Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.983
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Privat Law Privat Law International Journal of Educational Research and Social Sciences (IJERSC)
Sentot Sudarwanto, Albertus
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
TANGGUNG JAWAB NOTARIS YANG MEMILIKI KEWENANGAN PPAT DALAM PEMBUATAN SURAT KUASA MEMBEBANKAN HAK TANGGUNGAN Waringga Y., Stefanie; Sentot Sudarwanto, Albertus
Jurnal Privat Law Vol 8, No 2 (2020): JULI-DESEMBER
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/privat.v8i2.48425

Abstract

AbstractThis article aims to review the responsibilities of a notary who has a position as an Acting Land Acting  Officer (PPAT) in making a Power of Attorney to Charge Mortgage. This legal research uses empirical research methods, namely examining primary data in the field then proceed with secondary data. SKMHT must be made with a notary deed or deed of Land Deed Maker (PPAT), this is in line with what has been written and stipulated in Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Underwriting Rights (UUHT). Making SKMHT made by a notary is guided by Article 38 of Act Number 2 of 2014 juncto Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Position, whereas if the manufacture is carried out by PPAT then follow the rules stated in the Regulation of the Head of National Land Agency Number 8 2012 (Perkaban 8/2012). The implementation of related regulations that have been written and stipulated is in fact there is a conflict issue, namely that there is a provision of notaries required to make SKMHT using the SKMHT format which is regulated in Perkaban Number 8 of 2012.Keywords: Responsible; Notary; PPAT; Deed of Power of Attorney to Charge MortgageAbstrakArtikel ini bertujuan mengkaji mengenai tanggung jawab notaris yang memiliki jabatan sebagai Pejabat  Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) di dalam membuat Surat Kuasa Membebankan Hak Tanggungan (SKMHT). Penelitian hukum ini menggunakan metode penelitian empiris, yaitu meneliti data primer di lapangan kemudian dilanjutkan dengan data sekunder. SKMHT wajib dibuat dengan akta notaris atau akta Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT), hal ini selaras dengan yang telah tertulis dan ditetapkan di dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1996 tentang Hak Tanggungan (UUHT). Pembuatan SKMHT yang dibuat oleh notaris berpedoman pada Pasal 38 Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 juncto UndangUndang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris, sedangkan apabila pembuatannya dilakukan oleh PPAT maka mengikuti aturan yang telah tertera di dalam Peraturan Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Nomor 8 Tahun 2012 (Perkaban 8/2012). Implementasi regulasi terkait yang telah ditulis dan ditetapkan tersebut nyatanya justru terdapat persoalan, yakni bahwa ada ketentuan notaris diwajibkan membuat SKMHT dengan menggunakan format SKMHT yang diatur di dalam Perkaban Nomor 8 Tahun 2012.Kata Kunci: Tanggung Jawab; Notaris; PPAT;  Akta SKMHT
TANGGUNG JAWAB NOTARIS YANG MEMILIKI KEWENANGAN PPAT DALAM PEMBUATAN SURAT KUASA MEMBEBANKAN HAK TANGGUNGAN Waringga Y., Stefanie; Sentot Sudarwanto, Albertus
Jurnal Privat Law Vol 8, No 2 (2020): JULI-DESEMBER
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/privat.v8i2.48425

Abstract

AbstractThis article aims to review the responsibilities of a notary who has a position as an Acting Land Acting  Officer (PPAT) in making a Power of Attorney to Charge Mortgage. This legal research uses empirical research methods, namely examining primary data in the field then proceed with secondary data. SKMHT must be made with a notary deed or deed of Land Deed Maker (PPAT), this is in line with what has been written and stipulated in Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Underwriting Rights (UUHT). Making SKMHT made by a notary is guided by Article 38 of Act Number 2 of 2014 juncto Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Position, whereas if the manufacture is carried out by PPAT then follow the rules stated in the Regulation of the Head of National Land Agency Number 8 2012 (Perkaban 8/2012). The implementation of related regulations that have been written and stipulated is in fact there is a conflict issue, namely that there is a provision of notaries required to make SKMHT using the SKMHT format which is regulated in Perkaban Number 8 of 2012.Keywords: Responsible; Notary; PPAT; Deed of Power of Attorney to Charge MortgageAbstrakArtikel ini bertujuan mengkaji mengenai tanggung jawab notaris yang memiliki jabatan sebagai Pejabat  Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) di dalam membuat Surat Kuasa Membebankan Hak Tanggungan (SKMHT). Penelitian hukum ini menggunakan metode penelitian empiris, yaitu meneliti data primer di lapangan kemudian dilanjutkan dengan data sekunder. SKMHT wajib dibuat dengan akta notaris atau akta Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT), hal ini selaras dengan yang telah tertulis dan ditetapkan di dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1996 tentang Hak Tanggungan (UUHT). Pembuatan SKMHT yang dibuat oleh notaris berpedoman pada Pasal 38 Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 juncto UndangUndang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris, sedangkan apabila pembuatannya dilakukan oleh PPAT maka mengikuti aturan yang telah tertera di dalam Peraturan Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Nomor 8 Tahun 2012 (Perkaban 8/2012). Implementasi regulasi terkait yang telah ditulis dan ditetapkan tersebut nyatanya justru terdapat persoalan, yakni bahwa ada ketentuan notaris diwajibkan membuat SKMHT dengan menggunakan format SKMHT yang diatur di dalam Perkaban Nomor 8 Tahun 2012.Kata Kunci: Tanggung Jawab; Notaris; PPAT;  Akta SKMHT
Issues Of The Land Office In Determining Land Rights On Duplicate Certificates Ivana Wulandari; Sentot Sudarwanto, Albertus; Purwadi, Hari
International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): February 2024 ( Indonesia - Malaysia )
Publisher : CV. Inara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51601/ijersc.v5i1.769

