Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Science and Society (IJSOC) Akademika : Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Indonesian Journal of Interdisciplinary Islamic Studies (IJIIS) Madania: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman
Purwanto, Muhammad Roy
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Materials Science & Nanotechnology Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
THOUGHT OF NUSANTARA MOSLEM SCHOLARS: FIQH CONCEPTS OF SYEIKHARSYAD AL-BANJARI IN SABILALMUHTADIN Purwanto, Muhammad Roy
AKADEMIKA: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Vol 24 No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In the current context, the fiqh concepts of ulama nusantara(Nusantara Moslem Scholars) are important to be discussed as it has local wisdoms, progressivity, and adaptability in giving solutions to the society’s problems. This paper will discuss the fiqh concepts ofSyeikhArsyad al-Banjari in his book entitled SabilalMuhtadin that discusses fiqh(Islamic jurisprudence) in the perspective of Nusantara’s society, especially Banjarese society. This paper uses normative-sociological approach in analyzing the fiqh concepts of SyeikhArsyad al-Banjari, such as, zakat receivers, floating lavatory, corpse burial in coffin (tabala), and providing food for mourners. The results of the study indicate that al-Banjariwas mainly relied on “custom is law” (al-adatumuhakkamah) and “generating benefits or mashlahah and declining damage” (jalb al-mashalihwadar’ al-mafasid) in his ijtihad (independent reasoning). He also believed that law evolved according to the society’s situation and condition (taghayyur al-ahkamyata’allaqu bi taghayyur al-azminahwa al-amkinah). All of al-Banjari’s concepts are in-line with Syafi’iyyah school. Keywords: Ijtihad, Fiqh, Nusantara, and Sabilal Muhtadin
Application Impact of Imam al-Shȃfi’i’s Qiyas on the Development of Islamic Legal Thought Purwanto, Muhammad Roy; Marazi, Hamidullah; Nafid, Ahmad Arun
Madania: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman Vol 28, No 1 (2024): JUNE
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/madania.v28i1.4219

Abstract

In the realm of methodology of Islamic jurisprudence (ushul al-fiqh), qiyas, a method of deriving Islamic law, holds a prominent position. It entails analogizing a legal ruling from a situation devoid of explicit textual guidance (nash) to a situation with established textual guidance, based on the shared underlying cause (illat). This is a descriptive research with a philosophical approach. The type of research used is library research with primary data referring to the original source, namely the book of logic by Aristotle. While secondary data is taken from works containing Aristotelian logic. This study found that Imam al-Shâfi’i stands as the pioneer in formulating qiyas as a method of ijtihad (legal reasoning). His rigorous formulation of qiyas drew theoretical underpinnings from Aristotelian logic. The incorporation of Aristotelian logic into qiyas imbued the method with a strict and contrapositive nature, adhering to the principles of syllogistic logic. In syllogistic reasoning, the conclusion invariably follows from the major premise, which in qiyas is derived from the sacred text (the Quran). To overcome this intellectual stagnation, a burhani methodology, as championed by Ibn Rushd, Ibn Khaldun, Ibn Hazm, and al-Shâtibi, emerged. This methodology successfully established a liberal rational epistemology grounded in the spirit of burhani logic and contextualized Quranic interpretation. Dalam ranah metodologi yurisprudensi Islam (ushul fiqh), qiyas, sebuah metode untuk memperoleh hukum Islam, memegang posisi yang menonjol. Metode ini melibatkan analogisasi putusan hukum dari situasi yang tidak memiliki petunjuk tekstual yang jelas (nash) ke situasi dengan petunjuk tekstual yang mapan, berdasarkan penyebab dasar yang sama (illat). Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif dengan pendekatan filosofis. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian kepustakaan dengan data primer mengacu pada sumber asli yaitu kitab logika karya Aristoteles. Sedangkan data sekunder diambil dari karya-karya yang mengandung logika Aristotelian. Studi ini menemukan bahwa Imam al-Shâfi'i berdiri sebagai pelopor dalam merumuskan qiyas sebagai metode ijtihad (penalaran hukum). Perumusannya yang ketat tentang qiyas mengambil dasar-dasar teoritis dari logika Aristoteles. Penggabungan logika Aristoteles ke dalam qiyas mengilhami metode tersebut dengan sifat yang ketat dan kontrapositif, yang mematuhi prinsip-prinsip logika silogistik. Dalam penalaran silogistik, kesimpulan selalu mengikuti premis utama, yang dalam qiyas berasal dari teks suci (Alquran). Untuk mengatasi stagnasi intelektual ini, muncullah sebuah metodologi burhani, sebagaimana yang dipelopori oleh Ibnu Rushd, Ibnu Khaldun, Ibnu Hazm, dan al-Shatibi. Metodologi ini berhasil membangun epistemologi rasional liberal yang berlandaskan pada semangat logika burhani dan penafsiran Alquran yang kontekstual.
Digital Families and the Threat of Online Gambling: Legal Challenges in Protecting Children in Indonesia Muzacky, Ahmad; Purwanto, Muhammad Roy
International Journal of Science and Society Vol 7 No 2 (2025): International Journal of Science and Society (IJSOC)
Publisher : GoAcademica Research & Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54783/ijsoc.v7i2.1470

