Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Wawasan : Jurnal Ilmiah Agama dan Sosial Budaya Ganaya: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Jurnal ICMES: The Journal of Middle East Studies Nusantara Science and Technology Proceedings
Ascha, Muchammad Chasif
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Materials Science & Nanotechnology Medicine & Pharmacology Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
The Security Dilemma and the Prevailing Trend of the Arms Race in the Middle East throughout 2020-2022 Wibowo, Prihandono; Hapsari, Renitha Dwi; Ascha, Muchammad Chasif
Ganaya : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Vol 6 No 4 (2023)
Publisher : Jayapangus Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37329/ganaya.v6i4.2746

Abstract

This research aims to find the causes of the arms race in the Middle East region from 2020 to 2022. The justification for the problem is that although from 2020 to 2022 there is a tendency for reconciliation of relations between countries in the Middle East, the arms race still continues in the region. In addition, military exercises conducted by the United States, Israel, and Gulf Arab states are getting more intense. This paper uses the conception of security dilemma in explaining the causes of the arms race trend in the Middle East region. The method used by this paper is qualitative by analyzing statements, news, and official documents from related Middle Eastern countries. This paper finds that mistrust between Middle Eastern countries, especially between Iran, Israel, and several Arab countries, causes tense relations between these actors. Each country increased its military power in response to the uncertain situation. Some Arab countries are strengthening their defense systems to counter Iran, which is perceived as a common threat. Iran is perceived by Israel and some Arab countries as an offensive country. Some Arab countries also normalized with Israel and formed strategic alliances with the Zionist state. In contrast, Iran continues to strengthen its military power because it has no trust in Israel and Arab countries. In conclusion, the conception of security dilemma can explain the distrust between actors in the Middle East region. As a result of this distrust, an arms race between countries occurs.
Pemikiran Geopolitik Islamic State of Irak and Syria (ISIS) Wibowo, Prihandono; Hapsari, Renitha Dwi; Ascha, Muchammad Chasif
Jurnal ICMES Vol 7 No 1 (2023): Jurnal ICMES: The Journal of Middle East Studies
Publisher : Indonesia Center for Middle East Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35748/jurnalicmes.v7i1.150

Abstract

Geopolitical studies developed significantly. While classical geopolitical studies focus on interactions between countries in controlling areas considered strategic, contemporary geopolitical studies open up studies on how non-state actors also embrace geopolitical thinking. Contemporary geopolitical studies include the use of geopolitical elements by terrorist groups. Regarding actual developments, ISIS is different from other terrorist groups. ISIS proclaimed itself as a caliphate, controled a large territory, and acted like a state. In the 2013-2017 era, before finally being defeated by the Iraqi and Syrian militaries and their coalitions, ISIS controlled strategic areas, including several cities in Iraq and Suriah. This study aims to understand the construction of geopolitical thinking developed by ISIS. The method uses in this study is a qualitative method by analyzing various documents published by ISIS
The Pentahelix Strategy for Addressing Radicalism and Terrorism Issue in Surabaya Wibowo, Prihandono; Hapsari, Renitha Dwi; Ascha, Muchammad Chasif
Nusantara Science and Technology Proceedings 8th International Seminar of Research Month 2023
Publisher : Future Science

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.11594/nstp.2024.4146

Abstract

Over the past few decades, Surabaya has maintained a reputation as a city with a high level of safety. The capital of East Java Province is devoid of any socio-political upheaval. During the 2000s, some major cities, including Jakarta and Bali, saw a wave of terrorism. However, it is noteworthy that the city under consideration, often called the "city of heroes," did not see comparable tragedies during this period. In the year 2018, Surabaya encountered a terrorist occurrence. The phenomena of radicalism and terrorism are intricate and multifaceted, necessitating the involvement of multiple stakeholders for their resolution. The Surabaya municipal government emphasizes fostering collaboration among various stakeholders to ensure stability. Nevertheless, the provincial capital of Jawa Timur continues to experience many occurrences, such as the recent surge in terrorist apprehensions in Surabaya and the prevailing existence of extremist factions. Evidence suggests the presence of radical movements within the city of Surabaya. The primary objective of this study is to examine the implementation of cross-sectoral collaboration in addressing issues related to radicalism and terrorism within the urban context of Surabaya. This research aims to provide valuable insights for the Surabaya city government and relevant stakeholders regarding the issue of radicalism and terrorism in Surabaya to inform policy decisions. Within the framework of radicalism and terrorism, it is vital to explore how cross-sector collaboration in the urban setting of Surabaya addresses this phenomenon. This study uses the Penthaelix cooperation framework to analyze the dynamics of collaboration among various stakeholders in Surabaya City in their efforts to combat radicalism and terrorism. The researchers successfully identified eight key informants representing each stakeholder cluster. Through conducting research and engaging in interviews, valuable insights were gathered regarding the patterns of cooperation that emerged and the problems encountered.
Navigating Challenges in the Penta Helix Model: Collaborative Strategies and Obstacles in Countering Extremism in Surabaya, Indonesia Wibowo, Prihandono; Hapsari, Renitha Dwi; Ascha, Muchammad Chasif; Widjaya, Salsa Febiola Gading; Octavia, Afissa Hanani
Wawasan: Jurnal Ilmiah Agama dan Sosial Budaya Vol 10 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : the Faculty of Ushuluddin, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/jw.v10i1.39307

Abstract

This study examines the challenges in implementing the Penta helix model to counter radicalism and terrorism in Surabaya, Indonesia. Given Surabaya's strategic importance and vulnerability to extremism, the research seeks to assess how collaboration among government, academia, media, civil society, and the private sector functions within this framework. Employing a descriptive-qualitative approach, data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders, including law enforcement, religious leaders, civil society, and media representatives, supplemented by document analysis. The findings indicate that while the Penta helix strategy has been partially operationalised, several challenges remain. These include minimal involvement of the business sector, fragmented stakeholder coordination, budgetary limitations, and a notable absence of gender mainstreaming despite the involvement of women in previous terrorist acts. These limitations reduce the model’s effectiveness in preventing and countering violent extremism. The study highlights the need to strengthen inter-sectoral collaboration by fully implementing the National Action Plan (RAN PE), institutionalising business sector contributions through CSR, and incorporating gender perspectives into local counter-terrorism policies. This research contributes to the discourse on collaborative governance in extremism prevention by offering a localised analysis of the Penta helix model. Its originality lies in identifying gender mainstreaming and private sector gaps as underexplored barriers, thereby extending existing knowledge on policy implementation at the municipal level.
Co-Authors Hapsari, Renitha Dwi Octavia, Afissa Hanani Prihandono Wibowo Widjaya, Salsa Febiola Gading