Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

THE SANCTION FORMULATION IN CORRUPTION CRIME DUE TO INDONESIAN CRIMINAL LAW SYSTEM TO REALIZE THE PUNISHMENT GOALS Sudarti, Elly; L, Sahuri
Ganesha Law Review Vol 1 No 2 (2019): November
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Jurusan Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan, Fakultas Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The Formulation of Criminal Sanctions holds a strategic position in an effort to decrease corruption crime. Until now, the application of criminal sanctions in Indonesia has not provided a direction for the occurrence of a significant decrease in corruption. This can be seen from the issued by Transparency International 2017 about the ranking of the most corrupt countries in the world, where Indonesia still in the 5thranks in ASEAN. This research purposes to analyze and to formulate the harmony in the formulation of criminal sanctions for corruption, with the goal of Indonesian criminalizing law system so that the ultimate goal is suppressing the level of corruption in Indonesia can be achieved. This study is used the statute, conceptual and case approach as a method to analyze the legal substances and the results of this research had been shown, there are several weaknesses in the criminal punishment system according to The Act Number 31 on 1999 andThe Act Number 20 on 2001; where, the system of corruption criminalizing is complicated that make the punishment for corruption cannot reach the goal of punishment. For the better law system in the future, it is more appropriate criminal sanctions needed to be formulated, so that the purpose of criminal penalties for corruption can be achieved, used by conducting a plea bargaining in the beginning, that the perpetrator must return state losses and pay fines but still be found guilty through the determination of the judge.
Formulasi Tindak Pidana Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik Di Indonesia Pasca Putusan MK Nomor 105/PUU-XXII/2024 Aji, Galuh Bastoro; L, Sahuri; Rahayu, Sri; Sudarti, Elly; Putra, Akbar Kurnia
RIO LAW JURNAL Vol 6, No 2 (2025): Rio Law Jurnal
Publisher : Universitas Muara Bungo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36355/rlj.v6i2.1904

Abstract

Abstrak Eksistensi formulasi tindak pidana informasi dan transaksi elektronik di Indonesia yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik, Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik, dan Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 Tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik, telah sering dilakukan judicial review kepada Mahkamah Konstitusi. Dominasi pokok perkara judicial review adalah tentang kebebasan berpendapat seperti pasal pencemaran nama baik dan ujaran kebencian. Padahal, kebebasan berpendapat merupakan salah satu hak paling mendasar dalam kehidupan bernegara yang secara konstitusional diakui eksistensinya. Oleh karena itu, Majelis Hakim MK melalui Putusan MK Nomor 105/PUU-XXII/2024, menganulir salah satu unsur di dalam beberapa pasal yang berpotensi disalahgunakan untuk mengkriminalisasi kebebasan berpendapat di ruang digital. Kata Kunci:         Tindak Pidana, Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik, Pasca Putusan MK Nomor 105/PUU-XXII/2024