Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Lentera Hukum Unes Law Review
AN, Dodik Prihatin
Unknown Affiliation
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Putusan Bebas dalam Tindak Pidana Pencabulan Lestari, Ella Wahyu; Iriyanto, Echwan; AN, Dodik Prihatin
Lentera Hukum Vol 3 No 1 (2016): LENTERA HUKUM
Publisher : University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v3i1.5646

Abstract

Obscene crime is the immoral act that has attack the physical and psychic of the victims continuously, especially if the victims are minors, so it is required to be appropriate law enforcement. Obscene against children is a case that has difficult proofs, so it is can not be judged only by manifestations without based on the beliefs of judges and related theories. This article contains 2 (two) issues, namely: (1) Is the singular indictment formulated by the public prosecutor in verdict number: 52/Pid.B/2014/PN.Lok under the defendant's conduct? (2) Is the judge's consideration who was declared that the defendant is not guilty doing the obscene crime in verdict number: 52/Pid.B/2014/PN.Lwk under the facts revealed in the court.This paper uses a normative juridical research, by statute approach (statute approach) and conceptual approach (conceptual approach). Obtained conclusions that (1) the singular indictment formulated by the public prosecutor in verdict number: 52/Pid.B/2014/PN.Lwk is under the defendant's conduct (2) the judge consideration who was declared that the defendant is not guilty doing the obscene crime in verdict number: 52/Pid.B/2014/PN.Lwk is not following the facts revealed in the court. KEYWORDS: Obscene, Acquital, Indictmen, Judge Consideration.
Menilai Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Memutuskan Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Cahya, Lela Tyas Eka Prihatining; Nurhayati, Dwi Endah; AN, Dodik Prihatin
Lentera Hukum Vol 4 No 1 (2017): LENTERA HUKUM
Publisher : University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v4i1.4494

Abstract

This writing examines the consideration of judge to the decision concerning violence case according to Article 170 KUHP (Criminal Code) and evaluates conformity of decision with the provision of Article 197 Paragraph (1) KUHAP (Criminal Procedure Code) in the case of violence happened in Mojokerto. It takes into account of the judge to decide consideration which has the consequence of a decision made by the judge void by law. It uses statute and conceptual approaches analyzed through Article 170 KUHP and Article 197 Paragraph (1) KUHAP linked to the doctrine of experts to corroborate argument from the authors. In conclusion, this research considers the statement of the judge that the defendant guilty of a criminal offense according to Article 170 Paragraph 1 KUHP does not conform with the fact in the court wherein the court it is obtained the explanation from the witness that the letter of Visum et Repertum and a statement of the defendant done are exercised by the defendants caused casualties sustained. In addition, in making decision, the judge does not refer to Article 197 Paragraph (1) letter d and h so in which the decision should be declared void by law. Keywords: Consideration of Judge, Criminal Offense, Violence
Penyidikan oleh Kejaksaan Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi yang Dilakukan Aparat Penegak Hukum Ilmi, Ainus Sofa; Nurhayati, Dwi Endah; Halif, Halif; Iriyanto, Echwan; AN, Dodik Prihatin
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.887

Abstract

Based on Article 11 paragraph 1 of the Corruption Eradication Commission Law, the investigation process for criminal acts of corruption falls under the authority of the KPK. However, most of these investigations are carried out by the police or prosecutors. So whether prosecutor investigators have the authority to investigate corruption crimes against law enforcement officials is reviewed based on the Prosecutor's Law in conjunction with the Corruption Eradication Commission Law. As well as what are the legal consequences of investigations conducted by prosecutor investigators against law enforcement officials who commit acts of corruption in terms of the Corruption Eradication Commission Law. The results of this study can be concluded first, that the prosecutor's office has the authority to investigate criminal acts of corruption committed by law enforcement officials. However, based on the principle of lex specialis derogat legi generalis, it is the KPK that is in charge. Second, based on the provisions of the KPK Law, the KPK can take over the investigation process. This takeover attempt was not carried out by the KPK so that the KPK violated the code of ethics because it did not carry out its duties and authorities properly.
Co-Authors Cahya, Lela Tyas Eka Prihatining Echwan Iriyanto Halif, Halif Ilmi, Ainus Sofa Lestari, Ella Wahyu Nurhayati, Dwi Endah