Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Diplomasi Publik dan Soft Power: Sama atau Berbeda? Trisni, Sofia; Putri, Ardila
Andalas Journal of International Studies (AJIS) Vol 12, No 1 (2023): Published in May 2023
Publisher : Andalas Institute of International Studies UNAND

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/ajis.12.1.1-12.2023

Abstract

Public diplomacy has been a long-standing practice that continues to this day. Both developed and developing countries aim to design public diplomacy programs that are well-received by their target audience. Public diplomacy is closely linked to the concept of soft power, which became popular after Joseph Nye coined the term in the 1990s. Countries implement public diplomacy because they believe it can enhance their soft power. In Indonesia, the relationship between public diplomacy and soft power has been widely discussed in academic articles. However, there still needs to be a consensus on whether the two concepts are the same or different. This article aims to clarify their relationship using a literature review of articles written by leading scholars in the field. Based on the review, it can be concluded that public diplomacy and soft power are different but interconnected. Public diplomacy is often implemented to promote or generate soft power.
Implementation of A Village Fund Allocation Management for Sustainable Rural Development in Sigaluh Sub-District, Banjarnegara Kurniawan, Agung; Primadata, Ankarlina Pandu; Lestari, Soraya Fajar Ayu; Putri, Ardila
Jurnal Sosiologi Andalas Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Andalas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/jsa.10.1.18-29.2024

Abstract

Village governments are responsible for distributing village funds. This study aims to explain how village funds are managed to achieve sustainable development by allocating them to four sectors: village government, village development, community empowerment, and emergency disaster management. Effectiveness measurement indicators include goal achievement, integration, and adaptation to the results of achievements. Data was obtained from 14 villages in Sigaluh District, Banjarnegara Regency, and a qualitative method was used. The research was conducted through interview methods and literature studies on government reports on the allocation of village funds that each village has implemented. The results showed that the village funds in Sigaluh District were distributed in the four areas based on the community's priority needs that were agreed upon at Musrembang. The priority of the village government administration is to provide more effective and efficient services to the community. Village development focuses on physical and non-physical development, including increasing village road access and providing Posyandu assistance to reduce stunting. The allocation of funds in community empowerment is focused on the agriculture, fisheries, and UMKM sectors to support village food security. Emergency disaster management is focused on handling COVID-19 and disaster mitigation. Local village governments play important and crucialrole in sustainable development in rural areas as they control the implementation of various programs. The allocation of village funds in the Sigaluh sub-district is designed to be carried out with the principle of frugality, directed at achieving goals and benefits for the village community, and is well-controlled.