Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.503
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal LAW REFORM Jurnal Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan Jurnal Pengabdian dan Peningkatan Mutu Masyarakat (JANAYU) Constitutionale Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan JRP (Jurnal Review Politik)
Iswandi, Kelik
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 8 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 8 Documents
Search

 1 
Kedudukan State Auxiliary Organ dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan di Indonesia Iswandi, Kelik; Prasetyoningsih, Nanik
Jurnal Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 1, No 2 (2020): SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (347.13 KB) | DOI: 10.18196/jphk.1208

Abstract

Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengkaji kedudukan state auxiliary organ yang merupakan Lembaga negara resmi negara tetapi tidak dijelaskan dengan rinci kedudukan state auxiliary organ dalam konstitusi.  Pembagian kekuasaan pada cabang-cabang khusus kekuasaan dalam negara hukum bertujuan untuk menghindari terpusatnya kekuasaan pada satu titik yang berakibat kesewenang-wenangan. Indonesia tidak menerapkan pembagian kekuasaan trias politica secara murni. Di Indonesia lembaga negara terbagi menjadi constitutional state organ dan state auxiliary organ. Constitutional state organ memiliki kedudukan yang sangat jelas dalam ketatanegaraan, tetapi state auxiliary organ tidak memiliki kedudukan yang jelas.  State auxiliary organ sendiri terbentuk dengan berbagai macam variasi bentuk yang berdampak terhadap ketidakjelasan kedudukannya. Metode analisis deskriptif dipergunakan dalam penelitian hukum normatif untuk menganalisis data sekunder yang diperoleh melalui kajian kepustakaan. Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa state auxiliary organ di Indonesia memiliki berbagai kedudukan. Kedudukan state auxiliary organ dapat ditentukan melalui kedudukan berdasarkan aturan pembentuknya, kedudukan berdasarkan independensi kelembagaannya, dan kedudukan berdasarkan tugas dan fungsinya. Kata Kunci: constitutional state organ, state auxiliary organ, trias politica
Kedudukan State Auxiliary Organ dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan di Indonesia Iswandi, Kelik; Prasetyoningsih, Nanik
Jurnal Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 1, No 2 (2020): SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (347.13 KB) | DOI: 10.18196/jphk.1208

Abstract

Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengkaji kedudukan state auxiliary organ yang merupakan Lembaga negara resmi negara tetapi tidak dijelaskan dengan rinci kedudukan state auxiliary organ dalam konstitusi.  Pembagian kekuasaan pada cabang-cabang khusus kekuasaan dalam negara hukum bertujuan untuk menghindari terpusatnya kekuasaan pada satu titik yang berakibat kesewenang-wenangan. Indonesia tidak menerapkan pembagian kekuasaan trias politica secara murni. Di Indonesia lembaga negara terbagi menjadi constitutional state organ dan state auxiliary organ. Constitutional state organ memiliki kedudukan yang sangat jelas dalam ketatanegaraan, tetapi state auxiliary organ tidak memiliki kedudukan yang jelas.  State auxiliary organ sendiri terbentuk dengan berbagai macam variasi bentuk yang berdampak terhadap ketidakjelasan kedudukannya. Metode analisis deskriptif dipergunakan dalam penelitian hukum normatif untuk menganalisis data sekunder yang diperoleh melalui kajian kepustakaan. Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa state auxiliary organ di Indonesia memiliki berbagai kedudukan. Kedudukan state auxiliary organ dapat ditentukan melalui kedudukan berdasarkan aturan pembentuknya, kedudukan berdasarkan independensi kelembagaannya, dan kedudukan berdasarkan tugas dan fungsinya. Kata Kunci: constitutional state organ, state auxiliary organ, trias politica
PENGEMBANGAN POTENSI DESA WISATA PADUKUHAN TAWANGREJO, PURWOBINANGUN, PAKEM, SLEMAN Prasetyoningsih, Nanik; Iswandi, Kelik; Wardhana, Allan; Mujiyana, Mujiyana; Putra, Ilham; Wrediningsih, Sri
Jurnal Pengabdian dan Peningkatan Mutu Masyarakat (Janayu) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023): Jurnal Pengabdian dan Peningkatan Mutu Masyarakat
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/janayu.v4i1.22972

Abstract

This PKM Community Service Program is being carried out in collaboration with the governments of Padukuhan Tawangrejo, Purwobinangun, Pakem. The UMY PKM team will assist the Tawangrejo Educational Tourism Village Pioneer Team, which has struggled to build and develop the Tawangrejo educational tourism village concept. This Service Program is carried out through a Workshop on Tourism Village Management and Establishment and Field Trips to review the Tawangrejo Area, which will be used as a tourist destination. The workshop was held to improve the Tourism Village Pioneer Team's understanding of managing and establishing a tourist village. The field trip results were then discussed, as was the possibility of structuring the tourist location area and the projection of the establishment of a tourist village, which was then documented in the documentation "Plan for the Establishment of the Tawangrejo Tourism Village." This document will serve as a guideline and direction for the Tourism Village's establishment and future development.
Supreme Court's Legal Advice: Limits, Procedures, and Need for Change Iswandi, Kelik
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 13 No 3 (2024)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.13.3.2024.607-634

