Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM INDONESIA Mazahib: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam
Nugrahenti, Meydora Cahya
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Reconstruction of Arbitration Agreement Arrangements to Prevent Pathological Arbitration Clauses in Indonesia Nugrahenti, Meydora Cahya; Herliana, Herliana; Sugiharti, Rr. Retno
Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia Vol 7, No 3 (2025)
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jphi.v7i3.405-427

Abstract

Pathological arbitration clauses can hinder the arbitration process and open up opportunities for the parties to avoid arbitration or challenge its decision. These clauses may arise due to deliberate intent or a lack of understanding on the part of the parties. Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution (AAPS Law) does regulate arbitration agreements, but it is not comprehensive in preventing the emergence of pathological clauses. This study aims to identify forms of pathological arbitration clauses that hinder the effectiveness of arbitration and to formulate a reconstruction of arbitration agreement regulations to prevent them in Indonesia. The research method used is juridical-normative with an emphasis on legal norms as the main object. The data used consists of primary and secondary legal materials through legislative, analytical, comparative, and conceptual approaches. The results of the study show that pathological arbitration clauses hinder arbitration because they contain ambiguities, such as unclear arbitration authority to resolve disputes, the existence of options for the parties to choose a court, and the appointment of unavailable arbitrators. To prevent pathological arbitration clauses, Article 9 of the AAPS Law needs to be reconstructed by including arbitration clause regulations that explicitly state the authority of arbitration without exception. The conclusion of this study is that there are pathological clauses in the agreement and therefore the reconstruction of Article 9 of the AAPS Law is carried out by providing legal certainty on the pactum de compromittendo in the arbitration agreement.
Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution in Medical Disputes Within Sharia-Compliant Hospitals: The Role of Good Faith in Balancing Patient Justice and Professional Protection Herliana, Herliana; Nugrahenti, Meydora Cahya
Mazahib Vol 24 No 2 (2025): VOLUME 24, ISSUE 2, 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah UINSI Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21093/mj.v24i2.10308

Abstract

The expansion of Sharia-compliant hospitals in Indonesia requires a context-specific mechanism for resolving medical disputes. Law No. 17 of 2023 mandates Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), including arbitration, that aligns with Islamic legal principles—particularly good faith. This principle, rooted in sincerity, fairness, and respect, underpins Islamic jurisprudence and ensures ethical dispute resolution. This study proposes an ADR framework, specifically arbitration, for Sharia-compliant hospitals grounded in good-faith principles that safeguard patients’ rights while protecting healthcare professionals from unjust claims. Integrating values such as niyyah (sincere intent), ṣidq (honesty), adl (justice), huqūq (respect for rights), amānah (responsibility), and avoidance of ḍarar (harm) fosters trust, fairness, and accountability, thereby sustaining an ethical healthcare environment responsive to both patient welfare and practitioner integrity.
Co-Authors Herliana Herliana Sugiharti, Rr. Retno