Pintary, Marsha Rayfa
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Giant Intracranial Aneurysm Presenting as Temporal Hemianopia: When the Eyes Reveal a Hidden Danger Pertiwi, Annisa Nindiana; Nusanti, Syntia; Pintary, Marsha Rayfa; Dewiputri, Salmarezka; Ayuningtyas, Sita Paramita; Sidik, Muhammad
Majalah Oftalmologi Indonesia Vol 51 No 2 (2025): Ophthalmologica Indonesiana
Publisher : The Indonesian Ophthalmologists Association (IOA, Perhimpunan Dokter Spesialis Mata Indonesia (Perdami))

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35749/journal.v51i2.101687

Abstract

Introduction: Giant intracranial aneurysms (GIA) are rare and deadly diseases due to the high risk of rupture. The purpose of this report is to describe a case of GIA presenting as temporal hemianopia. Case Report: A 52-year-old male presented with worsening blurry vision three weeks before admission. Visual acuity was light perception in the right eye and 6/18 in the left eye. Neuro-ophthalmic examination revealed a relative afferent pupillary defect in the right eye and bilateral optic atrophy. At the next visit, the visual acuity of the right eye recovered to 6/18. Visual field testing showed temporal hemianopia in the left eye and generalized depression in the right eye. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a 0,4 cm x 2,5 cm x 1,9 cm saccular aneurysm, on the medial side of the left internal carotid artery (ICA). Discussion: A giant (diameter ≥2.5 cm) ICA aneurysm may compress the optic chiasm, leading to various stages of visual loss. Several factors are known to delicate balance between thrombogenesis and thrombolysis within the aneurysmal sac. Spontaneous intra-saccular thrombosis in an unruptured GIA may be induced by calcification within the atherosclerotic wall of the aneurysm and loss of elastic lamina. It is prone to occur in a narrow aneurysm neck (<0.4 cm). Thrombosis reduces the size of the aneurysm sac, in which the accumulated fluid is reabsorbed. This may explain the decompression effect on optic chiasm and spontaneous visual recovery.   Conclusion: Intracranial aneurysms are a rare cause of optic chiasm compression but can still be considered in cases of temporal hemianopia.
 AN ATYPICAL CASE OF BILATERAL CORNEAL OPACITY: WHAT ARE THE POSSIBLE DIAGNOSIS? Zarwan, Jessica; Siregar, Astrid Mariam Khairani; Pintary, Marsha Rayfa; Widyawati, Syska; Martha, Faraby; Rhendy, Rio
Majalah Oftalmologi Indonesia Vol 50 No 1 (2024): Ophthalmologica Indonesiana
Publisher : The Indonesian Ophthalmologists Association (IOA, Perhimpunan Dokter Spesialis Mata Indonesia (Perdami))

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35749/c1s1j485

Abstract

Introduction: Corneal opacity can be divided into inflammatory and noninflammatory entities. The clinical presentation and characteristics of a corneal opacity can often help reach a diagnosis. However, atypical cases are more challenging to diagnose. This report aims to explore an atypical case of corneal opacity and the diagnostic approach through its clinical presentation. Case Report: A thirty-seven-year-old female patient had a chief complaint of gradual blurry vision in both eyes and slowly growing whitish lesions one year prior. The patient recalled a history of bilateral eye redness two years ago. The anterior segment examination and AS-OCT revealed bilateral, smooth, oedematous pearly-white elevated opacity with well-demarcated margins at the center of the cornea, with epithelial depth. The diagnosis of corneal keloid was favored, with GDLD and SND as the differential diagnosis. In local anesthesia, the patient underwent superficial keratectomy and amniotic membrane transplantation of the right eye. On one month follow-up, the patient felt an improvement in her subjective complaints with a normal appearance of the cornea. Discussion: The atypical characteristics found in our case didn’t fit a single mold, as it shared features of post- injury hypertrophic scar, degenerative, and dystrophy. We diagnosed the patient with corneal keloid caused by suspicion of subclinical infection. Although GDLD and SND were still possible, the working diagnosis was enough to warrant a therapeutic surgical removal. Conclusion: Atypical presentations make diagnosis more challenging. However, despite improvements in diagnostic modalities, signs, and symptoms remain very helpful in reaching a working diagnosis.