Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.829
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Mulawarman Law Review Jurnal Penelitian Serambi Hukum AML/CFT Journal The Journal of Anti Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism The Prosecutor Law Review
Yanuar, Muh. Afdal
Unknown Affiliation
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 8 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 8 Documents
Search

 1 
PEMAKNAAN UNSUR PENGETAHUAN DALAM DELIK PENCUCIAN UANG: TELAAH KRITIS TERHADAP DOKTRIN PRO PARTE DOLUS PRO PARTE CULPA Yanuar, Muh. Afdal
The Prosecutor Law Review Vol 2 No 2 (2024): The Prosecutor Law Review
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Penegakan Hukum, Kejaksaan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64843/prolev.v2i2.38

Abstract

Tulisan ini dilatarbelakangi dengan keberadaan doktrin proparte dolus proparte culpa yang jamak dijadikan sebagai landasan dalam memaknai unsur ‘pengetahuan’ pada delik pencucian uang. Doktrin tersebut menghendaki agar ancaman pidana antara delik ‘lalai’ dan ‘sengaja’ disamakan, di kala jenis kesalahan hanya meliputi ‘lalai’ dan ‘sengaja’. Padahal seharusnya delik ‘lalai’ haruslah lebih ringan ancaman pidananya daripada ‘sengaja’. Melalui tulisan ini, akan dibahas perihal, relevansi doktrin proparte dolus proparte culpa terhadap pemaknaan, dan konsep yang ideal dalam memaknai, unsur pengetahuan dalam delik pencucian uang. Tulisan ini menggunakan penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual dan perundang-undangan. Melalui tulisan ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa menjadikan doktrin pro parte dolus pro parte culpa sebagai konsep yang mendasari pemahaman atas unsur pengetahuan pada delik pencucian uang merupakan hal yang tidak relevan, dikarenakan doktrin tersebut mempersamakan ancaman pidana ‘sengaja’ dengan ‘lalai’. Padahal seharusnya ancaman pidana ‘lalai’ lebih ringan daripada ‘sengaja’, di kala jenis kesalahan hanya meliputi ‘sengaja’ dan ‘lalai’. Selanjutnya, doktrin ideal untuk dijadikan sebagai pijakan dalam memahami unsur pengetahuan dalam delik pencucian uang adalah doktrin een bijzondere vorm van schuld (bentuk kesalahan istimewa) yang disebut dengan onverschillingheid voor de rechtsbelangen van anderen, yang di dalamnya meliputi elemen sengaja dan lalai (yang ancaman pidananya disamakan), tetapi jenis kesalahan ini sendiri bukan ‘sengaja’, bukan pula ‘lalai’.
Laundering of Proceeds Forest Destruction and Narcotics Crimes: A Resolution of The Conflict Norms Yanuar, Muh. Afdal
Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review VOLUME 8 ISSUE 1 JUNE 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v8i1.1044

Abstract

This paper will explain about the conflict of norms that arise because there are 2 (two) similar provisions (offenses) in different laws, related to 'laundering of proceeds of the forest destruction crime ' and 'laundering of proceeds of narcotics crime'. Furthermore, it is also discussed which principles must be applied to resolve the conflict of norms, and which provisions (offenses) must be applied in that case. This paper uses a normative research with a conceptual approach, statutory approach, and case approach. Through this paper it is also concluded that in case of a conflict of norms between special norms and other special norms, the most relevant principle to be applied is the juridische/systematische specialiteit principle, and in the context of the conflict of norms that occurred in case of 'laundering of proceeds of the forest destruction crime ' and 'laundering of proceeds of narcotics crime', the more relevant provision (offense) applied is the 'Money Laundering Offense' as regulated in the Money Laundering Law.
Politik Hukum Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Pengujian Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Yanuar, Muh. Afdal
JURNAL PENELITIAN SERAMBI HUKUM Vol 17 No 01 (2024): Jurnal Penelitian Serambi Hukum Vol 17 No 01 Tahun 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Batik Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59582/sh.v17i01.908

