions and disregard for Diversion provisions. In concretto, in 2014-2018 the use of Diversion (49.61%) was lower than formal justice (50.39%), the data showed that some children who were in conflict with the law did not get Diversion. Based on the analysis of concept the principle of equality before the law in ideal-norm thinking, it is necessary to reconstruct the provisions of Diversion in the SPPA Law, namely (a) The principle of equality before the law must be used as a determining indicator in the formulation and process of Diversion law enforcement. (b) Provisions on child-oriented Diversion as the subject of criminal acts will determine justice in the application of Diversion for every child in conflict with the law. (c) Diversion provisions which are oriented towards acts, sanctions and value of losses as a requirement for the application of Diversion, will cause discrimination in the application of Diversion.
CRIMINAL POLICY ON INDONESIAN POLICE RESTORATIVE JUSTICE IMPLEMENTATION PERIOD 2021-2023 Nugroho, Sofyan; Pujiyono, Pujiyono; Supeno, Bambang Joyo
Journal Philosophy of Law Vol 5, No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/jpl.v5i1.4895

Abstract

Criminal policy or criminal politics as an effort to prevent and control crime is essentially an integral part of efforts to protect society (social defense) and efforts to achieve social welfare, both of which are an integral part of social politics (social policy). This is related to the criminal justice system is carried out by the police as the front guard in maintaining security and social order in society and law enforcement. Legal reform carried out by the Police through Restorative Justice is a new instrument in realizing social justice. Therefore, the first formulation of the problem in this paper is a) What is the regulatory framework of Indonesian Police Restorative Justice in Indonesia? b) How is the implementation of Indonesian Police Policy of Restorative Justice in Indonesia period 2021 – 2023? Methodologically, this research uses a qualitative approach, with a qualitative research design and literature study. The research results show a number of findings: First, there are still very few cases that use alternative dispute resolution for criminal acts. Second, the importance of a legal and regulatory policy framework that is based on restorative justice that is fair and has legal certainty.
Pancasila Values Were Forgotten In The Formation Of Indonesian Legislation Supeno, Bambang Joyo; Widyorini, Sri Retno
Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum VOLUME 9 ISSUE 1 OCTOBER 2024
Publisher : PDIH Untag Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/jidh.v0i0.5160

Abstract

the ideology of the Indonesian nation, is considered to have been neglected in the formation of legislation. As is known, Pancasila, as the source of all sources of state law, is interpreted as the principles or foundation for thinking and acting in the formation and enforcement of legislation. Empirically, the values of Pancasila have been forgotten as principles, both in abstracto and in concreto, leading to deviations, disharmony, and inconsistency in the formation of legislation. This study is a qualitative research using a normative juridical approach, which will explore and analyze these issues using secondary data and purposive random sampling. The analysis results show that three factors influence the neglect of Pancasila values as "principles" and the inconsistency in the use of "principles" provisions in the formation of legislation: the fluctuating disintegration of the Pancasila curriculum, the unclear and non-explicit regulation of Pancasila values as "principles" in Law No. 12 of 2011 juncto Law No. 13 of 2022 and its implementing regulations, and the inconsistency in the use of "principles" provisions in legislation. Based on these issues, it is necessary to strengthen the Pancasila curriculum, amend Article 2 by adding the phrase "Pancasila values as the principles of the content of legislation," and require the political will of the government and legislature to strengthen the curriculum and regulations for the formation of legislation.
A Legal Study of the Implementation of the Collective Music Royalty Management System in Indonesia Widyorini, Sri Retno; Wahyuni, Husnia Hilmi; Supeno, Bambang Joyo
UNTAG Law Review Vol 9, No 2 (2025): UNTAG Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/ulrev.v9i2.6721

Abstract

The collective management system regulated by Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright, Government Regulation Number 56 of 2021, and various ministerial regulations is designed to protect the economic rights of creators, related rights owners, and users of musical works through a royalty collection and distribution mechanism. However, its implementation has given rise to various normative issues, ranging from overlapping authority between LMK and LMKN, unclear licensing mechanisms, and minimal transparency in royalty distribution. This culminated in a number of creators filing judicial review lawsuits against PP 56/2021 and Permenkumham 27/2025, objecting to the system's inconsistency with copyright protection principles. This study aims to legally examine the implementation of the collective music royalty management system in Indonesia and assess its compliance with the principles of justice, legal certainty, and transparency. This study uses a normative legal approach supported by philosophical and conceptual analysis. The results of this study found that the implementation of the collective royalty management system still faces various ineffectiveness, including potential conflicts of interest, administrative burdens, and a lack of institutional accountability. This situation indicates the need for regulatory reformulation and strengthening of institutional governance so that the royalty management system can operate fairly, transparently, and sustainably to support the national music industry ecosystem.
Co-Authors Husnia Hilmi Wahyuni Nugroho, Sofyan Pujiyono Pujiyono Sri Retno Widyorini