Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 9 Documents
Search

Menjamak Sholat Bagi Pengantin yang Melaksanakan Walimah Al ’Urs Perspektif Syekh Alwi Ahmad Saqqaf dan Imam Asy-Syaukani Mayunda, Usdha Lifa; Marpaung, Aripin
AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Vol 4 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah INSURI Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almanhaj.v4i2.2023

Abstract

In the current era of progress, the wedding party (walimah al 'urs) is considered by some people as something that must be fulfilled when someone is married. Its raelitas can be seen when there is a wedding party (walimah al 'urs), some of the bride and groom will leave the prayer, some of them do their obligations after the prayer time is over and some of them choose plural. In this case the author takes the strongest opinion after munaqasyah al-adillah, namely the opinion of Sheikh Alwi Ahmad Saqqaf. The aim of this study is to examine further the Multiple Prayers for Wedding Brides When Carrying Out Walimah Al'urs from the Perspective of Sheikh Alwi Ahmad Saqqaf and Imam Asy-Syaukani. The research method used is normative sociological research method, which is comparative. The results of the study show that there are multiple prayers for the bride and groom when carrying out a wedding party (walimah al 'urs), so some scholars allow it and some do not. Among these opinions is the opinion of Sheikh Alwi Ahmad Saqqaf that it is permissible to pray multiple prayers when there is a need or an excuse. Meanwhile, another opinion is the opinion of Imam Asy-Syaukani that it is permissible to pray together only because of rain, fear and illness. So the most relevant relation to the existing case chronology is the opinion of Sheikh Alwi Ahma Saqqof. Namely those who say it is permissible to make plural taqdim absolutely other than because of traveling, illness, and for other than the two of other reasons.
Pelecehan Seksual di Kalangan Pelajar Menurut Fiqh Jinayah dan UU No. 12 Tahun 2022 Tentang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual Studi Kasus Kecamatan Wampu Kabupaten Langkat Astuti, Puji Tri; Marpaung, Aripin; Lubis, Syofiati
MASALIQ Vol 3 No 5 (2023): SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/masaliq.v3i5.1731

Abstract

Criminal acts do not yet have provisions that are expressly contained in Islamic law. Al-Quran and hadith do not explicitly regulate this issue. That is, regarding legal matters of understanding sexuality it is not mentioned in the realm of ḥudud's finger, the same is the case with adultery. The handling of juridical cases that limit sexual orientation experiences problems, especially regarding the formulation of criminal acts or delicts. The type of research used is through comparative sociological normative methods. Normative research is carried out by examining library materials which are secondary data, while sociological/empirical legal research methods are carried out by examining primary data obtained directly in the community. This study also uses a comparative approach (Comparative Approach) is research that is comparative in nature, which is compared both in the form of similarities and differences. The results showed that: 1) Sexual harassment is an act that includes dirty or indecent verbal expressions (comments, jokes and so on), indecent behavior, showing pornographic/obscene images, assault and indecent coercion such as forcing to kiss and hugging, threatening to buy a woman if she refuses to provide sexual services, to deception. Factors that influence the occurrence of sexual division among students are internal and external factors.
THE ACT OF KILLING A MUGGER IN SELF-DEFENSE: A PERSPECTIVE FROM ISLAMIC CRIMINAL LAW AND THE INDONESIAN PENAL CODE Sirait, Riziq Rabbani Iwanka; Marpaung, Aripin
Jurnal Sosiologi Dialektika Sosial Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): Maret
Publisher : Program Studi Sosiologi Universitas Malikussaleh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29103/jsds.v11i1.20584

Abstract

This study aims to explore the legal perspective on killing a robber in self-defense according to Islamic Criminal Law (Fiqh Jinayah) and Indonesian Positive Law. The method used is library research. The findings indicate that many people still lack a clear understanding of the legal provisions regarding killing a robber in self-defense. Meanwhile, cases of robbery targeting personal belongings such as motorcycles, bicycles, and other valuables continue to occur frequently in various regions. This lack of understanding leads to uncertainty when facing such threats, even in situations where the victim may lose their life. In Islamic Criminal Law, self-defense resulting in the death of an attacker can be justified if certain conditions are met, such as a real threat to life or honor. In Indonesian Positive Law, self-defense is regulated in the Criminal Code (KUHP), which provides legal protection to victims who defend themselves proportionally. This study emphasizes the importance of legal education for the public so that individuals understand their rights and limitations when acting in self-defense against criminal acts like robbery.
Pertunjukan Musik Dangdut dalam Walimah Al-Urs Menurut Undang-Undang dan Fatwa MUI (Studi Kasus Kecamatan Teluk Nibung Kota Tanjung Balai) Marpaung, Aripin
Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research (Special Issue)
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/innovative.v4i3.12518

