Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.925
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Lex Librum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Bengkoelen Justice : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Hukum Sehasen Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Jurnal Karya Nyata Pengabdian Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Royani, Ferawati
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Analisis Perlindungan Bagi Konsumen Dalam Transaksi Digital Menggunakan Transaksi Digital cryptocurrency bitcoin Lendrawati, Nessa; Hermana, M.Arafat; Royani, Ferawati
JURNAL HUKUM SEHASEN Vol 12 No 1 (2026): April
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Dehasen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37676/jhs.v12i2.10812

Abstract

The development of digital technology has given rise to cryptocurrency as a new investment instrument. In Indonesia, cryptocurrency is not recognized as a legal means of payment but is classified as a commodity supervised by the Badan Pengawas Perdagangan Berjangka Komoditi (BAPPEBTI), which raises legal issues related to consumer protection in volatile and high-risk transactions.mThis study aims to analyze the legal position of consumers, the forms of legal protection available, and the roles of business actors and supervisory authorities using a normative legal research method. The findings show that consumer protection for crypto assets has not been specifically regulated and still relies on general regulations. Bank Indonesia prohibits the use of cryptocurrency as a means of payment, while BAPPEBTI supervises its trading as a commodity. However, supervision and dispute resolution mechanisms remain limited, resulting in suboptimal legal certainty for consumers.
Legal Analysis Of The Validity Of Siri Marriages According To Law Number 1 Of 1974 Concerning Marriage Sartika, Pujja Dwi; Royani, Ferawati; Aprianto, Sandi
JURNAL HUKUM SEHASEN Vol 12 No 1 (2026): April
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Dehasen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37676/jhs.v12i2.10815

Abstract

Marriage is a legal event that gives rise to broad civil legal consequences, both for husband, wife, and children. In the Indonesian legal system, the validity of marriage is regulated by Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, which requires the fulfillment of religious provisions and the obligation of registration by the state. However, in practice, many people still conduct unregistered marriages, namely marriages that are valid according to religious law but are not administratively registered. This phenomenon creates legal problems because it creates a dualism between religious validity and state legal legality. This study aims to analyze the legal provisions regarding the validity of marriage according to Law Number 1 of 1974 and examine the legal position of unregistered marriages from the perspective of positive law and other related laws and regulations. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory and conceptual approach, by examining primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The research results show that unregistered marriages, although valid according to religion, lack legal force under positive law because they do not meet the formal requirements for registration as stipulated in Article 2 paragraph (2) of Law Number 1 of 1974. The legal consequences of unregistered marriages weaken legal protection for wives and children, particularly regarding the rights to maintenance, inheritance, child status, and joint property. The state provides a marriage confirmation mechanism as a repressive legal protection measure, but this mechanism is limited and is not intended to legalize unregistered marriages. Therefore, marriage registration is an important instrument in achieving legal certainty and protecting civil rights within the national marriage law system.
Synchronization Of Authority To Eradicate Criminal Acts Of Corruption According To Law 31 Of 1999 Concerning The Eradication Of Criminal Acts Of Corruption Handled By The Corruption Eradication Committee (KPK), The Prosecutor's Office, And The Republic O Manurung, Mona Fidelia; Hermana, M. Arafat; Royani, Ferawati
JURNAL HUKUM SEHASEN Vol 12 No 1 (2026): April
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Dehasen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37676/jhs.v12i2.10816

Abstract

Corruption is a systemic problem that has become deeply rooted in Indonesia's national life, with multidimensional impacts that harm state finances, undermine democracy, and hinder development. Efforts to eradicate corruption are carried out by three law enforcement institutions: the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia, and the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia, each with authority based on statutory regulations. This study aims to analyze the synchronization of the authority of these three institutions in implementing corruption eradication in accordance with Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes (as amended) and to evaluate the impact of Law Number 19 of 2019 on their performance. The research method used is normative legal research with statutory, case, and historical approaches, as well as qualitative analysis of secondary data in the form of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results show that normatively, regulations on corruption eradication are coherent, applying the principle of lex specialis derogat legi generali. The KPK has special authority to handle corruption cases involving law enforcement officials or state administrators, cases that receive public attention, and/or those involving state losses of at least IDR 1 billion. Meanwhile, the Attorney General's Office and the National Police handle corruption cases that do not meet these qualifications, with the Attorney General's Office responsible for investigation and prosecution, and the National Police tasked with inquiry and investigation. However, in practice, there is a lack of synchronization marked by overlapping authority, differences in interpretation of regulations, and horizontal conflicts between institutions. The existence of limiting boundaries regarding the authority of each institution (National Police, Attorney General's Office, and KPK) in handling corruption crimes is intended to ensure that relations between law enforcement institutions do not lead to monopolization or overstepping of each other's duties.
Co-Authors Aprianto, Sandi Asnawati Asnawati Dewi, Sari Putri Hermana, M. Arafat Hermana, M.Arafat Hidayatullah, Cici Hurairah Hurairah, Hurairah Jaya, Dwi Putra Jaya, Jeki Putra Lendrawati, Nessa Lubis, Anwar Fuadi Majesti, Velly Manurung, Mona Fidelia Perdima, Feby Elra Prabowo, Triyogi Rasta, Soni Sartika, Pujja Dwi Silviani, Yessi Suaka, Mardhatilla Syaipullah, Ramadhan Timur, Widya Wilson Wilson