Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Mediasas : Media Ilmu Syari'ah dan Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah Hakamain: Journal of Sharia and Law Studies
Salsabila, Ulfa
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
The Dynamics of the 2024 Jakarta Gubernatorial Election: Political Competition, Electoral Challenges, and Democratic Prospects Salsabila, Ulfa; Fatimah, Siti; Alfarisi, Muhammad Adib
Jurnal Mediasas: Media Ilmu Syari'ah dan Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Mediasas: Media Ilmu Syariah dan Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Department, STAI Syekh Abdur Rauf Aceh Singkil, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58824/mediasas.v8i1.267

Abstract

This study examines the dynamics of the 2024 Jakarta Gubernatorial Election (Pilkada). The focus is on the complex competition between political parties and candidates, as well as the winning strategy of the candidate pair Pramono Anung and Rano Karno in the 2024 Jakarta Pilkada. Based on the dynamics and controversies surrounding the 2024 Jakarta Pilkada, this research aims to assess the prospects for democracy in the organization of the Jakarta Pilkada in general, based on the indicators of good electoral governance. This paper uses a normative legal research method with secondary data collection techniques through literature studies. The findings of this study show that the Jakarta Pilkada was conducted democratically as it implemented the indicators of good electoral governance. However, these indicators have not been fully implemented, such as the low participation of Jakarta residents in the 2024 Pilkada, the proper distribution of Form C6, and the misinformation spread by the General Election Commission (KPU) regarding the quick count survey results and the Sirekap system, which caused public confusion. This article is expected to provide in-depth insights for readers on the dynamics of the 2024 Jakarta Pilkada. Furthermore, this study is also intended to serve as an evaluation and reflection for stakeholders to improve the organization of future Pilkada that is more democratic and accountable. [Penelitian ini mengulas dinamika Pilkada Jakarta tahun 2024. Fokusnya adalah pada dinamika persaingan yang cukup kompleks antara partai politik dan pasangan calon, serta strategi kemenangan pasangan Pramono Anung dan Rano Karno pada Pilkada Jakarta tahun 2024. Berangkat dari dinamika dan polemik Pilkada Jakarta 2024, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji prospek demokrasi pada penyelenggaran Pilkada Jakarta secara umum berdasarkan indikator good electoral governance. Tulisan ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan teknik pengumpulan data sekunder melalui studi pustaka. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Pilkada Jakarta berlangsung secara demokratis karena telah mengimplementasikan indikator good electoral governance. Meskipun demikian, indikator-indikator tersebut belum terimplementasi dengan sempurna, seperti rendahnya partisipasi masyarakat Jakarta pada Pilkada Jakarta tahun 2024, formulir C6 yang terdistribusi dengan baik, serta disinformasi yang dilakukan oleh KPU terkait hasil survei quick count dan Sirekap yang menimbulkan kebingungan publik. Artikel ini diharapkan dapat memberikan wawasan mendalam bagi pembaca tentang dinamika Pilkada Jakarta tahun 2024. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga diharapkan dapat menjadi bahan evaluasi dan refleksi bagi para skateholders dalam meningkatkan penyelenggaraan Pilkada yang lebih demokratis dan akuntabel di masa depan].
Judicial System Digitalization: The Constitutionality of the E-Court System in Southeast Asia Ruzayana, Zumrotu; Salsabila, Ulfa; Nuzul Hidayah, Robiah; Firsha , Misbahul
Hakamain: Journal of Sharia and Law Studies Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): June 2025
Publisher : Yayasan Lembaga Studi Makwa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57255/hakamain.v4i1.1343

Abstract

This study aims to examine the constitutionality of the e-Court system as a form of judicial system digitalization in Indonesia and Malaysia. The research employs an empirical legal method by conducting in-depth interviews with judges, court staff, lawyers, and digital service users, as well as direct observations of e-Court implementation in selected judicial institutions across both countries. The primary objective is to understand how the digital transformation of court procedures aligns with constitutional principles such as access to justice, legal certainty, due process, and transparency. The findings indicate that in Indonesia, the e-Court system is largely viewed as constitutionally valid, rooted in the Supreme Court’s authority and the national commitment to judicial reform. However, issues such as uneven digital infrastructure, limited public access, and procedural challenges still persist. In Malaysia, the e-Court system is part of broader administrative reforms and has received significant institutional support, yet concerns remain regarding its compatibility with constitutional guarantees, especially in ensuring equal treatment and procedural fairness for all litigants. The study concludes that while both systems reflect progressive efforts to modernize the judiciary, their long-term legitimacy depends on how well they integrate constitutional values into digital innovations. The academic contribution of this research lies in providing an empirical and comparative perspective on how constitutional principles are interpreted and applied in the digitalization of judicial processes in Southeast Asia, thereby enriching the discourse on law and technology in developing constitutional democracies.
Co-Authors Alfarisi, Muhammad Adib Firsha , Misbahul Nuzul Hidayah, Robiah Ruzayana, Zumrotu Siti Fatimah