Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Strengthening the Role of Experts in Supporting the Effectiveness of Functions in the Regional House of Representatives Muhtar, Muhtar; Nur, Rismawati
Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Publik Vol 15, No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26858/jiap.v15i1.72472

Abstract

The Regional House of Representatives (DPRD) plays a strategic role in safeguarding local democracy through the implementation of legislative, budgeting and supervisory functions. However, reality shows that the effectiveness of the implementation of official functions is often constrained by the limited technical and substantive capacity of council members. In this context, the existence of experts becomes a vital instrument as a provider of scientific and technocratic support. This study aims to analyze the strategic role of DPRD experts in supporting the implementation of official functions and formulate strategies to optimize their utilization. Using a juridical-normative approach, the results show that the existence of experts has not been institutionalized optimally due to three main problems, namely a recruitment system that is not based on meritocracy, a lack of professional capacity building schemes, and a weak institutional framework that systematically regulates their duties and functions. In an effort to strengthen the role of DPRD experts, the reformulation of recruitment policies, the preparation of competency standards, and the establishment of expert management units under the DPRD Secretariat are key strategies to ensure the professionalism and substantive contribution of experts to the implementation of official functions. With adequate regulative and institutional strengthening, experts can act as a strategic partner to improve the quality of legislation and accountability of local government.
Rekognisi Status dan Perlindungan Hukum Pekerja Gig Economy: Tinjauan Tuntutan Kolektif Pengemudi Ojek Online di Indonesia Novemyanto, Alfin Dwi; Nur, Rismawati
JURNAL HUKUM PELITA Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Pelita Mei 2025
Publisher : Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengabdian (DPPM) Universitas Pelita Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37366/jhp.v6i1.5789

Abstract

Digital transformation has created new forms of employment within the framework of the gig economy, one of which is online motorcycle taxi drivers (ojol). Despite their importance, these drivers lack defined legal status. As a result, they don’t receive labor protection equivalent to that of formal workers. This legal uncertainty has triggered various collective demands, including the provision of religious holiday allowances (THR), regulation of minimum fares, commission limits, and access to social security. This study aims to analyze the urgency of legal recognition for gig economy workers, identify forms of maladministration in the governance of digital labor, and propose regulatory reforms to strengthen legal protection for ojol drivers. The research used normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches. The results showed that partnership status unilaterally constructed by platforms creates a pseudo-partnership that contradicts the principles of worker protection. The state is considered negligent in regulating fare systems, supervising commissions, and providing adaptive legal protection. Therefore, regulation through specific legislation (lex specialis), judicial review of exclusive norms, and the application of soft law in the digital transport sector are necessary. Recognizing gig economy workers as legal subjects is essential for creating an inclusive, fair, constitutional labor system
Reforming the Regulatory Impact Assessment to Restore Regulatory Rationality in Indonesia’s Fast-Track Legislation Novemyanto, Alfin Dwi; Nur, Rismawati; Ridlo, Muhammad Rosyid
Jurnal Pemerintahan dan Politik Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Indo Global Mandiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36982/jpp.v11i1.6136

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to analyze the failure of implementing the Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) in maintaining regulatory rationality within Indonesia’s fast-track legislation practices and to formulate a reform model grounded in Max Weber’s theory of rational-legal authority and the principles of good regulatory governance. Methodology: This research employs a normative juridical method using conceptual and statutory approaches. Legal materials were collected through library research and analyzed qualitatively using rational-legal reasoning to evaluate the effectiveness of the RIA mechanism in ensuring the quality of lawmaking processes. Findings: The study finds that RIA has not been substantively implemented in Indonesia’s fast-track legislative process, resulting in a shift from legal rationality to pragmatic political rationality. This condition has weakened legal legitimacy, caused policy overlaps, and eroded public trust in legislative institutions. The lack of public participation, transparency, and evidence-based analysis is identified as the main factor behind the ineffective implementation of RIA. Practical implications: The findings highlight the urgency of adaptive RIA reform through strengthened inter-agency coordination, the adoption of an open regulatory data system, and the establishment of an independent regulatory evaluation body. This model can serve as a practical framework for policymakers to ensure rational, transparent, and accountable legislative processes. Originality/value: This study offers an original contribution by integrating Weberian legal rationality theory into the reform design of RIA in Indonesia. It presents a novel conceptual framework for reinforcing legal legitimacy and regulatory quality through the institutionalization of RIA as a mechanism of rational-legal authority in a modern Rechtsstaat.