Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Saniri

Keabsahan Surat Edaran Yang Muatan Materinya Bersifat Pengaturan Dan Sanksi Pattinasarany, Yohanes
Jurnal Saniri Vol 3, No 1 (2022): Volume 3 Nomor 1, November 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/saniri.v3i1.1224

Abstract

Today's increasingly rapid development of government practices, the government often makes circular laws which are used as the legal basis for legalizing government actions or actions in certain areas of government affairs. However, the act of forming a circular letter in question sometimes creates legal problems because it is not in accordance with the nature of the circular letter in question because the material content of the circular letter is of a general regulatory nature and even contains legal sanctions. Even though the existence of a Circular Letter as part of a policy regulation that contains information or official notices that are technical guidelines in carrying out a government affair. The contents of a Circular Letter are organizational internal technical guidelines, which are different from Laws and Regulations which contain generally accepted regulatory material (into and outside the scope of the institution that makes it) and contain sanctions as a form of coercive power, so that if there is a circular letter whose material content is regulations and contains sanctions, the circular letter is considered to have no validity, because it is not in accordance with its nature, function and position.
Legitimasi Penetapan Status Negeri Di Kecamatan Teon, Nila, Serua, Kabupaten Maluku Tengah Sebagai Desa Adat Lelapary, Elfira; Bakarbessy, Andress Deny; Pattinasarany, Yohanes
Jurnal Saniri Vol 4, No 2 (2024): Volume 4 Nomor 2, Mei 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/saniri.v4i2.2177

Abstract

      Even though it is recognized, the legitimacy of traditional village status is often a problem. The determination of countries as traditional villages without traditional territories or petuanan is as regulated in Article 97 of Law Number 6 of 2014 concerning Villages, that one of the requirements for establishing a traditional village is that the customary law community unit must have a territory or customary area. However, the regional government of Central Maluku Regency has designated the Negeris in the TNS sub-district as traditional villages but do not have territory or customary areas. There are two problem formulations that will be discussed in this paper, namely whether the determination of the status of the lands in Teon, Nila, Serua sub-districts, Central Maluku district has legitimacy as traditional villages without having customary territories?, and what are the legal consequences if the status of the lands in Teon, Nila, Serua sub-districts, Central Maluku district has legitimacy as a traditional village without having a traditional territory     Normative research was conducted to analyze the application of positive legal norms in traditional village legitimacy policies. The government's decision to legitimize the status of traditional villages is crucial to respecting the recognition and maintaining the identity of traditional villages, in accordance with existing norms.     The results of this research are that the determination of State status in Teon, Nila, Serua Districts, Central Maluku Regency does not have legitimacy so the result is null and void.
Pengaturan Penetapan Batas Pengelolaan Wilayah Laut Oleh Pemerintah Daerah Provinsi Maluku Lawalata, Carmel Rafaela; Lekipiouw, Sherlock Halmes; Pattinasarany, Yohanes
Jurnal Saniri Vol 5, No 1 (2024): Volume 5 Nomor 1, November 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/saniri.v5i1.2516

Abstract

Article 27 and Article 28 of Law Number 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government has given authority to provincial regions and provincial regions characterized by islands to manage natural resources in the sea in their territory. However, in its implementation, the Maluku Provincial Government has not yet established the Maluku Province Marine Area Management Boundary. Maluku Province is also a provincial area characterized by islands.The method used to analyze and discuss the problem is Normative Juridical. The problem studied in this research is the responsibility of the Regional Government of Maluku Province in determining the boundaries of the marine management area of Maluku Province and the legal consequences if Maluku Province does not determine its marine boundaries. The results showed that the responsibility of the Provincial Government in determining the boundaries of marine area management is regulated in Article 27 and Article 28 of Law Number 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government. But in reality the authority has not been implemented by the Maluku Provincial Government. The legal consequences if the Maluku Provincial Government does not determine the boundaries of marine area management are the absence of legal certainty regarding the boundaries of marine area management as far as 12 (twelve) miles from Maluku Province and potentially regions bordering Maluku Province can issue permits to carry out management in marine areas that should belong to Maluku Province. sea area that should belong to Maluku Province.
Keterbukaan Dan Akuntabilitas Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Desa Lermatang Kecamatan Tanimbar Selatan Kabupaten Kepulauan Tanimbar Bulohroy, Flora Tiabetris Celsa; Mustamu, Julista; Pattinasarany, Yohanes
Jurnal Saniri Vol 3, No 2 (2023): Volume 3 Nomor 2, Mei 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/saniri.v3i2.1619

