Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Fenomena Pantangan Menikah di Bulan Suro Prespektif Hukum Islam (Studi di Desa Sukomarto, Jumo, Temanggung) Hartatiningsih, Siti; Sumarjoko, Sumarjoko; Ulfa, Hidayatun
Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner Vol. 1 No. 2 Oktober 2022: Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner
Publisher : Yayasan Azhar Amanaa Yogyakarta

Membahas tentang adat Jawa tidak asing lagi bahwa adat Jawa memiliki kebiasaan yaitu keyakinan menentukan waktu dalam melaksanakan suatu hajat, misalkan hajatan perkawinan. Dalam adat Jawa ada satu bulan yang biasanya tidak digunkan dalam melakukan perkawinan yaitu bulan Suro (Muharram). Adat ini juga berlaku di desa Sukomarto, Kecamatan Jumo, Kabupaten Temanggung, meskipun mayoritas masyarakatnya memeluk Agama Islam akan tetapi masyarakat masih mempertahankan adat turun temurun tersebut. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui presepsi masyarakat Desa Sukomarto terhadap pantangan menikah di bulan Suro (Muharram) dan pandangan hukum Islamnya. Jenis penelitian ini yaitu penelitian field research (lapangan), sifatnya penelitian ini yaitu kualitatif, penelitian ini termasuk dalam penelitian deskriptif analisis sedangkan pengumpulan data menggunakan teknik observasi, wawancara dan dokumentasi. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa masyarakat sangat menghormati bulan Suro (Muharram), hal ini dikarenakan secara filosofis bulan tersebut terdapat peristiwa-peristiwa atau sejarah tentang pembantaian keluarga Nabi Muhammad SAW yang menimbulkan rasa kagum dan haru yang menjadikan bulan tersebut menjadi bulan yang sangat dimuliakan, selain itu masyarakat memiliki keyakinan jika meggelar hajatan pada bulan tersebut takut terjadi seuatu yang tidak baik. Selain perkawinan kegiatan yang tidak dilakukan pada bulan Suro (Muharram) ialah khitan, bangun rumah, pindah tempat tinggal (boyongan), tujuh bulanan (tingkeban). Dalam agama Islam melakukan pernikahan atau hajatan lainnya pada bulan Suro (Muharram) tidak dilarang karena dalam Islam tidak ada hari dan bulan yang tidak baik, bahkan bulan Suro (Muharram) termasuk bulan yang sangat mulia, yang menjadikan haram ialah ketika melaksanakan hajatan pada bulan Suro (Muharram) dan beranggapan akan terjadi cobaan atau peristiwa yang tidak baik, karena hal tersebut telah mendahului kehendak Allah SWT dan termasuk perbuatan syirik.

Praktik Moderasi Beragama melalui Seni Macapat dalam Peningkatkan Ekonomi Anggota Sumarjoko, Sumarjoko; Saifuddin, Khamim; Wulantoro, Tri; Ida Fitria, Yauma; Maduerawae, Mahdee
Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner Vol. 2 No. 2 April 2023: Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner
Publisher : Yayasan Azhar Amanaa Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59944/amorti.v2i2.87

This study reveals the phenomenon of the people of Kembang village, Nanggulan sub-district who make the macapat art tradition a medium of religious moderation and economic improfment its members. This theme is considered important considering the erosion of religious tolerance in society due to the rise of claims, stereotypes and blasphemy of religion. This is a field research with a case study approach. The results of the research concluded that: 1) the macapat tradition is the only art favored by Muslims and Catholics in the Nanggulan sub-district so that it is used as a medium of religious moderation, 2) the existence of the Anggoro Kasih community is the main patron who contributes to religious moderation through macapat performances with songs which breathes harmony, mutual cooperation and mutual respect between religious communities.

