Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Blantika : Multidisciplinary Journal Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia
Sibuea, Hotma
Unknown Affiliation
Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Veterinary

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Pengaturan Periodesasi Masa Jabatan Anggota DPR RI dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia Sebagai Negara Hukum Demokratis Afandi Sahidin, Ihtisab; Sibuea, Hotma; Adianto Mau, Hedwig
Blantika: Multidisciplinary Journal Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): Reguler Issue
Publisher : PT. Publikasiku Academic Solution

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57096/blantika.v3i2.272

Abstract

Di Indonesia, pembatasan kekuasaan dalam jabatan publik, khususnya anggota Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR), menjadi isu penting untuk mencegah penyalahgunaan kekuasaan dan memastikan keadilan dalam sistem demokrasi. Meskipun terdapat pembatasan masa jabatan untuk Presiden, anggota DPR tidak memiliki pembatasan yang sama, yang dapat berakibat pada praktik korupsi dan perilaku tidak etis lainnya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaturan masa jabatan anggota DPR Republik Indonesia dan urgensi pembatasan masa jabatan dalam konteks negara hukum yang berkeadilan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif, yang mengutamakan penggunaan norma hukum yang berlaku serta dilengkapi dengan wawancara dengan narasumber terkait. Data dikumpulkan dari sumber hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ketidakadaan pembatasan masa jabatan anggota DPR berpotensi menimbulkan kekosongan hukum dan penyalahgunaan kekuasaan. Penelitian ini juga mengidentifikasi perlunya regulasi yang lebih ketat untuk mendorong regenerasi kepemimpinan dan meningkatkan akuntabilitas anggota legislatif. Pembatasan masa jabatan anggota DPR sangat penting untuk menciptakan iklim demokrasi yang sehat dan mencegah penyalahgunaan kekuasaan. Regenerasi kepemimpinan di DPR akan membantu meningkatkan kinerja legislatif dan memperkuat prinsip-prinsip demokrasi di Indonesia.
Reimagining Legislative Representation in Indonesia: Integrating Regional Interests within Constitutional Checks and Balances: English Sibuea, Hotma; Ricky Thio; Amelia Syauket
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i1.5791

Abstract

The Regional Representative Council (DPD), established after Indonesia's third constitutional amendment, was designed with dual missions: providing checks and balances against the House of Representatives (DPR) and channeling regional aspirations into central government policies. However, the DPD's limited authority has compromised its effectiveness in fulfilling these missions. This study examines whether the DPD's current regulatory framework reflects balanced power relations and effective checks and balances while representing regional interests in central government policies. It also explores potential restructuring of DPD-DPR authority to achieve these objectives. Using juridical-normative methodology, this research reveals that Indonesia's post-amendment representative system reflects asymmetric weak bicameralism, failing to achieve balanced DPD-DPR power relations or effective checks and balances. This weakness consequently undermines regional interest representation in central policy-making. The study proposes asymmetric strong bicameralism as a solution for achieving balanced power relations while ensuring regional representation. This reconstruction necessitates amending Law Number 17 of 2014 to strengthen the DPD's position as a regional representative institution.
Telemedicine Regulation in Indonesia: Legal Frameworks, Challenges, and Future Directions Mutiah, Fifi; Sibuea, Hotma; Candra, Mardi
Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia
Publisher : Riviera Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58344/jmi.v4i4.2267

Abstract

The rapid advancement of digital technology has positioned telemedicine as a transformative solution to address healthcare disparities, particularly in geographically fragmented regions like Indonesia. Despite its potential, telemedicine adoption in Indonesia faces significant challenges, including regulatory ambiguities, inadequate infrastructure, and concerns over data security and professional accountability. While recent legal frameworks, such as Law No. 17 of 2023 and Government Regulation No. 28 of 2024, aim to address these issues, their implementation remains inconsistent, risking patient safety and trust. This study fills critical gaps in existing literature by integrating the rule of law and health justice frameworks to evaluate Indonesia’s telemedicine regulations—a novel approach absent in prior works. The study addresses two key research questions: (1) How does Indonesia’s current legal framework regulate telemedicine, and what gaps exist in practice? (2) How can telemedicine regulations align with the principles of a legal state (Rechtsstaat) to ensure accountability and equity? Employing a normative juridical methodology, the research combines legislative analysis, conceptual evaluation, and case studies, including the Dr. Damar case (2021), to assess regulatory coherence. Findings reveal significant gaps, including unclear liability standards for misdiagnoses, weak enforcement of data privacy laws, and disparities in rural telemedicine access. The study highlights misalignments with international standards like the GDPR and HIPAA, particularly in AI governance and cross-border data flows. To address these issues, the study recommends: (1) strengthening operational standards by adopting WHO guidelines and mandating AI validation; (2) clarifying liability frameworks to define malpractice accountability; and (3) bridging the digital divide through subsidized internet and device programs.
Co-Authors Adianto Mau, Hedwig Afandi Sahidin, Ihtisab Amelia Syauket Candra, Mardi Mutiah, Fifi Ricky Thio