Abstract

Introduction: Openness and Accountability are principles in the administration of government, including in the administration of village government, so that every government administrator, including the village government of Lermatang, South Tanimbar sub-district, Keulauan Tanimbar Regency, is obliged to apply the principles of openness and accountability in the process of Government Administration, Village Development, Community Development and Community Empowerment. In the explanation of Article 24 letter d of Law no. 6 of 2014 that Openness is a principle that opens itself to the right of the community to obtain correct, honest, and non-discriminatory information regarding the Implementation of Village Government by taking into account the provisions of the legislation. While accountability according to the explanation of Article 24 letter g of Law no. 6 of 2014 is the principle that determines that every activity and the final result of the implementation of Village Government activities must be accountable to the Village community in accordance with the provisions of the legislation. In the administration of village government, the village government as the organizer of the village government in carrying out the tasks and authorities given must be open and responsible for the actions or actions taken. However, the facts found are that the Lematang Village Government does not comply with the rules as mentioned above, and/or does not apply the Principles/Principles of Openness and Accountability in the Village Administration process.Purposes of the Research: To research and analyze the Implementation of Government in Lematang Village, South Tanimbar Tanimbar, Tanimbar Islands Regency, it is carried out in an open and accountable manner and the legal consequences for the Government in Lermatang Village, South Tanimbar District, Tanimbar Islands Regency if it is not open and accountable in the administration of government.Methods of the Research: The method used is a normative juridical research method using descriptive analysis of legal materialsResults of the Research:  The results of the study indicate that in the administration of government in the village of Lematang, South Tanimbar District, Tanimbar Regency, the Lematang village government does not apply openness and accountability in carrying out all government affairs that are under the authority of the village. Therefore, the legal consequence for the Lematang village government if it is not open and accountable in the administration of village government is that it should be subject to administrative sanctions (dismissal) from position as village head.
Rekomendasi Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum Kepada Komisi Pemilihan Umum Dalam Menangani Pelanggaran Pemilu Pasca Penetapan Hasil Perolehan Suara Secara Nasional Baljanan, Gilbert Marc; Lekipiouw, Sherlock Halmes; Pattinasarany, Yohanes
Jurnal Saniri Vol 5, No 2 (2025): Volume 5 Nomor 2, Mei 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/saniri.v5i2.3165

Abstract

Election administration violations, based on article 460 of the Election Law, Bawaslu has a maximum working time of 14 days to issue recommendations or decisions. Bawaslu's recommendations must be followed up by the KPU by issuing a decision letter no later than 3 days, as explained in Article 462. This problem occurs when the national vote results have been determined, then any dispute that occurs becomes the domain of the Constitutional Court. However, if a violation of election administration is found or reported, it must be followed up and decided by Bawaslu because it is based on article 454 paragraph 6 of the Election Law. The problem discussed by the author is Bawaslu's recommendation to be followed up by the KPU to change the determination of vote acquisition and the legal consequences that will be given if Bawaslu's recommendation is not followed up by the KPU.This writing uses a normative juridical research type, with a statutory regulation approach, a conceptual approach and a case approach.The research results show that regarding the legal force of Bawaslu's recommendation to change the vote tally, Bawaslu certainly has that legal force, because it is not legally prohibited. In connection with the follow-up to Bawaslu's recommendations to the KPU regarding violations of election administration, if the recommendations given by Bawaslu are not followed up by the KPU, they will be faced with various consequences, namely that the KPU can be reported by Bawaslu because it is related to the election organizer's code of ethics.