Hellenistic Rationality and the Formation of Sunni Legal Epistemology (800–1100 CE): A Postcolonial Methodological Inquiry Sumarjoko, Sumarjoko; Karim, Mohammad Abdul; Hak, Nurul
Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman Vol. 37 No. 1 (2026): Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman
Publisher : Universitas Islam Tribakti (UIT) Lirboyo Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33367/tribakti.v37i1.7529

This study argues that the formation of Sunni Islamic legal epistemology between the eighth and eleventh centuries CE cannot be adequately understood as a passive reception of Greco-Hellenistic rational traditions. Instead, it emerged through a complex process of internal methodological negotiation within the Islamic intellectual tradition. Rather than wholesale adoption of Aristotelian or Neoplatonic modes of reasoning, Muslim jurists selectively appropriated and critically reconfigured rational tools within the normative and epistemic framework of uṣūl al-fiqh, thereby generating a distinct form of legal rationality grounded in revelation, linguistic analysis, and juristic practice. Employing a postcolonial methodological inquiry, this study challenges earlier Orientalist interpretations that reduced Islamic jurisprudence to Roman or Hellenistic precedents, arguing that such accounts overlook the autonomy and internal dynamics of Islamic legal thought. The findings highlight the active epistemic agency of Muslim scholars who, through concepts such as qiyās and ʿillah, constructed a coherent system of legal reasoning while negotiating sociopolitical contexts, textual authority, and intellectual power structures. This study concludes that Sunni legal rationality developed through creative transformation rather than derivative reception, reaffirming the methodological autonomy and intellectual originality of Islamic law within the broader history of global legal traditions.

Hellenistic Rationality and the Formation of Sunni Legal Epistemology (800–1100 CE): A Postcolonial Methodological Inquiry Sumarjoko, Sumarjoko; Karim, Mohammad Abdul; Hak, Nurul
Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman Vol. 37 No. 1 (2026): Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman
Publisher : Universitas Islam Tribakti (UIT) Lirboyo Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33367/tribakti.v37i1.7529

This study argues that the formation of Sunni Islamic legal epistemology between the eighth and eleventh centuries CE cannot be adequately understood as a passive reception of Greco-Hellenistic rational traditions. Instead, it emerged through a complex process of internal methodological negotiation within the Islamic intellectual tradition. Rather than wholesale adoption of Aristotelian or Neoplatonic modes of reasoning, Muslim jurists selectively appropriated and critically reconfigured rational tools within the normative and epistemic framework of uṣūl al-fiqh, thereby generating a distinct form of legal rationality grounded in revelation, linguistic analysis, and juristic practice. Employing a postcolonial methodological inquiry, this study challenges earlier Orientalist interpretations that reduced Islamic jurisprudence to Roman or Hellenistic precedents, arguing that such accounts overlook the autonomy and internal dynamics of Islamic legal thought. The findings highlight the active epistemic agency of Muslim scholars who, through concepts such as qiyās and ʿillah, constructed a coherent system of legal reasoning while negotiating sociopolitical contexts, textual authority, and intellectual power structures. This study concludes that Sunni legal rationality developed through creative transformation rather than derivative reception, reaffirming the methodological autonomy and intellectual originality of Islamic law within the broader history of global legal traditions.

Bahasa Arab sebagai Fondasi Epistemologis dalam Formulasi Kaidah-Kaidah Fikih Sumarjoko, Sumarjoko; Ulfa, Hidayatun
JILSA (Jurnal Ilmu Linguistik dan Sastra Arab) Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): Oktober
Publisher : Fakultas Adab dan Humaniora UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/jilsa.2025.9.2.92-101

This study examines the epistemological role of the Arabic language in the formulation of al-qawāʿid al-fiqiyyah (legal maxims) and its implications for the validity and authority of Islamic law. The central inquiry addresses the extent to which Arabic functions not merely as a medium of expression, but as a methodological structure in the construction of legal maxims. Employing a qualitative library-based approach, this research applies linguistic and normative analysis to explore the relationship between the Qur’anic and Prophetic texts and the formulation of legal maxims. The findings demonstrate that the disciplines of naḥw (syntax) and ṣarf (morphology) play a crucial role in preserving semantic precision within the primary legal sources, which, through the process of takhrīj al-aḥkām (derivation of rulings) and systematic abstraction, give rise to universal legal principles (al-aḥkām al-kulliyyah) articulated as legal maxims. The concise yet semantically dense structure of Arabic enables the formulation of comprehensive principles encompassing diverse subsidiary legal cases. The Arabic redaction of al-qawāʿid al-fiqiyyah constitutes an integral component of their normative construction and legal legitimacy, while translation functions primarily as an explanatory instrument within pedagogical contexts.

Title

Found 5 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 5 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 5 Documents
Search