Abstract

Land is one of the fundamental sources of human life, ensuring human survival. Every individual who owns land requires proof of ownership, namely a land certificate, which is issued by the Land Office. Certificates can be issued upon land registration with the aim of providing protection and legal certainty to land rights holders. However, it is not uncommon for issues to arise with some land certificates, leading to legal disputes, such as Duplicate Certificates. The purpose of this research is to identify, analyze, and examine the issues in determining land rights holders in cases of Duplicate Certificates. This research employs an empirical legal research approach, conducted at the Land Office of the ATR/BPN in Klaten Regency. It is supported by literature review to obtain necessary data such as theories, doctrines, principles, and other legal provisions. Secondary legal sources used include textbooks, legal dictionaries, legal journals, and commentaries on court decisions, which are relevant to primary legal sources and aid in the analysis of this research. The findings of this research indicate that the issue arises when disputing parties fail to reach an agreement through mediation, leading to legal proceedings in court and ultimately, a binding legal decision.
Legal Actions Of Notaries Who Feel Aggrieved By The Decision Of The PTUN Court On Dismissal In PTUN Decision Number 200/PK/2022 In Jakarta Susanti, Santi; Sentot Sudarwanto, Albertus; Tuhana, Tuhana
International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): April 2024 ( Indonesia - Kenya - Libya )
Publisher : CV. Inara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51601/ijersc.v5i2.787

Abstract

As a public official, a Notary can be dishonorably dismissed if proven to have committed a criminal offense, as stipulated in the Notary Position Law. Although regulations related to dishonorable dismissal for notaries already exist, they are considered somewhat unclear. The issues discussed in this study include the substance of legal remedies for notaries who are dishonorably dismissed due to criminal convictions with a threat of less than five years. The research method used is normative juridical, with data collection through document study and literature review. The analytical approach used is qualitative. The research findings regarding the substance show that criminal offenses that can lead to dishonorable dismissal for notaries are criminal offenses with a prison sentence of 5 (five) years or more that have obtained legal force, whether committed in a personal or official capacity. Furthermore, the legal remedy for a Notary who is faced with dishonorable dismissal when convicted with a sentence of less than five years is to file a lawsuit to the State Administrative Court. This lawsuit is addressed to the Minister of Law and Human Rights as Defendant I, and the Notary as Defendant II.
Responsibilites of Instrumental Witnesses In The Preparation of Notarial Deeds Containing Defects Ius Budiasto, Luthfi; Sentot Sudarwanto, Albertus; Purwadi, Hari
International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences Vol. 6 No. 4 (2025): August 2025 ( Indonesia - Zimbabwe )
Publisher : CV. Inara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51601/ijersc.v6i4.991

Abstract

A notary deed serves as an authentic piece of evidence in a legal relationship, which requires the presence of not only a notary but also an instrumental witness. The existence of instrumental witnesses is a condition for the validity of a deed, because a deed without instrumental witnesses will lose its authenticity. However, when a deed contains formal or material defects, questions arise as to the extent of the responsibility imposed on the witnesses. This study uses normative legal research methods with a statutory approach, examining the Law on Notary Positions (UUJN), the Civil Code, and relevant doctrines. This study aims to analyze the legal responsibility of instrumental witnesses in making notary deeds containing defects. This research is a normative legal research with a legislative approach. The analysis was carried out using the theory of legal responsibility and the theory of legal protection as the basis for argument. The results of the study show that the responsibilities of instrumental witnesses should be limited to formal aspects, such as attendance and deed signing. Therefore, a renewal of the notarial law is needed that explicitly regulates the limits of responsibility.
Co-Authors Hari Purwadi, Hari Ius Budiasto, Luthfi Ivana Wulandari Santi Susanti, Santi Tuhana Tuhana Waringga Y., Stefanie