Abstract

Di era modern ini pertunjukan musik dangdut di walimah urs sudah menjadi tradisi dalam keseharian masyarakat, dan pesta pernikahan merupakan hal yang sakral dan penting, sehingga memakan waktu yang lama dan biaya yang besar. Pertunjukan musik dangdut di walimah kita menjadi tranding topik dan kebanggaan sebagian masyarakat, pada kenyataannya kita bisa melihat dan berjalan ketika masyarakat walimah kita akan mengadakan beberapa pertunjukan di dalamnya dengan menampilkan musik dangdut di dalamnya. Permasalahan penelitian ini adalah bagaimana menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 44 Tahun 2008 tentang Pornografi dan Fatwa MUI Nomor 287 Tahun 2001 tentang Pornografi dan Pornoaksi. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode deskripsi dengan penelitian kualitatif. Metode ini merupakan metode sosiologis normatibe. Sumber dalam penelitian ini adalah masyarakat di Kecamatan Teluk Nibung, dan data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah wawancara dengan masyarakat di Kecamatan Teluk Nibung.
Hukum Merokok Rokok Elektrik (Vape) Prespektif Imam Al-Bajuri Dan Yusuf Al-Qardhawi Marpaung, Aripin
Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research (Special Issue)
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/innovative.v4i3.12519

Abstract

Setiap manusia di seluruh belahan dunia memiliki berbagai macam kebiasaan. Salah satu kebiasaan itu adalah merokok merokok. Merokok bukanlah hal yang dianggap tabu oleh masyarakat, rokok sudah menjadi benda yang sudah tidak asing lagi bagi manusia pada umumnya pada kenyataannya kebiasaan merokok ini sulit dihilangkan. Pada kesempatan ini peneliti akan mencoba mengangkat sebuah tema Hukum Merokok rokok elektrik (Vape) perspektif imam Al-bajuri dan Yusuf Al-Qardhawi.
Menjamak Sholat Bagi Pengantin yang Melaksanakan Walimah Al ’Urs Perspektif Syekh Alwi Ahmad Saqqaf dan Imam Asy-Syaukani Mayunda, Usdha Lifa; Marpaung, Aripin
AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Vol. 4 No. 2 (2022)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah INSURI Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almanhaj.v4i2.2023

Abstract

In the current era of progress, the wedding party (walimah al 'urs) is considered by some people as something that must be fulfilled when someone is married. Its raelitas can be seen when there is a wedding party (walimah al 'urs), some of the bride and groom will leave the prayer, some of them do their obligations after the prayer time is over and some of them choose plural. In this case the author takes the strongest opinion after munaqasyah al-adillah, namely the opinion of Sheikh Alwi Ahmad Saqqaf. The aim of this study is to examine further the Multiple Prayers for Wedding Brides When Carrying Out Walimah Al'urs from the Perspective of Sheikh Alwi Ahmad Saqqaf and Imam Asy-Syaukani. The research method used is normative sociological research method, which is comparative. The results of the study show that there are multiple prayers for the bride and groom when carrying out a wedding party (walimah al 'urs), so some scholars allow it and some do not. Among these opinions is the opinion of Sheikh Alwi Ahmad Saqqaf that it is permissible to pray multiple prayers when there is a need or an excuse. Meanwhile, another opinion is the opinion of Imam Asy-Syaukani that it is permissible to pray together only because of rain, fear and illness. So the most relevant relation to the existing case chronology is the opinion of Sheikh Alwi Ahma Saqqof. Namely those who say it is permissible to make plural taqdim absolutely other than because of traveling, illness, and for other than the two of other reasons.
The Law of Bribery in the Judiciary: A Comparative Analysis of the Opinions of Yusuf Qardhawi and Asy-Syaukani Marpaung, Aripin
JURNAL AKTA Vol 11, No 4 (2024): December 2024
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v11i4.40686

