Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

PENGGUNAAN HAK ANGKET DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT TERHADAP KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI Rahman, Muhammad Ali
Jurist-Diction Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018): Volume 01 No 1, September 2018
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/jd.v1i1.9746

Abstract

Munculnya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 36/PUU-XV/2017 merupakan dasar yang kuat bagi DPR untuk menggunakan hak angket terhadap KPK. Dalam Putusan tersebut Mahkamah Konstitusi berpendapat bahwa KPK merupakan bagian dari eksekutif, sehingga menjadikan KPK layak menjadi subyek hak angket DPR. Terkait dengan alasan tersebut, sebagian pihak termasuk KPK tidak sependapat. Berdasarkan hal tersebut, maka penulisan artikel ini ditujukan untuk menganalisis mengenai ratio decidendi dari Mahkamah Konstitusi, yang dalam hal ini pada ternyata ada kekeliruan hakim dalam pertimbangannya, di antaranya adalah adanya kesalahan menafsirkan kosiderans, dan tidak mempertimbangkan konsep lembaga negara independen yang berkembang pada konteks negara modern. Selain itu ada inkonsistensi baik dalam pendapatnya sendiri, maupun bila dibandingkan dengan Putusan MK Nomor 012-016-019 PUU-IV/2006, yang intinya bahwa KPK adalah lembaga yang bukan bagian dari kekuasaan eksekutif, legislatif, maupun yudikatif, tetapi merupakan lembaga independen.
Analysis of Language Errors in Indonesian Expository Essays by Junior High School Students Rahman, Muhammad Ali; Sulistyono, Yunus
Proceeding ISETH (International Summit on Science, Technology, and Humanity) 2024: Proceeding ISETH (International Summit on Science, Technology, and Humanity)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Purpose: This research aims to identify and describe forms of language errors in the areas of phonology, morphology and syntax in the expository text essays of students at SMP N 4 Karanganom. Methodology: The method used in this research is descriptive qualitative. The data in this research are expository text essays from class VIII A students of SMP N 4 Karanganom. Data collection techniques include observation and documentation by collecting expository text essays from class VIII A students of SMP N 4 Karanganom. The data analysis technique in this research uses tapping techniques and advanced free-to-engage listening techniques. Results: Based on the results of the analysis, errors were found at the phonological level, such as errors in the use of capital letters, errors in the use of punctuation marks, and errors in combining words. At the morphological level, errors were found in using the suffix -an, writing the prefix me-, writing the prefix ber-, writing a combination of the prefix di- with the suffix -kan, and errors in writing prepositions. Meanwhile, at the syntactic level, errors were found in unclear sentences and the use of redundant words. Applications/Originality/Value: The findings of this research can be used as a reference for teachers to design more effective language learning activities that focus on minimizing phonological, morphological, and syntactic errors in students’ writing.
Decision Making in Choosing Independent Auditors for Conducting Initial Audit Using Analysis Hierarchy Process for one of the Exporter Company in Australia Rahman, Muhammad Ali; Siallagan, Manahan
International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 5 No. 9 (2025): International Journal of Social Service and Research
Publisher : Ridwan Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/ijssr.v5i9.1306

Abstract

The Australian live cattle export industry to Indonesia operates under a stringent regulatory framework, the Exporter Supply Chain Assurance System (ESCAS), which mandates Independent Initial Audit Reports (IIAR) for new facilities. A critical challenge for exporters is the selection of a competent independent auditor, a decision often made informally, leading to risks of audit failure, cost overruns, and shipment delays. This study addresses this gap by applying the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to develop a structured, multi-criteria decision-making model for auditor selection.The research identified four key selection criteria through expert interviews: Flexibility in Time, Credibility, Cost per Facility, and Experience in the Field. Pairwise comparisons by industry experts determined the priority weights, revealing Flexibility in Time as the most critical factor (55.8%), followed by Credibility (26.3%). Three auditor firms were evaluated against these criteria. The AHP analysis calculated global priority scores, ranking Auditor A first (38.4%) due to its exceptional flexibility, which is paramount for mitigating supply chain disruption risks. Auditor B ranked second (35.9%), valued for its strong credibility, while Auditor C (25.7%) was deemed unsuitable despite its low cost due to inflexibility.The study concludes that a structured AHP model effectively transforms a subjective decision into a transparent, defensible process. The findings recommend selecting Auditor A, prioritizing operational resilience and regulatory security over short-term cost savings. This approach provides exporters with a robust framework to ensure compliance, protect market access, and enhance strategic decision-making in a high-stakes industry.