Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

An Analysis Of Marriage Guardianship Provisions In Somalia And Indonesia: A Comparative Study Of Somalia Family Law And Indonesian Islamic Law Azmi, Lalu Miptahul; Ghazali, Muhammad Said; Prihartini, Arina Amalia; Ghazali, Ahmad Alimuddin
Syntax Literate Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Syntax Corporation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36418/syntax-literate.v7i12.15279

Abstract

Indonesia and Somalia are both categorized as nations with a predominant Muslim population following to the Shafi'i Madhab (school of thought). However, despite this similarity, there are notable distinctions in the Islamic family law rules and their enforcement between the two countries. An important distinction is in the divergence of marriage guardianship regulations between Indonesia and Somalia. In Indonesia, marriage guardians are mandatory and considered an essential component of the marriage process, whereas in Somalia, the opposite is genuine. In Somalia, a marriage guardian is not mandatory for marriage. This comparative phenomenon is quite distinctive and warrants further in-depth study. Despite both countries are followers of the Shafi'i school of thought in Islam, their respective applications of Islamic Family Law differ significantly. This study employs the library research method, specifically utilizing a Normative Juridical approach. Ultimately, the variations in marriage guardian legislation between these two nations can be attributed to socio-historical disparities and devotion to different schools of belief by their respective populations. In Indonesia, guardianship law follows the Syafii school of thought, which is in line with the beliefs of the majority of the population. Conversely, Somalia's law is based on the Hanafi school of thought, which emphasizes gender equality and justice in all legislation.
Hak-Hak Perempuan Pascaperceraian (Studi Komparatif Negara Indonesia, Malaysia) Khairi, Muazzam; Mutawali, Mutawali; Ghazali, Muhammad Said
Empiricism Journal Vol. 7 No. 1: March 2026
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (LITPAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36312/npn7zg05

Abstract

Perceraian tidak hanya berimplikasi pada putusnya hubungan perkawinan, tetapi juga menimbulkan persoalan serius terkait pemenuhan hak-hak perempuan dan anak pascaperceraian. Dalam praktiknya, masih terdapat kesenjangan antara norma hukum dan implementasi pemenuhan hak perempuan, khususnya dalam aspek nafkah pascaperceraian, hak asuh anak, dan pembagian harta bersama. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis secara komparatif pengaturan dan pelaksanaan hak-hak perempuan pascaperceraian di Indonesia dan Malaysia, dengan menyoroti perbedaan sistem hukum serta tantangan implementatif yang dihadapi di kedua negara. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan perbandingan hukum, melalui kajian terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan, putusan pengadilan, dan literatur hukum keluarga Islam. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa di Indonesia, pemenuhan hak perempuan pascaperceraian diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI), namun masih menghadapi kendala dalam aspek eksekusi putusan, khususnya terkait nafkah dan hak ekonomi perempuan. Sementara itu, Malaysia memiliki mekanisme penegakan yang relatif lebih tegas dan terstruktur melalui Mahkamah Syariah, meskipun tetap menghadapi tantangan sosial dan administratif. Women's Rights After Divorce (Comparative Study of Indonesia and Malaysia) Abstract Divorce not only results in the dissolution of a marriage but also raises serious issues related to the fulfillment of women's and children's rights after the divorce. In practice, there is still a gap between legal norms and the implementation of women's rights, particularly regarding post-divorce support, child custody, and the division of joint property. This article aims to comparatively analyze the regulation and implementation of women's rights after divorce in Indonesia and Malaysia, highlighting the differences in legal systems and the implementation challenges faced in both countries. This research uses a normative juridical method with a statutory and comparative legal approach, through a review of legislation, court decisions, and Islamic family law literature. The results show that in Indonesia, the fulfillment of women's rights after divorce is regulated by Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage and the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), but still faces obstacles in the implementation of decisions, particularly regarding support and women's economic rights. Meanwhile, Malaysia has a relatively firmer and more structured enforcement mechanism through the Sharia Court, although it still faces social and administrative challenges.