Abstract

This paper aims to describe the legal considerations that underlie the authority of the Constitutional Court on judicial review of government regulations in substitute of law, and legal policy of the authority of the Constitutional Court on judicial review of government regulations in lieu of law.This is based on a situation where the judicial review authority by the Constitutional Court as regulated in the Constitution only contains the review of the law to the Constitution. However, in its dynamics, through the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 138/PUU-VII/2009, it has expanded the meaning of the ‘law’, to include the government regulations in substitute of law, which some experts view that the government regulations in lieu of law is a ‘law’ in a material sense (wet in materiele zijn). This paper uses normative research. In this paper, it is stated that the decision of the constitutional court to make government regulations in lieu of law as an object that can be reviewed in the Constitutional Court, is an embodiment of the philosophy of judicial activism, which reflects the responsiveness of the Constitutional Court to the legal vacuum of reviewing government regulations in lieu of law, if it is judged to be formally or materially defects by parties who have legal standing over that. The results of the research presented in this paper are, first, the legal considerations so that the Constitutional Court has the authority to review the government regulations in lieu of laws as stated in the Constitutional Court's Decision Number 138/PUU-VII/2009, which abstractly refers to the nature of the content of the government regulations in lieu of laws which is the same as the law. Second, the authority of the Constitutional Court in judicial review, which is also authorized to review the constitutionality of government regulations in lieu of laws, since the Constitutional Court Decision Number 138/PUU-VII/2009, is a form of transformation of authority that is realized through the legal politics on the authority of the Constitutional Court without going through legislative process in parliament
Kewenangan Penyidik Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Dalam Menyidik Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Yanuar, Muh. Afdal
AML/CFT Journal : The Journal Of Anti Money Laundering And Countering The Financing Of Terrorism Vol 1 No 1 (2022): Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Pencucian Uang untuk Ekonomi Hijau
Publisher : Pusat Pelaporan dan Analisis Transaksi Keuangan (PPATK)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (755.552 KB) | DOI: 10.59593/amlcft.2022.v1i1.4

Abstract

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 15/PUU-XIX/2021 telah menyebabkan transformasi normatif terhadap pengaturan kewenangan penyidikan tindak pidana pencucian uang. Pada awalnya melalui penjelasan Pasal 74 UU TPPU, penyidik ​​yang diberi wewenang untuk menyidik tindak pidana pencucian uang dibatasi. Namun melalui putusan MK tersebut, semua penyidik ​​yang berwenang menyidik ​​tindak pidana asal dari TPPU, secara mutatis mutandis, diberi kewenangan untuk dapat melakukan penyidikan TPPU. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif, dengan menggunakan pendekatan konseptual, perundang-undangan, dan kasus. Melalui penelitian ini, dapat dinyatakan bahwa penyidik ​​Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) baru memiliki kewenangan menyidik tindak pidana pencucian uang, sejak Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 15/PUU-XIX/2021. Selanjutnya, semua penyidik ​​yang berwenang menyidik tindak pidana pencucian uang pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 15/PUU-XIX/2021, antara lain Penyidik ​​OJK, secara mutatis mutandis, juga berwenang menyidik tindak pidana pencucian uang yang terjadi sebelum diucapkannya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 15/PUU-XIX/2021 tersebut.
Laundering of Proceeds Forest Destruction and Narcotics Crimes: A Resolution of The Conflict Norms Yanuar, Muh. Afdal
Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review Vol 8 No 1: Mulawarman Law Review - June 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v8i1.1044

Abstract

This paper will explain about the conflict of norms that arise because there are 2 (two) similar provisions (offenses) in different laws, related to 'laundering of proceeds of the forest destruction crime ' and 'laundering of proceeds of narcotics crime'. Furthermore, it is also discussed which principles must be applied to resolve the conflict of norms, and which provisions (offenses) must be applied in that case. This paper uses a normative research with a conceptual approach, statutory approach, and case approach. Through this paper it is also concluded that in case of a conflict of norms between special norms and other special norms, the most relevant principle to be applied is the juridische/systematische specialiteit principle, and in the context of the conflict of norms that occurred in case of 'laundering of proceeds of the forest destruction crime ' and 'laundering of proceeds of narcotics crime', the more relevant provision (offense) applied is the 'Money Laundering Offense' as regulated in the Money Laundering Law.
Doktrin Juridische/Systematische Specialiteit dalam Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Sumbangan Dana Kampanye dan Pencucian Uang Yanuar, Muh. Afdal
AML/CFT Journal : The Journal Of Anti Money Laundering And Countering The Financing Of Terrorism Vol 3 No 2 (2025): Membongkar Lapisan Baru Kejahatan Keuangan: Integrasi Kajian Hukum, Sosial, dan T
Publisher : Pusat Pelaporan dan Analisis Transaksi Keuangan (PPATK)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59593/amlcft.2025.v3i2.183

