Khabibullah, Muttaqin
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Tahapan dan Langkah-Langkah Penerapan Mixed Method Research (MMR) dalam Penelitian Pendidikan Khabibullah, Muttaqin; Alimin; Sholahuddin, Gus Malik Imam
Jurnal Studi Multidisiplin Qomaruna Vol 2 No 1 (2024): 2024
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (LPPM), Universitas Qomaruddin, Gresik, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62048/qjms.v2i1.55

Abstract

Many academics believe that using questionnaires and interviews simultaneously, or combining statistical analysis and narrative interpretation, can be categorized as mixed method research (MMR). This view is not entirely correct, but it is not entirely wrong either. MMR involves integrating quantitative and qualitative methods in a study, including all related components. However, not all simultaneous uses of quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis techniques can be considered MMR, as several key factors, such as timing, weighting, and research objectives, must be taken into account. This article aims to elaborate on various MMR models and their implementation steps, using a literature review method. The study identifies six MMR models: Sequential Explanatory, Sequential Exploratory, Concurrent Triangulation, Concurrent Embedded, Sequential Transformative, and Concurrent Transformative. However, the last two models are not discussed in detail due to their lower popularity. The Sequential Explanatory model integrates quantitative and qualitative methods sequentially, with greater emphasis on quantitative methods to provide additional information. Similarly, the Sequential Exploratory model is conducted sequentially but places more weight on qualitative data to connect findings. The Concurrent Triangulation model integrates both methods simultaneously, with equal weighting to compare data, while the Concurrent Embedded model combines the methods simultaneously but prioritizes one as the primary method and the other as the secondary method, aiming to compare data. Our findings provide practical guidelines for researchers in implementing each MMR model, particularly by highlighting aspects that are often overlooked in previous literature. These guidelines are expected to help researchers select and apply models that align with their research needs.
Melampaui Paradigm Wars: Pragmatisme sebagai Meta-Framework untuk Integrasi Tradisi Filosofis dalam Mixed Method Research Khabibullah, Muttaqin; Alimin; Sholahuddin, Gus Malik Imam
Jurnal Studi Multidisiplin Qomaruna Vol 2 No 2 (2025): 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (LPPM), Universitas Qomaruddin, Gresik, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62048/qjms.v2i2.81

Abstract

In recent decades, MMR has emerged as the third methodological movement due to the “paradigm wars” between quantitsative and qualitative. The philosophy of pragmatism is often associated with MMR because of its flexibility in integrating various methods to answer research needs. However, there are still major challenges in integrating the underlying philosophies, especially the aspects of ontology, epistemology, and methodology. This study aims to analyze how the philosophy of pragmatism can be used as a meta-framework in MMR; how pragmatism is able to accommodate positivism, constructivism, critical realism, and transformative-emancipatory in various MMR models; and to develop a conceptual framework to understand the ontological, epistemological, and methodological positions of this integration. The approach used in this study is literature synthesis with the narrative review method. This study produces findings that pragmatism in MMR acts as a meta-framework that can combine various research methods by accommodating various relevant philosophical views. The results of this study also found that pragmatism is able to accommodate various philosophical paradigms by accepting that both quantitative and qualitative (as well as other methods) have equal value and complement each other in producing scientific knowledge. Furthermore, the results of this study also present a conceptual framework that can position ontology, epistemology, and methodology in MMR integration.
Genealogy, Symbolic Capital, and Power Reproduction in the Bani Qomaruddin Pesantren Community Wajdi, Ahmad Farid; Khabibullah, Muttaqin
Jurnal Sosiologi Reflektif Vol. 20 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/13mn9259

Abstract

Genealogical documentation has long been a central tradition in Javanese pesantren communities, serving not only to trace lineage but also to preserve spiritual authority and cultural continuity. In Bani Qomaruddin, genealogy plays a significant role in shaping social relations, moral legitimacy, and institutional leadership. This research aims to examine how genealogical practice is capitalized as symbolic capital in socio-religious, economic, and political domains. Using a qualitative case study approach, data were collected through in-depth interviews with key figures across sub-lineages, selected via purposive and snowball sampling. The data were analyzed using Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña’s interactive model, with Bourdieu’s theory of capital and field serving as the theoretical framework. Findings show that genealogy in Bani Qomaruddin operates as a dynamic field where various forms of capital—social, symbolic, economic, and political—are produced, converted, and contested. It also reveals that genealogical legitimacy functions as both a spiritual ethos and a mechanism for structuring authority and resource distribution. The implication of this study is that genealogical practice serves as a key instrument in the reproduction of power, solidarity, and identity within Indonesian Muslim society. Tradisi pencatatan silsilah telah lama menjadi bagian penting dalam masyarakat pesantren Jawa, tidak hanya untuk melacak garis keturunan, tetapi juga menjaga otoritas spiritual dan kesinambungan budaya. Di komunitas Bani Qomaruddin, praktik genealogis berperan besar dalam membentuk hubungan sosial, legitimasi moral, dan kepemimpinan kelembagaan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji bagaimana praktik genealogis dikapitalisasi sebagai modal simbolik dalam ranah sosial-religius, ekonomi, dan politik. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif studi kasus, dengan teknik pengumpulan data melalui wawancara mendalam terhadap tokoh-tokoh kunci yang dipilih dengan teknik purposive dan snowball sampling. Data dianalisis dengan model interaktif Miles, Huberman, dan Saldaña, dan menggunakan teori modal dan ranah dari Pierre Bourdieu sebagai kerangka teoritik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa genealogis di Bani Qomaruddin merupakan arena dinamis tempat berbagai bentuk modal diproduksi, dikonversi, dan diperebutkan. Legitimasi genealogis juga berfungsi sebagai etos spiritual sekaligus mekanisme dalam pengelolaan otoritas dan distribusi sumber daya. Implikasi dari penelitian ini adalah bahwa praktik genealogis menjadi instrumen penting dalam reproduksi kekuasaan, solidaritas, dan identitas dalam masyarakat Muslim Indonesia.