Abstract

The Supreme Court offers legal advice to state organs and government agencies. Nonetheless, there are no regulations governing the execution of Supreme Court Legal Advice. This paper analyses the limitations and procedures of Supreme Court legal advice. This is a normative legal analysis grounded in conceptual and statutory law. This study utilized legal texts, doctrinal sources, and scientific material. This study employs Miles and Huberman's data analysis methodology. This study demonstrates that Article 37 of the 1985 Supreme Court Law and Article 22 paragraph (1) of the 2009 Judicial Power Law are contradictory. The dispute pertains to the petitioner seeking Supreme Court Legal Advice. The Supreme Court's Legal Advice is only extended to state organs and government agencies. The Supreme Court lacks the authority to offer legal advice to local governments, community organizations, and non-governmental organizations. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court offers legal advice to state organs, while the Chairman of the Supreme Court Chamber provides legal advice to government agencies. Both legal advice continues to be designated as Supreme Court Legal Advice.
Progressive Legal Approaches of the Constitutional Justice Reasoning on Judicial Review Cases: Challenges or Opportunities? Wijayanti, Septi Nur; ALW, Lita Tyesta; Lailam, Tanto; Iswandi, Kelik
LAW REFORM Vol 21, No 2 (2025): Law Reform
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO SEMARANG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/lr.v21i2.66334

Abstract

The Constitutional Court often uses a positive legal approach, and some of the decisions it produces do not contain substantive justice. In its development, the Constitutional Court began to face a new paradigm as an institution for interpreting the constitution and began to use a progressive legal approach. This study aims to examine the application of a positivist legal approach and the urgency of using the progressive legal approach in the law review process. This research is normative legal research. Based on the results of this research, the Indonesian legal system is designed to accommodate human interests and needs through progressive legislation. The Constitutional Court, through a progressive legal approach, can issue decisions that fulfill substantive justice. This research is used in several cases, such as the heart article decision, ultra petite, and open legal policy. It can be concluded that through a progressive legal approach, it is a challenge for judges to guard the constitution through judicial review and an opportunity to prove that the Constitutional Court is an institution that prioritizes the constitutional rights of the people. In addition, the Constitutional Court can restore its spirit as the guardian of the constitution and democracy.
Supreme Court's Legal Advice: Limits, Procedures, and Need for Change Iswandi, Kelik
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 13 No 3 (2024)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.13.3.2024.607-634

Abstract

The Supreme Court offers legal advice to state organs and government agencies. Nonetheless, there are no regulations governing the execution of Supreme Court Legal Advice. This paper analyses the limitations and procedures of Supreme Court legal advice. This is a normative legal analysis grounded in conceptual and statutory law. This study utilized legal texts, doctrinal sources, and scientific material. This study employs Miles and Huberman's data analysis methodology. This study demonstrates that Article 37 of the 1985 Supreme Court Law and Article 22 paragraph (1) of the 2009 Judicial Power Law are contradictory. The dispute pertains to the petitioner seeking Supreme Court Legal Advice. The Supreme Court's Legal Advice is only extended to state organs and government agencies. The Supreme Court lacks the authority to offer legal advice to local governments, community organizations, and non-governmental organizations. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court offers legal advice to state organs, while the Chairman of the Supreme Court Chamber provides legal advice to government agencies. Both legal advice continues to be designated as Supreme Court Legal Advice.
Extending the Legal Standing on Authority Disputes at the Indonesian Constitutional Court Iswandi, Kelik
Constitutionale Vol 4 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/constitutionale.v4i2.3167

Abstract

The growth of state auxiliary organs increases the possibility of conflicting authority. Regrettably, the Indonesian Constitutional Court can only settle authority disputes between constitutional state organs. It is based on Article 24C 1945 Constitution jo. Article 61 Constitutional Court Act 2003 jo. Article 2 Constitutional Court Regulation No. 08/PMK/2006. Thus, how does does authority dispute resolution involve state auxiliary organs? This subject is addressed by normative legal research, which examines secondary evidence in the form of laws, Constitutional Court decisions, and doctrines. Based on the statutatory and conceptual approaches, it is found that the rule of legal standing leads to multiple interpretations about which state organ can have a legal standing in the constitutional court. Furthermore, the legal standing requirements are quite narrow and need to be strengthened to respond to the constitutional dynamics in Indonesia, particularly with the emergence of state auxiliary organs. According to this study, state auxiliary organs, particularly those with constitutional importance, can fulfill legal standing standards. While for the authority dispute which involves other state auxiliary organs, it can be resolved based on their legitimacy. Therefore, Constitutional Court Regulation No. 08/PMK/2006 must be revised to accommodate the settlement of authority disputes between state auxiliary organs.
Increasing Political Participation and Capacity of Indigenous Papuans: Encouraging Adaptive Collaborative Governance Iswandi, Kelik
Jurnal Review Politik Vol. 13 No. 2 (2023): December
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Filsafat UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/jrp.2023.13.2.294-317

Abstract

This paper delves into the potential of collaborative governance in addressing conflict resolution in Papua, focusing on the marginalized Indigenous Papuans (OAP) affected by shifting management policies. The conflict stems from historical injustices and capacity disparities between OAP and non-OAP. It aims to introduce collaborative governance, emphasizing reconciliation and adaptive approaches, particularly capacity building, and identifies potential implementation hurdles. Using normative research methodology with secondary data, the hypothesis proposes enhancing OAP capacity and participation to facilitate collaborative processes. Despite LPDP scholarships' ineffectiveness, a structured roadmap is essential for fostering collaborative governance. Furthermore, engaging the private sector is crucial, leveraging its information-seeking capabilities to enhance program efficacy. Collaboration with the private sector should align with OAP interests, aiding capacity building through education and training initiatives
Co-Authors Ilham Putra Lita Tyesta ALW Mujiyana Mujiyana Nanik Prasetyoningsih Septi Nur Wijayanti Tanto Lailam Wardhana, Allan Wrediningsih, Sri