Abstract

This research focuses on the principle of justice in Islamic law, which is seen as the main foundation for the entire sharia legal system, especially in the context of bribery cases in upholding rights and eliminating injustice. The main objective of this research is to understand the limitations and exceptions related to the law of bribery according to the views of two major scholars, Yusuf al-Qaradawi and Asy-Syaukani, and how the concept of maqasid sharia (the purpose of sharia) is applied in emergency situations that allow the permissibility of bribery. The research method used is a comparative analysis between the two views, by exploring the background of the arguments and the underlying context of Islamic law. The results show that Yusuf al-Qaradawi permits bribery in urgent emergencies, especially when it is the only way to defend a neglected right or eliminate injustice, after all legitimate efforts allowed by religion have been taken. In contrast, Asy-Syaukani forbids bribery absolutely without exception, based on the generality of the hadith that forbids the practice of bribery. In this comparison, Asy-Syaukani's view is considered stronger in terms of evidence, but in the current context, Yusuf al-Qaradawi's view is considered more relevant to the conditions in Indonesia, where bribery is sometimes used as a way to defend rights in urgent situations.The conclusion of this study confirms that the maqasid principle of sharia, which includes the fulfillment of emergency needs (dharuriyyat), general needs (hajiyyat), and refinement (tahsiniyyat), can be the basis for the permissibility of bribery under certain conditions. The legal consequences of bribery in order to defend rights are imposed on the recipient of the bribe and its intermediaries, while the bribe giver is not subject to sanctions because the aim is to claim legitimate rights.
Perceraian di Luar Pengadilan dalam Fiqh Kontemporer dan Implikasinya Terhadap Perlindungan Hak Perempuan dan Hak Anak Marpaung, Aripin; Harahap, Rusman; Sipahutar, Niko Irwanda; Siregar, Umairoh Adawiyah; Asshiddqy, Zaqi
Journal of Innovative and Creativity Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/joecy.v6i1.6879

Abstract

Perceraian di luar pengadilan masih banyak dilakukan karena dianggap sah secara agama dan lebih mudah dilaksanakan. Namun, praktik ini sering menimbulkan berbagai persoalan, terutama yang berkaitan dengan perlindungan hak perempuan dan anak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji perceraian di luar pengadilan dalam perspektif fikih kontemporer serta menganalisis dampaknya terhadap perlindungan hak perempuan dan anak. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah studi pustaka dengan menelaah buku, artikel ilmiah, dan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berkaitan dengan perceraian dan hukum keluarga. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perceraian di luar pengadilan cenderung menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum, terutama bagi perempuan yang kehilangan hak nafkah dan perlindungan pasca-perceraian. Anak-anak juga berisiko tidak mendapatkan hak nafkah dan pengasuhan yang layak karena tidak adanya keputusan hukum yang jelas. Dalam pandangan fikih kontemporer, perceraian perlu dilihat dari dampaknya dalam kehidupan nyata, bukan hanya dari sah atau tidaknya ucapan talak. Oleh karena itu, perceraian melalui pengadilan dipandang penting sebagai upaya melindungi hak perempuan dan anak serta menjaga keadilan dalam kehidupan keluarga.
Fanatisme Mazhab dalam Perspektif Fikih Kontemporer: Analisis Konseptual dan Implikasinya terhadap Kehidupan Sosial Keagamaan Marpaung, Aripin; Roji, Muhammad Zakwan; Silalahi, Adnan Zuhdi; Oktobery, Nur Ade Amelia; Fadilah, Nur; Hakim, Muhammad Arif Rahman
Al-Hikmah Media Dakwah, Komunikasi, Sosial dan Kebudayaan Vol 16 No 2 (2025): Al-Hikmah Media Dakwah, Komunikasi, Sosial dan Kebudayaan
Publisher : DEPARTEMENT OF COMMUNICATION AND ISLAMIC BROADCASTING STUDIES

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/hikmah.v16i2.13765

Abstract

Islam, which fundamentally promotes unity and tolerance, has historically accommodated a plurality of Islamic jurisprudential schools (mazhab) formed through scholarly legal reasoning (ijtihad). However, contemporary Muslim societies increasingly experience school-based fanaticism, manifested in rigid allegiance to a particular school of thought and the delegitimization of alternative interpretations. Despite its prevalence, this phenomenon remains insufficiently examined within the framework of contemporary Islamic jurisprudence. This study aims to conceptualize school-based fanaticism and to analyze its dimensions, characteristics, underlying causes, and socio-religious impacts. Employing a qualitative library-based research design, this study systematically examines classical and contemporary Islamic legal sources using a comparative and analytical approach. The findings demonstrate that school-based fanaticism operates at both individual and collective levels and is characterized by epistemic rigidity, absolutist truth claims, and tendencies toward social fragmentation. The study identifies several contributing factors, including limited engagement with authoritative Islamic scholarship, the amplifying role of unregulated digital media, and political instrumentalization of jurisprudential differences. While its impacts are predominantly negative—such as heightened sectarian tension and weakened communal cohesion—this study also acknowledges a constructive potential when school adherence is grounded in ethical scholarship and intellectual discipline. Overall, the study emphasizes the importance of strengthening religious literacy, promoting jurisprudential moderation (wasatiyyah), and fostering respect for interpretive diversity as strategic responses to school-based fanaticism in contemporary Islamic societies.