Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.888
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Justitia et Pax BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan Jurnal Yuridis Bina Hukum Lingkungan Strategi Memperkuat Integritas Lembaga Peradilan Indonesia Jurnal Dinamika Hukum
Muhammad Fikri Alan
UIN Syekh Wasil Kediri
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Immunology & microbiology Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
REVITALISASI NILAI-NILAI PANCASILA DALAM PENGELOLAAN SUMBER DAYA AGRARIA DI INDONESIA Alan, Muhammad Fikri
Justitia et Pax Vol 33, No 2 (2017): Justitia et Pax Volume 33 Nomor 2 Tahun 2017
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (364.343 KB) | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v33i2.1600

Abstract

AbstractPancasila has been placed as the “philosophical foundation” of Indonesia. That conditions, make Pancasila should be implemented and become the basis in formulating any policies related to the life of nation and state. Instead, the values of Pancasila are in fact not yet realized, especially in the field of natural resource management. This paper will identify many of these aberrations, as well as discuss the conception of the management of theideal agrarian resources according to the values contained in Pancasila.Keywords: Pancasila, Natural Resources Management, RevitalizationIntisariPancasila telah dijadikan “landasan filosofis” Indonesia. Kondisi tersebut, membuat Pancasila harus diimplementasikan dan menjadi dasar dalam merumuskan kebijakan apapun yang berkaitan dengan kehidupan berbangsa dan bernegara. Meskipun demikian, nilai-nilai Pancasila sebenarnya belum terealisasi, terutama di bidang pengelolaan sumber daya agraria. Makalah ini akan mengidentifikasi banyak penyimpangan tersebut, serta membahas konsep pengelolaan sumber agraria yang ideal sesuai dengan nilai-nilai yang terkandung dalam Pancasila.Kata Kunci: Pancasila, Sumber Daya Agraria, Revitalisasi
KEBIJAKAN IMPOR BERAS DI INDONESIA: SUATU PENDEKATAN EKONOMIKA DAN HUKUM Alan, Muhammad Fikri
Jurnal Yuridis Vol 6, No 1 (2019): Jurnal Yuridis
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (230.289 KB) | DOI: 10.35586/jyur.v6i1.792

Abstract

Penelitian ini berangkat dari kenyataan adanya gap antara norma hukum di bidang pangan, dengan kebijakan impor beras di Indonesia. Norma hukum yang mengamanatkan agar kebijakan ekspor pangan dilakukan ketika kebutuhan dalam negeri telah terpenuhi, dan impor dilakukan ketika kebutuhan dalam negeri mengalami kekurangan, kenyataannya justru dilakukan secara bersamaan. Berdasarkan data Badan Pusat Statistik, Indonesia masih melakukan impor beras bersama-sama dengan kebijakan ekspor. Sepanjang Januari-Oktober 2017, impor beras Indonesia mencapai 256,56 ribu ton dengan nilai US$ 119,78 juta dan pada saat yang bersamaan pula, ekspor beras Indonesia sepanjang Januari-November 2017 mencapai 3,5 ribu ton dengan nilai US$ 3,25 juta. Penelitian ini sedikit banyak akan membahas mengenai permasalahan tersebut. Pembahasan utamanya akan melihat dari faktor-faktor apa yang sesungguhnya masih mengakibatkan dilakukannya impor beras di Indonesia dan berakibat pada ketidaksesuaian antara kebijakannya dengan norma hukum.
Mendesain Putusan Hakim Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Tentang Opened Legal Policy: Suatu Upaya Mewujudkan Integritas Peradilan Alan, Muhammad Fikri; Saputri, Fenolia Intan
Judex Laguens Vol 1 No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Ikatan Hakim Indonesia (IKAHI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/ikahi.1.1.4.2023.57-80

Abstract

The Administrative Court Judge's decision according to paragraph 97 section (7) Law Number 5 of 1986 consists of 4 types of decisions, namely: (a) Rejected Decision, (b) Accepted Decision, (c) Not Accepted Decision, (d) Aborted Decision. A State Administrative Decree (KTUN) can be defended, if the KTUN does not actually conflict with the Legislation and AUPB. This raises a new question, can a KTUN be defended on the grounds that the KTUN is an Opened Legal Policy from a State Administrative Agency or Official? In this paper the author tries to formulate an ideal design regarding PTUN decisions under the pretext of opened legal policy. The aim is that in the future there will be no debates regarding all decisions issued by the PTUN which are none other than as a momentum to realize an integrity of the judiciary in the life of the nation and state. The author in his writings uses the normative juridical method with statutory approaches, conceptual approaches, and case approaches.
Restorative Justice and Agrarian Reform Conflict Resolution Alan, Muhammad Fikri
BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024): Bhumi: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, Sekolah Tinggi Pertanahan Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31292/bhumi.v10i1.773

