Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Indonesia (J-PeHI)
Noor, Ganis Vitayanty
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
THE IMPACT OF ACCEPTING NEW STUDENTS WITH THE ZONING SYSTEM ON THE RIGHT TO CHILDREN'S EDUCATION Noor, Ganis Vitayanty
Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Vol 4 No 2 (2020): JUNE
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (293.103 KB) | DOI: 10.35326/volkgeist.v4i2.579

Abstract

Education is a human right. Everyone has the right to receive educational rights without restrictions. Everyone has the right to get the education and level of education they will attend. The government has an education equalization plan with the issuance of the Minister of Education and Culture Regulation No. 14 of 2018. The Minister of Education and Culture mentioned above applies a zoning system. The Minister of Education and Culture does not rule out the possibility of impacts for prospective students who wish to continue their education. The problem is how the impact of the PPDB zoning system on education rights in Kajen Subdistrict, Pekalongan Regency. The approach method used is a sociological juridical approach method. PPDB has positive and negative impacts. According to researchers, PPDB is not in accordance with the right to education of children, due to restrictions, the gap in the quality of learning with the same level of difficulty of the National Examination and the same curriculum that applies nationally. Keywords: education rights, children, impact of zoning
PERSEPSI CYBERCOMMUNITY TERHADAP KASUS KIP-K SALAH SASARAN DI INDONESIA DITINJAU DARI MAZHAB FORMAL SOSIOLOGI HUKUM Ahmad, Ridho Sa’dillah; Noor, Ganis Vitayanty; Wijayanti, Siti Nur
JPeHI (Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Indonesia) Vol 5, No 01 (2024): Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Indonesia (JPeHI)
Publisher : Universitas Darul Ulum Islamic Centre Sudirman GUPPI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61689/jpehi.v5i01.579

Abstract

ABSTRAKKIP-K merupakan penanda penerima Program Indonesia Pintar yang diperuntukan bagi mahasiswa yang kurang mampu sesuai dengan Undang-Undang No 10 Tahun 2020 tentang Program Indonesia Pintar. Peminat yang dari tahun ke tahun semakin meningkat dan salah satu Universitas yang menjembatani program ini adalah Universitas Diponegoro. Namun, beberapa bulan terakhir terdapat unggahan yang menggemparkan dunia maya sehingga memunculkan cybercommumity dalam kasus ini. Kasus yang dimaksud adalah penyalahgunaan program KIP-K yang harusnya untuk mahasiswa yang kurang mampu namun pada lapangannya diterima oleh mahasiswa dalam kategori mampu yang dari itu dianggap oleh cybercommunity sebagai tindakan untuk hodonisme. Penyalahgunaan tersebut memunculkan suatu rumusan masalah dari model Undang-Undang yang dipakai, kuota disetiap tahunnya dari Kemendikbudristek maupun Universitas Diponegoro, dan pendekatan mazhab formal yang dipakai dalam kasus KIP-K salah sasaran tersebut dari reaksi cybercommunity. Penelitian ini juga menggunakan metode kualitatif karena bersumber dari beberapa data serta dokumen maupun buku yang menjadi landasannya. Selain itu, jenis yang digunakan dalam metode penelitian ini deskriptif kualitatif yakni menjabarkan sesuatu penelitian dari sunver yang dilakukan secara kualitatif atau dari data-data yang ada.Kata Kunci: KIP-K, Indonesia, Cybercommunity, Mazhab Formal
Itsbat Marriage For Parents Who Die And The Legal Consequences: (Case Study: Ruling Of The Kajen Religious Court Number: 1059/Pdt.G/2022/ Pa Kjn) Noor, Ganis Vitayanty
Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): JUNE
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35326/volkgeist.v8i2.5452

Abstract

A marriage is valid if it is carried out according to religion/belief and is registered, for those who are Muslim it is recorded at the Religious Affairs Office (KUA) while for non-Muslims it is recorded at the Civil Registration Office (Capil). Marriage registration as proof that the marriage has been carried out. If a person cannot prove their marriage, then the husband and wife concerned must submit a request for itsbat marriage to the Religious Court. Legal marriage also has legal consequences for the rights of the wife and children. So what about those whose parents' marriage dies? And what are the legal consequences of the application for itsbat marriage? In this research, the author uses empirical juridical research methods, with the object of research being the decision of the Kajen religious court number: 1059 Pdt.G/2022/PA Kjn and interviews with related parties. For marriages where the parents have passed away, you can still apply for a marriage itsbat to the Religious Court. Applying for a marriage certificate for parents who have died is a contentious matter. Not all applications for marriage itsbat applications will be granted, but it could be in the form of a lawsuit decision to be withdrawn, a decision to be dismissed, a verstek decision, a decision not to be accepted, and a decision to be rejected. The legal consequence of the decision being granted is that the Petitioner/Petitioners can apply for registration of the marriage of their deceased parents to the Religious Affairs Office (KUA) which is the jurisdiction of the Religious Court which examines, hears and decides the case; The applicant/petitioners can make a birth certificate stating the name of their biological father; The Applicant/Applicants have a civil relationship with their biological father and their biological father's family; The Petitioner/Petitioners have the right to their biological father's assets if their biological father dies. Meanwhile, for court decisions other than those that are granted, you do not have rights similar to the rights obtained for decisions that are granted.
Co-Authors Ahmad, Ridho Sa’dillah Wijayanti, Siti Nur