Abstract

The principle of lex specialis derogat legi generali frequently proves inadequate in resolving normative conflicts, particularly between Article 339(1)(c) of the General Election Law and provisions in the Money Laundering Law (UU TPPU). The present article examines the use of the doctrine of juridische/systematische specialiteit as a more effective approach to addressing such legal overlaps. The objective of this study is to ascertain which legal norms apply in instances where the acceptance of campaign contributions intersects with money laundering offences. Utilising normative legal research methodologies, bolstered by conceptual and juridical analysis, this study ascertains that the doctrine of juridische/systematische specialiteit confers enhanced legal certainty in resolving conflicts between overlapping criminal provisions. This doctrine is consistent with the principles that guide the interpretation of criminal norms and ensures a more precise application of the law. The article concludes that, in cases involving the proceeds of suspected money laundering from election campaign contributions, the provisions of the Money Laundering Act should take precedence over those in the Election Act. This approach not only supports systematic legal interpretation but also strengthens the legal framework in combating financial crimes involving political funding.
PENERAPAN DOKTRIN JURIDISCHE/SYSTEMATISCHE SPECIALITEIT TERHADAP IRISAN ANTARA TINDAK PIDANA PENERIMAAN SUMBANGAN DANA KAMPANYE PEMILU DENGAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG Yanuar, Muh. Afdal
The Prosecutor Law Review Vol 3 No 2 (2025): The Prosecutor Law Review
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Penegakan Hukum, Kejaksaan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64843/prolev.v3i2.51

Abstract

In reality, it is not uncommon for lex specialis derogat legi generali principle to be unable to resolve the problem of conflict between special norms and other special norms, inter alia, between the Article 339 paragraph (1) letter c of the Election Law provision and criminal acts provision in AML Law. This article aims to analyze the rationality of juridische/systematische specialiteit doctrine as an appropriate concept in analyzing these problems, as well as determining the provisions that should be applied in the intersection between criminal acts related to election campaign fund donations and money laundering crimes based on the juridische/systematische specialiteit doctrine. This research was using a normative research method with a conceptual and statutory approach. Through this article, it is concluded that juridische/systematische specialiteit doctrine is used as the right concept in analyzing conflicts between special norms and other special norms because this concept more clearly describes legal certainty in determining which special norms must be enforced, and in line with the 'basis for interpreting criminal norms' in interpreting a criminal law norm. Furthermore, based on the juridische/systematische specialiteit doctrine, the provisions in the AML Law, and not the provisions in the Election Law, should be the choice to be implemented in the event of 'laundering of proceeds' in the receipt of campaign funds.
Kewenangan Penyidik Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Dalam Menyidik Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Yanuar, Muh. Afdal
AML/CFT Journal : The Journal Of Anti Money Laundering And Countering The Financing Of Terrorism Vol 1 No 1 (2022): Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Pencucian Uang untuk Ekonomi Hijau
Publisher : Pusat Pelaporan dan Analisis Transaksi Keuangan (PPATK)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59593/amlcft.2022.v1i1.4

Abstract

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 15/PUU-XIX/2021 telah menyebabkan transformasi normatif terhadap pengaturan kewenangan penyidikan tindak pidana pencucian uang. Pada awalnya melalui penjelasan Pasal 74 UU TPPU, penyidik ​​yang diberi wewenang untuk menyidik tindak pidana pencucian uang dibatasi. Namun melalui putusan MK tersebut, semua penyidik ​​yang berwenang menyidik ​​tindak pidana asal dari TPPU, secara mutatis mutandis, diberi kewenangan untuk dapat melakukan penyidikan TPPU. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif, dengan menggunakan pendekatan konseptual, perundang-undangan, dan kasus. Melalui penelitian ini, dapat dinyatakan bahwa penyidik ​​Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) baru memiliki kewenangan menyidik tindak pidana pencucian uang, sejak Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 15/PUU-XIX/2021. Selanjutnya, semua penyidik ​​yang berwenang menyidik tindak pidana pencucian uang pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 15/PUU-XIX/2021, antara lain Penyidik ​​OJK, secara mutatis mutandis, juga berwenang menyidik tindak pidana pencucian uang yang terjadi sebelum diucapkannya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 15/PUU-XIX/2021 tersebut.
Co-Authors