Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF JUSTICE IN NON-ADJUDICATIVE SETTLEMENT OF BANKING DISPUTES FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF ISLAMIC LAW Maskanah, Ummi; Md Nor, Mohd Zakhiri; Mulyana, Aji
Jurisdictie: Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah Vol 15, No 1 (2024): Jurisdictie
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/j.v15i1.25411

Abstract

Improving Indonesia's economy is crucial for overcoming poverty, especially post-Covid-19, which caused many business closures. The government introduced the People's Business Credit (KUR) programme to support MSMEs, though some programmes face bad debt issues. In West Bandung Regency, MSMEs use the programme extensively for economic recovery. This research examines whether the Non-Adjudication Settlement model between MSME actors and Islamic banks upholds principles of justice. Using normative and empirical juridical methods, the study incorporates primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, along with interviews with MSME actors and KUR-issuing banks. Dispute resolution for problem credits can occur through adjudication (court) or non-adjudication (out-of-court). Islamic banks integrate values from Islamic teachings, encompassing law, morality, and social procedures. For KUR bad credit disputes, Islamic banks are mandated to select processes aligning with Islamic values of truth, justice, and compassion. The non-litigation settlement model is found to reflect Islamic and Indonesian societal values, emphasizing deliberation for consensus and justice. The contribution of this research is to provide an understanding of the effectiveness of the non-adjudication settlement model in handling bad credit in the KUR program, aligning with Islamic values and reflecting Indonesian values. This model can serve as a fairer and more efficient dispute resolution alternative for MSMEs and Islamic banks in Indonesia. Meningkatkan ekonomi Indonesia menjadi sangat penting untuk mengatasi kemiskinan, terutama pasca-Covid-19 yang menyebabkan banyak bisnis tutup. Pemerintah memperkenalkan program Kredit Usaha Rakyat (KUR) untuk mendukung UMKM, meskipun beberapa program menghadapi masalah kredit macet. Di Kabupaten Bandung Barat, UMKM menggunakan program ini secara luas untuk pemulihan ekonomi. Penelitian ini mengkaji apakah model Penyelesaian Non-Adjudikasi antara pelaku UMKM dan bank syariah menjunjung prinsip-prinsip keadilan. Dengan menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dan empiris, studi ini melibatkan bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier, serta wawancara dengan pelaku UMKM dan bank penerbit KUR. Penyelesaian sengketa untuk kredit bermasalah dapat dilakukan melalui adjudikasi (pengadilan) atau non-adjudikasi (di luar pengadilan). Bank syariah mengintegrasikan nilai-nilai dari ajaran Islam, yang mencakup hukum, moralitas, dan prosedur sosial. Untuk sengketa kredit macet KUR, bank syariah diwajibkan memilih proses yang sesuai dengan nilai-nilai Islam tentang kebenaran, keadilan, dan kasih sayang. Model penyelesaian non-litigasi ditemukan mencerminkan nilai-nilai Islam dan nilai-nilai masyarakat Indonesia, menekankan musyawarah untuk mufakat dan prinsip keadilan. Kontribusi penelitian ini adalah memberikan pemahaman tentang efektivitas model penyelesaian non-adjudikasi dalam menangani kredit macet dalam program KUR, yang sesuai dengan nilai-nilai Islam dan mencerminkan nilai-nilai Indonesia. Model ini dapat menjadi alternatif penyelesaian sengketa yang lebih adil dan efisien bagi pelaku UMKM dan bank syariah di Indonesia.
Security in islamic finance shariah compliance and the new civil court's approach to dispute resolution Mohamad, Ani Munirah; Md Nor, Mohd Zakhiri; Rachmawati, Irma
International Journal of Latin Notary Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023): Internasional Journal of Latin Notary, September 2023
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61968/journal.v4i1.61

Abstract

Malaysia has a dual financial system that includes both conventional banking and Islamic banking. Over time, Islamic banking has evolved to the point where it has enticed traditional banks to offer Shariah-compliant products as well. However, even though conventional banks have provided Shariah-compliant products, the Islamic bank's obligation to provide Islamic banking services remains. The goal of this article is to look at the measures in the Islamic Financial Services Act 2013 that assure Shariah-compliance security for Islamic banks. This paper also investigates the current approach of civil courts in resolving disputes. The qualitative research methodology was used in this paper. The phenomenology method was used in the research design. Data will be gathered from journals, statutes, and case law. The data will be analyzed using the content analysis method. This paper concludes that it is a heavy-duty of every Islamic bank to ensure Shariah compliance security, and the current civil court approach is that the Islamic banking agreement is still enforceable even if it does not comply with Shariah law. Islamic banking agreements that are in accordance with Shariah law or are not perfectly in accordance with Shariah law are both valid and legal