Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

Voices from Indonesian Legislative on Religious Education Policy Jamhari, Jamhari; Nisa, Yunita Faela
Studia Islamika Vol. 28 No. 1 (2021): Studia Islamika
Publisher : Center for Study of Islam and Society (PPIM) Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36712/sdi.v28i1.20515

Abstract

Religious violent extremism remains a problem for Indonesia. Recently, three consecutive attacks carried out by violent religious extremists — a suicide bombing in front of a Cathedral Church in Makassar South Sulawesi, the discovery of several prepared high explosive bombs in Condet Jakarta, and a female lone wolf attack on the Indonesian Police Criminal Investigation Agency — shocked the public (Fakta-data di Balik Bom Bunuh Diri, 29 Maret 2021; Polisi sebut Terduga Teroris Condet & Bekasi, 2021; Teroris Penyerang Mabes Polri, 2021). It may not be surprising since there were some early indications from various studies that some Indonesian people still have religious attitudes and behaviors that are exclusive, closed, anti-citizenship, anti-state, and even pro-violence (PPIM, 2016, 2017, 2018; Puspidep, 2017, 2018). The PPIM study results (2018) show that around 58.5 percent of students tend to be religious radical, and 51.1 percent tend to be intolerant to differences within Muslim groups. Then, as many as 34.3 percent of students are intolerant to non-Muslim groups. Radical views that are intolerant toward those who are different are the first step to violent extremism. These studies are a reminder that violent extremism is a problem for all of Indonesian society. Therefore, PPIM surveyed the perceptions of the public, students, teachers, and Indonesian Members of Parliament on violent extremism.
Uji Validitas Konstruk dengan CFA dan Pelaporannya Umar, Jahja; Nisa, Yunita Faela
JP3I (Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia) Vol. 9 No. 2 (2020): JP3I
Publisher : FAKULTAS PSIKOLOGI UIN SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH JAKARTA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jp3i.v9i2.16964

Abstract

Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) is the most reliable method of construct validity analysis in the fields of psychology, education and social sciences. From the author's observations on research articles as well as bachelor and graduate theses, and dissertations using CFA, it was found that there are a lot of misunderstandings and incompleteness in reporting CFA analysis. This paper is intended as an effort to improve this situation and provide recommendations in reporting data analysis using CFA. At the very least, this article is to show the important things that must be considered in understanding and using CFA and test theory in general.