Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.325
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal AL-IDARAH: JURNAL KEPENDIDIKAN ISLAM Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN JURNAL PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM INDONESIA An-Nidhom : Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam Sinergi International Journal of Law Legalis : Journal of Law Review
Suryana, Atang
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN

 1 
Can Electronic Evidence Constitute Sufficient Grounds for Criminal Liability? Suryana, Atang; Sakmaf, Marius Suprianto
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 7 No 1 (2025): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v7i1.323

Abstract

The advancement of information technology has triggered a paradigm shift in the evidentiary system of criminal law, particularly concerning the legality and authenticity of electronic evidence. This study seeks to examine the legal standing of electronic evidence within the Indonesian criminal procedure framework, assess the impact of Constitutional Court Decision No. 20/PUU-XIV/2016, and evaluate the admissibility of such evidence in light of evidentiary principles and the role of digital forensics. Employing a normative juridical approach, the analysis is based on statutory regulations, judicial decisions, and relevant legal scholarship. The findings reveal that while electronic evidence has been formally acknowledged through the Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE) Law and reinforced by the Constitutional Court’s decision, significant challenges persist in both its technical implementation and legal admissibility in court proceedings. Digital forensics plays a critical role in safeguarding the integrity and reliability of electronic evidence. The study concludes that reforming the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code and developing standardized digital evidence protocols are essential to ensuring justice and legal certainty.
Can Electronic Evidence Constitute Sufficient Grounds for Criminal Liability? Suryana, Atang; Sakmaf, Marius Suprianto
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 7 No 1 (2025): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v7i1.323

Abstract

The advancement of information technology has triggered a paradigm shift in the evidentiary system of criminal law, particularly concerning the legality and authenticity of electronic evidence. This study seeks to examine the legal standing of electronic evidence within the Indonesian criminal procedure framework, assess the impact of Constitutional Court Decision No. 20/PUU-XIV/2016, and evaluate the admissibility of such evidence in light of evidentiary principles and the role of digital forensics. Employing a normative juridical approach, the analysis is based on statutory regulations, judicial decisions, and relevant legal scholarship. The findings reveal that while electronic evidence has been formally acknowledged through the Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE) Law and reinforced by the Constitutional Court’s decision, significant challenges persist in both its technical implementation and legal admissibility in court proceedings. Digital forensics plays a critical role in safeguarding the integrity and reliability of electronic evidence. The study concludes that reforming the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code and developing standardized digital evidence protocols are essential to ensuring justice and legal certainty.
Co-Authors Alfrida, Alfrida Hasyim Ardani, Mira Novana Kassi, Yuliance Mabruroh, Mabruroh Paidi, Zulhilmi bin Sakmaf, Marius Suprianto Sasea, Enny Martha Suryapermana, Nana Taqillah, Liseu