Abstract

Online gambling has created new forms of rifts in the family structure that occur silently but have a wide impact, especially on children. The fragmentation of relationships in digital households disrupts parenting functions and creates vulnerable psychosocial conditions for children in the domestic environment. Unfortunately, the child protection system in Indonesia lacks a mechanism to respond to indirect threats arising from the dynamics of cyberspace within the family. This study aims to critically examine the limitations of the legal and social systems in protecting children from family disintegration due to online gambling. The study employed a qualitative approach, drawing on library research and the analysis of relevant literature and secondary data. Data were analyzed using a thematic approach to uncover regulatory and social gaps that have not been able to anticipate structural damage in digital families. The results of the study show that existing regulations are still partial, and sectoral, and fail to touch on the complexity of families exposed to destructive digital practices. Child protection has not integrated new risk indicators that arise from uncontrolled online environments. A redesign of the child protection system is needed to be more inclusive, multisectoral, and adaptive to the challenges of digital families so that the best interests of children can be guaranteed comprehensively.
Critical Analysis of Orientalist Understanding of Polygamy Sharia Alfian, Muhammad; Purwanto, Muhammad Roy
International Journal of Science and Society Vol 6 No 2 (2024): International Journal of Science and Society (IJSOC)
Publisher : GoAcademica Research & Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54783/ijsoc.v6i2.1177

Abstract

Polygamy is a term that contains various meanings, often exciting men's imaginations as an ideal while triggering deep emotions in women. Many women, naturally jealous and reluctant to share their husband's love, oppose polygamy. Despite this, some extraordinary women accept it patiently. On one side, critics link polygamy to gender inequality and discrimination against women, while supporters believe it can reduce infidelity and prostitution. Misconceptions about polygamy, often fueled by anti-Islamic sentiment, have influenced Muslim society, leading some to view it negatively and others to defend it as a part of Islamic perfection. This research then aims to find out how orientalists criticize polygamy law and refute orientalist understanding of polygamy law. This research method will be carried out using a qualitative approach. The data used in this research comes from the results of a literature study of previous literature and research that is still relevant. The results of this research then found that the polygamy law in Islam has a strong historical basis, aiming to protect and regulate the practice of polygamy with the principles of justice and responsibility. Islam sets strict limits and conditions to ensure that polygamy is not abused and that women's rights are protected. Misinterpretations by Orientalists often ignore this context and spread biased views regarding polygamy law. Despite challenges and criticism of the practice of polygamy, education and fair enforcement of the law can provide significant social and individual benefits.
Layered Customary Legitimacy of Same-Clan Marriage Prohibition: A Systems-Based Maqasid Al-Shariah Study in Parit Baru, Indonesia Akmal, Khairul; Purwanto, Muhammad Roy; Nasution, Khoiruddin
Indonesian Journal of Interdisciplinary Islamic Studies (IJIIS) Vol. 9, No. 1, June 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/ijiis.vol9.iss1.art2

Abstract

Same-clan marriage remains prohibited under the customary law of Parit Baru Village, Kampar Regency, where it is associated with matrilineal kinship, genealogical clarity, inherited property, interclan relations, and ritual order. This study examines why the Ninik Mamak (customary elders in Kampar) continue to maintain the prohibition and evaluates its legitimacy through Jasser Auda’s systems-based Maqasid al-Shariah. The study employed a descriptive qualitative design combining historical, normative, and sociological approaches. Data were obtained through observation, documentation, and in-depth interviews with four Ninik Mamak representing the Melayu, Piliang, Domo, and Pitopang clans, then analyzed through data condensation, thematic presentation, and verification. The findings show that the prohibition operates through early verification of clan affiliation, customary marriage recommendations, control over ceremonial participation, and social sanctions. Although shared clan membership is not an independent impediment to marriage under Islamic law, it may prevent customary recognition and restrict participation in communal life. Enforcement has shifted from severe historical sanctions, such as expulsion and livestock fines, toward procedural restrictions, social exclusion, and loss of customary standing. Applying Auda’s six systems features, this study reveals that the legitimacy of customary objectives must be distinguished from the legitimacy of decision-making procedures, institutional authority, and sanctions. Protecting kinship continuity and communal cooperation may serve defensible purposes, but exclusion, inherited stigma, and interference with legal services can generate disproportionate harm. The study proposes a layered model of customary legitimacy and supports a transition toward consultation, mediation, proportionate responses, and social reintegration.
Co-Authors Khairul Akmal, Khairul Khoiruddin Nasution Marazi, Hamidullah Muhammad Alfian, Muhammad Muzacky, Ahmad Nafid, Ahmad Arun