Abstract

Abstract: Various structural agrarian conflicts remain unresolved after the government's implementation of agrarian reform. Differences in interpretation of agrarian reform trigger the conflict. The government's interpretation is different from the community's interpretation, which considers agrarian reform to be a systematic effort to provide the community with access to land. This article employs an empirical legal research method, combining a sociological perspective and a case study approach. This article contains several important findings, one of which is that asset legalization is not an agrarian reform. Asset legalization fails to address the issue of land ownership inequality. The government's implementation of land redistribution fails to address the issue of land ownership inequality. The government's version of land redistribution not only fails to resolve the issue of land ownership inequality, but also seizes land from marginalized communities. The same goes for social forestry. Social forestry leaves behind unresolved agrarian and environmental conflicts. Differences in interpreting agrarian reform actually cause all these problems. Therefore, we can use restorative justice as an alternative to solving the problem. As a problem-solving model involving victims and suspects, this resolution model seeks peace between the two parties. The hope is that there will be no more bloody agrarian conflicts, especially related to agrarian reform in Indonesia. Keywords: Agrarian Reform, Agrarian Conflict, Restorative Justice
PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE DALAM PENGELOLAAN LIMBAH B3 PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 18/PUU-XII/2014 Alan, Muhammad Fikri; Zulharman, Zulharman; Butar, Franky Butar
Bina Hukum Lingkungan Vol. 6 No. 1 (2021): Bina Hukum Lingkungan, Volume 6, Nomor 1, Oktober 2021
Publisher : Asosiasi Pembina Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia (PHLI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Terdapat gap dalam pemaknaan Precautionary Principle antara sebelum dan sesudah Putusan MK Nomor 18/PUU-XII/2014. Sebelum putusan tersebut, Precautionary Principle diartikan sebagai prinsip yang mewajibkan adanya pembuktian ilmiah atas kegiatan usaha terhadap lingkungan. Sedangkan pasca Putusan MK a quo, pembuktian ilmiah ini menjadi hal yang tidak mutlak diperlukan, karena putusan tersebut menganggap bahwa setiap pelaku usaha yang sedang melakukan perpanjangan izin pengelolaan limbah, dianggap telah memiliki izin meskipun izinnya belum keluar. Padahal, izin pengelolaan limbah adalah elemen penting guna menjaga kelestarian lingkungan sehingga diperlukan konsep perizinan yang rumit, ilmiah, serta berdasarkan pertimbangan yang matang. Selain itu, pasca putusan ini, bagi setiap pelaku usaha yang sedang melakukan proses perpanjangan Izin Pengelolaan Limbah, tidak dapat dipidana apabila dalam kenyataan ditemukan pelanggaran izin. Penelitian ini berusaha untuk merumuskan bentuk pemaknaan baru mengenai Precautionary Principle Pasca Putusan MK a quo. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis normatif, dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konsep.
Unraveling the Darkness of Raja Ampat: A Neglected Criminal Justice System Tjoetjoe Sandjaja Hernanto; Muhammad Fikri Alan; Mohammad Hazyar Arumbinang
Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Vol 25 No 3 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.jdh.2025.25.3.16682

Abstract

This study examines the complex challenges confronting Raja Ampat, a globally significant region renowned its extraordinary marine biodiversity and rich cultural heritage, through the lens of an integrated criminal justice system. Raja Ampat is increasingly imperiled by illegal activities, including unregulated nickel mining and environmental exploitation, which threaten both ecological integrity and social well-being. Utilizing a normative legal methodology with statue and conceptual analysis, this research critically evaluates the current application of justice mechanisms involving law enforcement, judicial institutions, correctional services, and community participation. The study reveals critical systemic weaknesses, including fragmented legal authorities, poor coordination with local communities, and inadequate policy integration, that perpetuate illegal practices and social conflicts. Importantly, this study emphasizes the need to harmonize environmental regulations with criminal law frameworks to establish stronger deterrents against ecological crimes. Beyond its regional focus, this study contributes to the international discourse on ecological governance and criminal justice by providing a replicable model of integrated legal frameworks that balance ecological conservation with community empowerment. The findings provide actionable insights for global policymakers, law enforcement agencies, and civil society organizations seeking to enhance justice systems as effective instruments for sustainable development and social equity. Ultimately, this study advocates for a collaborative and comprehensive approach to justice system that aligns enforcement mechanisms with global sustainability goals, thereby supporting the preservation of biodiversity hotspots worldwide.
Co-Authors Franky Butar Butar Mohammad Hazyar Arumbinang Saputri, Fenolia Intan Tjoetjoe Sandjaja Hernanto Zulharman Zulharman