Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.888
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Andalas Journal of International Studies Jurnal Sosiologi Andalas Frequency of International Relations (FETRIAN) Journal of Paradiplomacy and City Networks
Putri, Ardila
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Diplomasi Publik dan Soft Power: Sama atau Berbeda? Trisni, Sofia; Putri, Ardila
Andalas Journal of International Studies (AJIS) Vol 12, No 1 (2023): Published in May 2023
Publisher : Andalas Institute of International Studies UNAND

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/ajis.12.1.1-12.2023

Abstract

Public diplomacy has been a long-standing practice that continues to this day. Both developed and developing countries aim to design public diplomacy programs that are well-received by their target audience. Public diplomacy is closely linked to the concept of soft power, which became popular after Joseph Nye coined the term in the 1990s. Countries implement public diplomacy because they believe it can enhance their soft power. In Indonesia, the relationship between public diplomacy and soft power has been widely discussed in academic articles. However, there still needs to be a consensus on whether the two concepts are the same or different. This article aims to clarify their relationship using a literature review of articles written by leading scholars in the field. Based on the review, it can be concluded that public diplomacy and soft power are different but interconnected. Public diplomacy is often implemented to promote or generate soft power.
Implementation of A Village Fund Allocation Management for Sustainable Rural Development in Sigaluh Sub-District, Banjarnegara Kurniawan, Agung; Primadata, Ankarlina Pandu; Lestari, Soraya Fajar Ayu; Putri, Ardila
Jurnal Sosiologi Andalas Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Andalas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/jsa.10.1.18-29.2024

Abstract

Village governments are responsible for distributing village funds. This study aims to explain how village funds are managed to achieve sustainable development by allocating them to four sectors: village government, village development, community empowerment, and emergency disaster management. Effectiveness measurement indicators include goal achievement, integration, and adaptation to the results of achievements. Data was obtained from 14 villages in Sigaluh District, Banjarnegara Regency, and a qualitative method was used. The research was conducted through interview methods and literature studies on government reports on the allocation of village funds that each village has implemented. The results showed that the village funds in Sigaluh District were distributed in the four areas based on the community's priority needs that were agreed upon at Musrembang. The priority of the village government administration is to provide more effective and efficient services to the community. Village development focuses on physical and non-physical development, including increasing village road access and providing Posyandu assistance to reduce stunting. The allocation of funds in community empowerment is focused on the agriculture, fisheries, and UMKM sectors to support village food security. Emergency disaster management is focused on handling COVID-19 and disaster mitigation. Local village governments play important and crucialrole in sustainable development in rural areas as they control the implementation of various programs. The allocation of village funds in the Sigaluh sub-district is designed to be carried out with the principle of frugality, directed at achieving goals and benefits for the village community, and is well-controlled.
Evaluation of Indonesia-South Korea Cooperation in the Saemaul Undong Program in Sumbermulyo Village, Bantul, through a Participatory Approach Agustiana, Radika Ayu; Anggraeni, Silvia Dian; Putri, Ardila; Hazmi, Adli
Journal of Paradiplomacy and City Networks Vol. 1 No. 2: December 2022
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (249.049 KB) | DOI: 10.18196/jpcn.v1i2.19

Abstract

In the 1970s, under President Park Chung Hee, the Saemaul Undong Movement was established to overcome the economic issues in underdeveloped and impoverished rural areas. Saemaul Undong is based on three principles: diligence, self-help, and cooperation. The program’s success in South Korea inspired the government to promote it to other countries, especially those in need. Sumbermulyo Village was one of three villages in the Yogyakarta Special Region (DIY) selected in 2015 when an MoU on collaboration with Saemaul Undong was signed between Indonesia and South Korea. The study revealed several differences in perceptions among the various stakeholders involved in the implementation of Saemaul Undong in Sumbermulyo Village, especially concerning funding, using several indicators of a participatory approach elaborated with in-depth interviews from relevant sources. The training program designed to alter people’s worldviews was sometimes criticized for taking too long to produce desirable results. The implementation deviated from the plan as a result. 
Green Climate Fund (GCF) sebagai Organisasi Internasional Alternatif: Evolusi, Otonomi, dan Peran dalam Tata Kelola Iklim Global Putri, Ardila
Frequency of International Relations (FETRIAN) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Andalas Institute of International Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/fetrian.8.1.71-111.2026

Abstract

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) was established in 2010 under the framework of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in response to growing demands for a more equitable climate finance mechanism for developing countries. Beyond its role as a financing mechanism, the GCF introduces institutional innovations that challenge conventional models of international organizations through equal representation between developed and developing countries, a country-driven approach, and an explicit commitment to climate justice. This article examines how and in what sense the GCF can be understood as an alternative international organization within contemporary global climate governance. Using a qualitative literature-based approach, informed by theories of international organizations and alternative multilateralism, the article analyzes the GCF's institutional design, legitimacy, and governance arrangements. Limited comparison with conventional international organizations, including the World Bank, IMF, GEF, and UNDP, is employed as an analytical device to clarify the distinctive characteristics of the GCF rather than as the primary focus of the study. The article argues that while the GCF fulfills the formal characteristics of an international organization, it simultaneously introduces institutional innovations that reconfigure representation, participation, and decision-making within global climate governance. Nevertheless, these innovations remain constrained by donor influence, institutional dependencies, and broader structural inequalities. The article concludes that the GCF represents an important institutional experiment that illustrates the ongoing transformation of international organizations in a post-hegemonic era.
Co-Authors Agung Kurniawan Agustiana, Radika Ayu Anggraeni, Silvia Dian Hazmi, Adli Lestari, Soraya Fajar Ayu Primadata, Ankarlina Pandu Trisni, Sofia