Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Legalitas Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran
Rompis, Adrian E.
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
THE ELIMINATION OF STATE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT’S AUTHORITY TO DECIDE POSITIVE FICTITIOUS DECISIONS AFTER THE AMENDMENT TO LAW NUMBER 30 OF 2014 CONNECTED WITH THE GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF GOOD GOVERNANCE Pertiwi, Adinda Putri; Rompis, Adrian E.; Nurzaman, R. Adi
Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): JURNAL POROS HUKUM PADJADJARAN
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23920/jphp.v5i1.1390

Abstract

Government agencies and/or officials carry out the task of administering the state using legal instruments, one of which is decisions. If within the allotted time a government official does not respond to the request filed against him, his silence is equated with a fictitious decision. The fictitious decisions that apply in Indonesia are positive fictitious decisions, implicitly contained in Article 53 paragraph (3) of Law Number 30 of 2014, namely the government's silence means a form of acceptance. A positive fictitious decision needs to be submitted to the Administrative Court to get an acceptance decision. After the UUCK, PTUN's authority to decide on positive fictitious decisions was abolished, so what are the legal consequences and whether this is in accordance with the AUPB. The research method uses normative juridical with statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. The results of the research show that PTUN does not have the authority to decide on a positive fictitious decision request due to the abolition of Article 53 paragraph (4) in UUCK, so that the settlement lies with government agencies. However, there is a disparity in the judge's decision regarding the authority of PTUN to decide on a positive fictitious decision request caused by two approaches, namely legalistic positivism and action. It is possible to enter a positive fictitious case by filing a lawsuit for unlawful acts by government agencies and/or officials. The abolition of PTUN's authority is not in accordance with AUPB, especially the principles of legal certainty, expediency, accuracy, and fairness.
Legal Studies Regarding Pornography On Live Streaming Through Social Media In The Era Of Digital Disruption Tanaya, Farra Shalma; Rompis, Adrian E.; Rafianti, Laina
JURNAL LEGALITAS Vol 15, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (484.1 KB) | DOI: 10.33756/jelta.v15i1.13920

Abstract

Technology in human life lately is increasingly needed and continues to develop. One form of development that occurs is the emergence of the Live Streaming feature. This feature appears on various social media platforms. There are even new applications that are intended to do Live Broadcasting—unfortunately, not only positive things that emerged due to this development. There have been several cybercrimes (cyber laws) that have negatively influenced internet users. Among them is the emergence of internet pornography. There is much Live Streaming that contains pornography in Live Broadcasting applications. The approach method used in this research is normative juridical, by examining the literature and reviewing positive law, which relates to the Law of Technology, Information and Electronic Transactions, and the Law of Pornography. This research will study the most appropriate way to regulate how Live Streaming containing pornography is viewed from Law Number 11 of 2008 jo. Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions (ITE act) and Law Number 44 of 2008 concerning Pornography (Pornography act) and actions that the Government can take to minimize pornographic content on Live Streaming on social media in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Laina Rafianti Nurzaman, R. Adi Pertiwi, Adinda Putri Tanaya, Farra Shalma