Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Peran Pegawai Pencatat Nikah (PPN) Dalam Mencegah Perkawinan Di Bawah Umur Di Kecamatan Jambi Selatan Kota Jambi Balqis Salsabila, Fadhilah; Amin Qodri, Muhammad; Muhammad Daud Abdul Kadir, Sulhi
Zaaken: Journal of Civil and Business Law Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): Juni 2024
Publisher : Universitas Jambi, Fakultas Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/zaaken.v5i2.32361

Child marriage is a marriage conducted by prospective brides and grooms who have not yet reached the age limit set by Law Number 16 of 2019 concerning Amendments to Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning marriage, which is 19 years for both men and women. In order for marriage to be achieved, underage marriages must be prevented through the role played by Marriage Registration Officers. (PPN). This research aims to identify the factors causing underage marriages in the South Jambi District of Jambi City and the role of Marriage Registration Officers (PPN) in preventing underage marriages in the South Jambi District of Jambi City. This study is an empirical legal research. The results obtained indicate that the factors causing underage marriages are free association, premarital pregnancy, family, education, and population. The role performed by PPN is to provide guidance, socialization, and counseling. However, the role performed by PPN is still not optimal in providing understanding related to underage marriage. The guidance provided by the PPN is also less effective because it is only given to prospective brides and grooms who have already registered and are about to get married. Ideally, guidance and direction should first be provided to the prospective bride and groom before expressing the desire to marry and registering at the KUA Jambi Selatan. Even if necessary, periodically, PPN can schedule when to conduct socialization related to providing information, both directly and about the side effects of underage marriage, to couples of reproductive age or teenagers still in high school and university

Implementasi Penyaluran Zakat Oleh Badan Amil Zakat Nasional Kota Jambi Kepada Korban Pinjaman Online Syelvita, Rema; Amin Qodri, Muhammad; Alissa, Evalina
Zaaken: Journal of Civil and Business Law Vol. 5 No. 3 (2024): Oktober 2024
Publisher : Universitas Jambi, Fakultas Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/zaaken.v5i3.38124

This study aims to explore the role of the National Amil Zakat Agency (BAZNAS) of Jambi City in assisting individuals burdened with debt, including those who have fallen victim to online loans. Although the phenomenon of online loans has caused many people to face financial difficulties due to high interest rates and inhumane collection practices, the findings of this study show that, to date, no one has directly sought assistance from BAZNAS Jambi City as a result of being a victim of online loans. Generally, those seeking assistance from BAZNAS are individuals in debt to meet basic needs or cover medical expenses, with between one and five people receiving help each year. First, BAZNAS performs an identification step to make sure that the debt was used for legitimate purposes. Priority is given to impoverished individuals who are in genuine need. Through a descriptive qualitative approach and case studies in Jambi City, this research examines the effectiveness of zakat distribution by BAZNAS in assisting indebted individuals. The findings indicate that while zakat can alleviate financial burdens, its effectiveness needs to be enhanced through broader public education and more accurate identification mechanisms to reach more victims of online loans and others in financial distress.

Disparitas Putusan Pengadilan Terhadap Izin Poligami Dalam Perspektif Kepastian Hukum (Studi Putusan Nomor 692/Pdt.G/2019/Pa.Plh Dan Nomor 0007/Pdt.G/2019/Pa.Lpk) Zahra, Rahima; Amin Qodri, Muhammad; Syelvita, Rema
Recital Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): Volume 6 Nomor 2 Juli 2024
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/rr.v6i2.48020

