Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Legal Reformulation of Religious Court Divorce Decisions in Indonesia Due to Religious Conversion (Apostasy) Based on Unification and Principles of Islamic Law Formation Annas, Syaiful; Al-Amruzi, M. Fahmi; Muzainah, Gusti
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.6191

Abstract

Religious Courts as a manifestation of Islamic justice is reflected in its decisions that make Islamic law (fiqh) as a reference to its legal considerations. The difference in opinion of fiqh scholars regarding the application of divorce mechanisms due to the religious conversion of one of the parties, has implications for the birth of disparities in religious court decisions due to the absence of legal unification so as not to guarantee the realisation of justice, certainty and legal expediency in the decision. This research aims to explore and analyse the disparity in religious court decisions and to reformulate the law that is more appropriate in applying the divorce mechanism due to the religious conversion of one of the parties. This research is normative legal research, which is qualitative and uses a philosophical approach. The importance of legal unification so that there is no disparity in decisions will ensure the realisation of justice, certainty, and expediency, Moreover, religious court decisions as a manifestation of Islamic judicial decisions will become law for the community, therefore, it must also consider the principles in the formation of Islamic law
MASA PEMBAYARAN BEBAN NAFKAH IDDAH DAN MUT’AH DALAM PERKARA CERAI TALAK (Sebuah Implementasi Hukum Acara di Pengadilan Agama) Annas, Syaiful
Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol. 10 No. 1 (2017)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ahwal.2017.10101

Abstract

This paper will discuss the implementation of payment of  iddah and mut'ah in the divorce (raj’i). Judges often faced  a problem between text and context. Their decision imposes on men pays iddah and mut'ah life as a right for his ex-wife, but it was not implemented as the judge's decision, so that women tend to be disadvantaged ones, although the formal law can be prosecuted fiat execution, but it is not easy for a woman, sometimes the cost of iddah and mut'ah charge is not comparable with the cost of carrying out the execution, not to mention ex-husband who went (fuzzy) away unnoticed after divorce statement. Therefore the necessary of a legal breakthrough to provide legal certainty for the rights of womens through the judge's decision, with consideration argumentative primarily to determine a living payout time of iddah And mut'ah. In this paper will be described legal reasons in court as legal considerations which contains elements of juridical, sociological, philosophical in decision [Tulisan ini hendak mendiskusikan bagaimana pelaksanaan pembebanan pembayaran nafkah iddah dan mut’ah dalam perkara talak (raj'i). Seringkali hakim dihadapkan pada problematika antara teks dan konteks. Adanya putusan yang membebankan terhadap laki-laki membayar sejumlah nafkah iddah dan mut’ah sebagai hak bagi mantan istri, akan tetapi tidak dilaksanakan sebagaimana putusan hakim, sehingga perempuan cenderung dirugikan, meskipun secara yuridis-formil dapat dituntut fiat eksekusi, tetapi tidak mudah bagi pihak perempuan, karena kadang biaya pembebanan nafkah iddah dan mut’ah tidak sebanding dengan biaya melaksanakan eksekusi, belum lagi problem mantan suami yang pergi tanpa diketahui lagi keberadaannya setelah pengucapan ikrar talaknya. Oleh karena itu perlu terobosan hukum guna menjamin hak perempuan tersebut melalui putusan hakim dengan pertimbangan yang argumentatif terutama untuk menentukan masa pembayaran nafkah iddah dan mut’ah tersebut. Dalam tulisan ini akan diurai alasan hukum dalam putusan pengadilan sebagai bahan pertimbangan hukum yang memuat unsur yuridis, sosiologis, filosofis dalam putusan tersebut.]