Rufi'i
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Circuit Training: Model Latihan Untuk Menunjang Ketepatan Pukulan Backhand Bulutangkis Putra, Puja Perdana; Rufi'i; Cholid, Abd
Journal Sport Area Vol 5 No 1 (2020): Juni
Publisher : UIR Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25299/sportarea.2020.vol5(1).4634

Abstract

The objective of this research was to develop circuit training exercise model to increase the accuracy of backhand strokes for badminton athletes and trainers. This research was conducted by several stages which started from validation stage by instructional design expert and content expert, then designing questionnaire which was validated by content expert and sports psychology expert, testing stage to colleagues, athletes as group and wide group. This testing was carried out in Patriot Sidoarjo Badminton Federation. The instrument of this research was questionnaire from coaches’ response and athletes’ response. Those responses were analyzed by descriptive statistics. The finding shows that the results of validation from content expert and instructional design expert, testing to small group and wide group, and implementation testing were good category. It can be concluded that this model that is intended to increase backhand strokes in badminton is valid to adopted by badminton coaches.
ITEM ANALYSIS OF BUFFER SOLUTION MULTIPLE-CHOICE TEST Kiky Setiawan; Rufi'i; Sabariah
Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Vol. 11 No. 02 (2026): Volume 11 No. 02 Juni 2026 Press
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/jp.v11i02.47117

Abstract

This study evaluated the quality of an end-of-chapter multiple-choice test on buffer solution material by examining reliability, item difficulty, discrimination, and distractor effectiveness. A descriptive quantitative design based on classical test theory was used. The data consisted of responses from 35 students to 25 multiple-choice items and were analyzed using ANATES. The results showed a reliability coefficient of 0.72, indicating acceptable overall consistency. However, all items were categorized as very easy, with correct response rates ranging from 88.57% to 100%. Discrimination analysis showed that 17 items were poor, 5 were moderate, 2 were good, and 1 was very good. Distractor analysis also indicated that most incorrect options were non-functional because they were rarely or never selected. Only items 2, 7, and 23 were recommended for retention without revision, while most items required revision or removal. These findings indicate that total-score reliability alone is insufficient for judging assessment quality. Routine item analysis is therefore essential to strengthen the diagnostic usefulness of chemistry classroom assessment.