Abstract This study analyzes the disparity in judicial decisions on polygamy permits by comparing two Religious Court rulings with identical legal conditions but different outcomes. Decision No. 692/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Plh granted the permit despite the applicant not meeting the alternative requirements of Article 4(2) of the Marriage Law, citing fulfillment of Article 5(1). Conversely, Decision No. 0007/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Lpk involved the same shortfall under Article 4(2), yet the judge rejected the request, deeming those requirements absolute and not subject to Article 5. Employing a normative-juridical method, this research dissects judges’ reasoning in final decisions. Findings reveal that divergent interpretations of Articles 4 and 5 are the root of the disparity. Such inconsistency highlights normative ambiguity and risks legal uncertainty. Accordingly, revisions to Articles 4 and 5 of the Marriage Law—and technical guidelines from the Supreme Court via SEMA or PERMA are necessary to prevent decision disparities and ensure legal certainty in polygamy cases. Keywords: Decision Disparity; Polygamy Permit; Judges' Consideration, Polygamy Requirement Abstrak Penelitian ini menganalisis terkait disparitas putusan hakim dalam perkara izin poligami dengan membandingkan dua putusan Pengadilan Agama yang memiliki kondisi hukum serupa namun menghasilkan putusan berbeda. Putusan No. 692/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Plh mengabulkan permohonan poligami meskipun pemohon tidak memenuhi salah satu syarat alternatif dalam Pasal 4 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Perkawinan, dengan alasan syarat-syarat dalam Pasal 5 ayat (1) telah dipenuhi. Sebaliknya, Putusan No. 0007/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Lpk juga menghadapi kondisi di mana pemohon tidak memenuhi Pasal 4 ayat (2), namun hakim di dalam pertimbangannya menolak permohonan karena menilai bahwa syarat dalam Pasal 4 ayat (2) bersifat mutlak dan tidak dapat dikesampingkan meskipun Pasal 5 telah dipenuhi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis Disparitas Putusan Pengadilan Terhadap Izin Poligami Dalam Perspektif Kepastian Hukum (Studi Putusan Nomor 692/Pdt.G/2019/Pa.Plh Dan Nomor 0007/Pdt.G/2019/Pa.Lpk) normatif dengan melihat dan menganalisis pertimbangan hakim dalam putusan yang telah memiliki kekuatan hukum tetap. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa perbedaan interpretasi hakim terhadap hubungan antara Pasal 4 dan Pasal 5 menjadi penyebab utama disparitas. Ketidakkonsistenan ini mencerminkan adanya kekaburan norma dan berpotensi menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan revisi terhadap Pasal 4 dan Pasal 5 Undang-Undang Perkawinan, serta pedoman teknis dari Mahkamah Agung melalui SEMA atau PERMA untuk mencegah disparitas putusan dan menjamin kepastian hukum dalam perkara izin poligami. Kata kunci: Disparitas Putusan; Izin Poligami; Pertimbangan Hakim; Syarat Poligami.

Perkawinan Beda Agama Berdasarkan Yurisprudensi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Ridho, Muhamad; Amin Qodri, Muhammad; Triganda Sayuti, Ageng
Zaaken: Journal of Civil and Business Law Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023): Februari
Publisher : Universitas Jambi, Fakultas Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/zaaken.v4i1.21632

This study aims to discover the judge's consideration in the Supreme Court Decision, Number 1400 K/Pdt/1986, and the Supreme Court Decision, Number 1977 K/Pdt/2017 regarding the differences in decisions towards interfaith marriages. Furthermore, the methodology used in this study is the Normative Juridical, namely research in the form of an inventory of applicable laws, which seeks to find the principles or philosophical basis of the law or study in the form of legal efforts findings within a particular case. Based on the result, it may be stated that the regulation of interfaith marriages in Indonesia had legal protection itself in terms of marriage. Nevertheless, the interfaith marriage polemic in terms of its regulation in the marriage's laws is not being strictly regulated and written whether it is prohibited or permitted. Moreover, the inconsistency of marriage law in regulation of interfaith marriage gives rise to a conflict of legal norms in establishing or deciding decision from the state of the court ruling to the supreme court's jurisprudential decision. Abstrak Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pertimbangan hakim di dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1400 K/Pdt/1986 dan Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1977 K/Pdt/2017 terkait perbedaan putusan terhadap perkawinan beda agama. Adapun metodologi yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian Yuridis Normatif, yaitu penelitian berupa inventarisasi perundang-undangan yang berlaku, berupaya mencari asas-asas atau dasar falsafah dari perundang-undangan tersebut, atau penelitian yang berupa usaha penemuan hukum yang sesuai dengan suatu kasus tertentu. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dapat dikemukakan bahwa Pengaturan Perkawinan beda agama di Indonesia telah mempunyai payung hukum dalam hal perkawinan, namun polemik perkawinan beda agama dalam pengaturannya di Undang-Undang Perkawinan belum diatur secara tegas dan tertulis apakah dilarang atau diperbolehkan pelaksanaannya. Ketidaktegasan Undang-Undang Perkawinan dalam mengatur perkawinan beda agama menimbulkan konflik norma hukum dalam menetapkan atau memutuskan Putusan dari Penetapan Pengadilan Negeri hingga Putusan Yurisprudensi Mahkamah Agung.

Title

Found 4 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 4 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 4 Documents
Search