Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Mumtaz: Jurnal Studi Al-Quran dan Keislaman MUSHAF: Jurnal Tafsir Berwawasan Keindonesiaan Jurnal Islam Nusantara
Zulfa, Nailatuz
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
TAFSIR OTORITARIANISME: NEGOSIASI PENGGUNAAN AYAT DALAM KEPUTUSAN FATWA MUI TENTANG AHMADIYAH PERSPEKTIF ABOU KHALLED EL FADL Najiburrohman, Najiburrohman; Zulfa, Nailatuz; Basid, Abd.
JURNAL ISLAM NUSANTARA Vol 3, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Lembaga Ta'lif wa An-Nasyr (LTN) PBNU

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (295.826 KB) | DOI: 10.33852/jurnalin.v3i2.148

Abstract

This paper discusses the MUI fatwa on Ahmadiyah. The purpose of this research is to find out MUI's interpretation of religious harmony, as well as to find out the verses used by MUI in its fatwa on Ahmadiyah through the concept of hermeneutics Abou Khaled El Fadl. To answer this problem, the researcher uses the maudhu'i interpretation approach, which is interpreting the verses of the Qur'an not based on the order of the verses, but based on the problem being studied. It means to explain the verses of the Qur'an by referring to one specific subject, namely Ahmadiyya. This research uses a qualitative approach with library research. Data collection techniques are done by quoting, adapting, and analyzing the literature that is relevant to the problem discussed, then reviewing and concluding. The results showed that; through the authoritative hermeneutics of abou khaled el fadl against the MUI fatwa on the misguidance of the Ahmadiyah, there are several assumptions including: first, of the five conditions that require, there are conditions that have not been fulfilled, namely honesty and conference. Second, there are faith-based assumptions that are very dominant in this institution.
THE STORY OF SACRIFICE IN THE QUR’AN AND THE BIBLE: JULIA KRESTEVA’S INTERTEXTUAL APPROACH Zulfa, Nailatuz
MUSHAF: Jurnal Tafsir Berwawasan Keindonesiaan Vol 2, No 2 (2022): Living Qur'an and the Holy Book of Religions in Indonesia
Publisher : Universitas Nurul Jadid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33650/mushaf.v2i2.3732

Abstract

This paper discusses the story of the sacrifice carried out by Prophet Ibrahim in the Qur’an. The story in question is narrated in the Qur’an and the Bible. The story of Abraham’s sacrifice is significant in finding the similarities and differences between the two. Therefore, the approach used in this research is intertextual, initiated by Julia Kristeva, who tries to compare the narrative or interpretation between the two. Using this approach, many differences were found. This study concludes that the sacrifice narrated in the Qur’an by the author is divided into three fragments, the initial fragment, namely the sacrifice commandment, has the principle of expansion and haplology; the fragment of the sacrificial process itself has the principle of haplogy, and the last fragment is the principle of expansion and modification.
Kontinuitas Munasabah Dalam Al-Quran Shofiana, Anna; Zulfa, Nailatuz
Mumtaz: Jurnal Studi Al-Quran dan Keislaman Vol 5, No 2 (2021): Mumtaz: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an dan Keislaman
Publisher : Institut PTIQ Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36671/mumtaz.v5i02.194

Abstract

Tulisan ini membahas tentang kontinuitas/perkembangan dari munasabah dalam al-quran namun yang menjadi titik fokus adalah terkait dengan tafsir yang  digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu pada karya Tafsir dari " Fakhr Al-Din Al-Razi, Al-Biqa’i Dan Hamid Al-Din Al-Farahi". Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui bentuk dari karakteristik kontinuitas munasabah dalam al-quran melalui karya 3 tafsir yaitu Tafsir Mafatih al-Ghaib, Asrar tartib Nazhmud Durar fi Tanasubil Ayi was-Suwar,. Untuk menjawab permasalahan tersebut, peneliti menggunakan pendekatan penelitian ini menggunakan diskriptif-analitik ,dengan Teknik yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah: Deduktif, yaitu mencari berbagai macam literatur atau referesi yang berkaitan dengan munasabah. Kemudian membahas munasabah secara umum. Induktif,. Tekhnik pengumpulan datanya dilakukan dengan mengutip, menyadur, dan menganalisis literatur-literatur yang relevan dengan masalah yang dibahas, kemudian mengulas dan menyimpulkannya. Hasil penelitiannya menunjukkan bahwaPenggunaan munasabah pada abad modern-kontemporer ini sudah tidak seperti di abad klasik dan pertengahan artinya sudah terdapat penambahan. Munasabah ayat dalam satu surah yang diterapkan ulama’ klasik dan pertengahan hanya menjelaskan sebagiannya saja. Berbeda dengan munasabah yang diterapkan oleh ulama’ modern-kontemporer yang sudah mampu mencetuskan bahwa secara keseluruhan ayat dalam satu surat itu terdapat korelasi. Sehingga mampu menyalahkan persepsi seseorang yang mengatakan bahwa teks arab itu terputus-putus tidak sistematisKata Kunci: al-Quran, Munasabah, kontinuitas
Co-Authors Abd. Basid Basid, Abd. Najiburrohman, Najiburrohman Shofiana, Anna