Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Strengthening the Role of Experts in Supporting the Effectiveness of Functions in the Regional House of Representatives Muhtar, Muhtar; Nur, Rismawati
Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Publik Vol 15, No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26858/jiap.v15i1.72472

Abstract

The Regional House of Representatives (DPRD) plays a strategic role in safeguarding local democracy through the implementation of legislative, budgeting and supervisory functions. However, reality shows that the effectiveness of the implementation of official functions is often constrained by the limited technical and substantive capacity of council members. In this context, the existence of experts becomes a vital instrument as a provider of scientific and technocratic support. This study aims to analyze the strategic role of DPRD experts in supporting the implementation of official functions and formulate strategies to optimize their utilization. Using a juridical-normative approach, the results show that the existence of experts has not been institutionalized optimally due to three main problems, namely a recruitment system that is not based on meritocracy, a lack of professional capacity building schemes, and a weak institutional framework that systematically regulates their duties and functions. In an effort to strengthen the role of DPRD experts, the reformulation of recruitment policies, the preparation of competency standards, and the establishment of expert management units under the DPRD Secretariat are key strategies to ensure the professionalism and substantive contribution of experts to the implementation of official functions. With adequate regulative and institutional strengthening, experts can act as a strategic partner to improve the quality of legislation and accountability of local government.
The Application of Civil Forfeiture as a Restorative Mechanism in Returning State Financial Losses due to Corruption Crime Nur, Rismawati; Novemyanto, Alfin Dwi; Ridlo, Muhammad Rosyid
Jurnal Kebijakan Publik Vol 16, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31258/jkp.v16i2.8806

Abstract

Corruption crimes not only result in massive state financial losses but also create inequality of justice and weaken the effectiveness of the legal system. The recovery of state losses has so far relied on a criminal approach that is repressive and limited to court decisions, so that it is unable to reach conditions when the perpetrator escapes, dies, or cannot be brought to trial. This article examines the application of civil forfeiture as a restorative mechanism oriented towards direct asset recovery without requiring proof of criminal guilt. Through a normative juridical research method with statutory, conceptual, and comparative legal approaches, this research analyzes the practice of non-conviction-based asset forfeiture in civil law countries such as France as well as common law countries such as the United States and the United Kingdom. The results of the analysis show that the civil forfeiture mechanism is in line with the principles of restorative justice and can be applied in Indonesia through regulatory reforms that guarantee legal certainty and protection of human rights. The application of an in rem- based asset forfeiture scheme with limited reversal of the burden of proof is considered capable of accelerating the return of state losses while strengthening the eradication of corruption in a sustainable manner.
Reconstructing Presidential Legislative Authority: Analyzing the System and Strengthening Modern Democracy Nur, Rismawati
Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum VOLUME 10 ISSUE 1 OCTOBER 2025
Publisher : PDIH Untag Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/jidh.v0i0.5940

Abstract

This study aims to reconstruct the President’s legislative authority within Indonesia’sconstitutional framework by reformulating Article 20 of the 1945 Constitution toalign with the principles of modern presidentialism. The research employs a normativejuridical method using conceptual, statutory, and comparative constitutionalapproaches. Comparative analyses are conducted with the presidential systems of theUnited States and Brazil to identify an institutional design that ensures an effectiveseparation of powers and strengthens checks and balances. The findings indicate thatlimiting the President’s legislative authority by transferring deliberative functionsentirely to the House of Representatives, while maintaining the President’s role inbudget initiation and administrative assent, establishes a more accountable andbalanced governance system. This model enhances public participation, ensureslegislative transparency, and reinforces democratic legitimacy through the absolutemajority voting principle and automatic approval mechanism. The study suggests thatconstitutional amendments should clearly separate executive and legislative powersand institutionalize public involvement in lawmaking to prevent executive dominance.Strengthening legislative independence through these reforms will promote a moreparticipatory and responsive democratic system consistent with the rule of law and theprinciples of modern constitutional democracy.
Rekognisi Status dan Perlindungan Hukum Pekerja Gig Economy: Tinjauan Tuntutan Kolektif Pengemudi Ojek Online di Indonesia Novemyanto, Alfin Dwi; Nur, Rismawati
JURNAL HUKUM PELITA Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Pelita Mei 2025
Publisher : Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengabdian (DPPM) Universitas Pelita Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37366/jhp.v6i1.5789

Abstract

Digital transformation has created new forms of employment within the framework of the gig economy, one of which is online motorcycle taxi drivers (ojol). Despite their importance, these drivers lack defined legal status. As a result, they don’t receive labor protection equivalent to that of formal workers. This legal uncertainty has triggered various collective demands, including the provision of religious holiday allowances (THR), regulation of minimum fares, commission limits, and access to social security. This study aims to analyze the urgency of legal recognition for gig economy workers, identify forms of maladministration in the governance of digital labor, and propose regulatory reforms to strengthen legal protection for ojol drivers. The research used normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches. The results showed that partnership status unilaterally constructed by platforms creates a pseudo-partnership that contradicts the principles of worker protection. The state is considered negligent in regulating fare systems, supervising commissions, and providing adaptive legal protection. Therefore, regulation through specific legislation (lex specialis), judicial review of exclusive norms, and the application of soft law in the digital transport sector are necessary. Recognizing gig economy workers as legal subjects is essential for creating an inclusive, fair, constitutional labor system