Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Lumen Veritatis: Jurnal Filsafat dan Teologi International Journal of Linguistics and Discourse Analytics (ijolida) e-Journal of Linguistics
David Samuel Latupeirissa
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
DOCUMENTING LANGUAGES USING NATURAL SEMANTIC METALANGUAGE THEORY: A CASE STUDY OF ‘SEE’ AND ‘FALL’ IN KUPANG MALAY LANGUAGE David Samuel Latupeirissa
International Journal of Linguistics and Discourse Analytics Vol 1 No 2 (2020): IJOLIDA Vol.1 No.2, March 2020
Publisher : Denpasar Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (564.184 KB) | DOI: 10.52232/ijolida.v1i2.23

Abstract

There are some approaches that can be applied to documenting local languages. One of them is an approach of Natural Semantic Metalanguage (NSM) theory. This paper aims to present a case study of a local language documentation – in this case, lexicosemantic documentation - using NSM as a brief example of documenting local language. The lexicons presented in this paper are verbs ‘see’ and ‘fall’ in Kupang Malay Language (KML). KML itself is a local language in East Nusa Tenggara Province- Indonesia (Latupeirissa, 2016a). Scientifically, this language is a creole language (Jacob and Grimes, 2003) that formed by local languages migration and diaspora (Latupeirissa, 2016b, 2017). Research data has been collected by combining two methods, namely: Documentation Method and Linguistic Field Research Method. For Documentation Method, researchers gained data from (1) KML Bible, (2) KML dictionary, and (3) Tapaleuk Column in Pos Kupang Newspaper. For Linguistic Field Research Method, researchers gained data through daily conversation and interview. Next, the researchers use paraphrase/ explication technique to discuss the result. The result shows that lexicon ‘See’ has five different semantic meaning in KML. They are ‘lia’, ‘loti’, ‘malerok’, ‘maloi’ and ‘pe’e mata’, while lexicon ‘Fall’ has seven different semantic meaning in KML, namely ‘jato’, ‘rubu’, ‘malenggang’, ‘tikam mulu’, ‘tikam kapala’, ‘taroso’, ‘puku panta’.
AGAMA SEBAGAI ALIENASI MANUSIA (Refleksi Kritis Atas Kritik Agama Karl Marx) Patrisius Seran; David Samuel Latupeirissa
Lumen Veritatis: Jurnal Filsafat dan Teologi Vol 12 No 1 (2021): LUMEN VERITATIS : Jurnal Filsafat dan Teologi | Mei 2021 ~ Oktober 2021
Publisher : Program Studi Filsafat Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira Kupang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30822/lumenveritatis.v12i1.1305

Abstract

The research aims to inventory, critical evaluation, synthesis, and gain a new understanding of Karl Marx's religious criticism. This research is qualitative descriptive using literature study methods. The finding in this study is that marx actually continued feuerbach's religious criticism. According to Marx, Feuerbach's religious criticism was limited to religious criticism. Religious criticism should come down to the situations and conditions that give birth to religion. According to Marx, those who gave birth to religion were man, the human world, society, and the state. Therefore, religious criticism must reach its root, namely criticism of the social conditions of the people who gave birth to religion. Religion as human alienation because in reality human life is always oppressed by other groups of people who are more powerful. To free himself from this exile, Marx concluded that there needed to be a total revolution of oppressed society against the oppressor. The main purpose of this revolution is to free people, especially the oppressed from various alienation, especially social alienation. This, according to Marx, can be achieved by abolishing the system of private ownership of the means of production controlled by upper society. By removing the system of private ownership of the means of production, there will also be classes in society so that a society without classes arises. From this we know that the main purpose of Marx's religious criticism is not religion in se but rather in the concrete real situation of human social life oriented towards exploiting humans. From this we know that the main purpose of Marx's religious criticism is not religion in se but rather in the concrete real situation of human social life oriented towards exploiting humans. Religious criticism was a demonstration of Marx's mind concerned with the living conditions of the workers of his day. The ultimate goal of this criticism is human sociality. There is no more slavery of the workers by the capitalists. Marx wanted an equal life.
Lingual Investigation of President Soekarno Speech: A Report David Samuel Latupeirissa; I Ketut Darma Laksana; Ketut Artawa; I. G. Ag. Sosiowati
e-Journal of Linguistics Vol. 13 No. 2 (2019): July
Publisher : The Doctoral Studies Program of Linguistics of Udayana University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/e-jl.2019.v13.i02.p07

Abstract

The current research aims at investigating the most important speech of Soekarno andthe ideologies behind the speech. Since Soekarno was the proclaimer of Indonesianindependence as well as the first president of Indonesia, we would claim that his speeches wereimportant to be investigated. Among the speeches, we tried to reveal the most important onethrough a lingual investigation. This investigation was based on grounded theory andhermeneutic theory. It was focused on the text as a part of the language. The results have shownthat the most important speech of Soekarno is the speech entitled, ‘Tahun Berdikari’. It is viewedas a high novelty finding because there is no researcher who has ever claimed ‘Tahun Berdikari’as the most important speech in the history of Indonesia. The speech contained three mainideologies, namely (1) unity as the most important thing for Indonesians, (2) revolution must bein the Indonesian soul, and (3) imperialism and capitalism as Indonesia’s main enemy.
Co-Authors I Ketut Artawa I Ketut Darma Laksana I. G. Ag. Sosiowati Patrisius Seran