Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

MEDIASI NON LITIGASI TERHADAP SENGKETA PEMBAGIAN HARTA WARISAN DI KECAMATAN MOUTONG KABUPATEN PARIGI MOUTONG PROVINSI SULAWESI TENGAH Ranny Apriani Nusa; Sitti Marwah; Shera Yunita
Qiyas : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Peradilan Vol 6, No 1 (2021): APRIL
Publisher : IAIN Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/qys.v6i1.4344

Abstract

Abstrak : Di Indonesia mediasi non litigasi (Alternative Dispute Resolution) telah diatur dalam pasal 1 ayat 10 Undang-undang nomor 30 tahun 1999. Prinsip win-win solution masih menjadi magnet utama masyarakat Indonesia memilih penyelesaian jalur non litigasi. Seperti halnya di kecamatan Moutong,yang mana sebagian besar masyarakatnya beragama Islam dan lebih memilih menyelesaikan sengketa kewarisannya melalui jalur mediasi non litigasi. Artikel ini mencoba menelusuri faktor-faktor yang melatarbelakangi alasan masyarakat Moutong memilih menyelesaikan sengketa mereka di Kantor Kecamatan, serta bagaimana proses dan mekanisme penyelesaiannya, dan bagaimana kekuatan hukumnya. Dengan menggunakan penelitian kualitatif, tulisan ini mencoba mendeskripsikan upaya mediasi non litigasi terhadap sengketa waris Islam di kecamatan Moutong, yang subyek penelitiannya merupakan pejabat kecamatan yang berperan sebagai mediator dalam sengketa waris Islam. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa faktor ekonomi dan geografis merupakan faktor terbesar yang menjadi pertimbangan masyarakat kecamatan Moutong lebih memilih menyelesaikan sengketanya dengan jalur non litigasi. Adapun sengketa waris Islam di kecamatan Moutong memiliki mekanisme tertentu yang harus ditempuh para pihak, kemudian dalam prosesnya mediator pada umumnya berpedoman pada Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Jika diperlukan, mediator setempat juga dibantu oleh praktisi hukum seperti jaksa atau kuasa hukum. Setelah proses perdamaian, kedua pihak mendapatkan Berita Acara Kesepakatan yang mengikat secara hukum dan surat wajib pajak (jika diperlukan).Kata Kunci: Mediasi non litigasi, Pembagian Harta Warisan, Kecamatan Moutong. Abstract: In Indonesia, non-litigation mediation (Alternative Dispute Resolution) has been regulated in article 1 paragraph 10 of Law number 30 of 1999. The principle of win-win solutions is still the main magnet for Indonesians to choose non-litigation solutions. Such is the case in Moutong sub-district, where most of the people are Muslim and prefer to resolve inheritance disputes through non-litigation mediation. This article tries to explore the factors behind the reasons for the Moutong community to choose to resolve their disputes at the District Office, as well as how the process and resolution mechanism are, and what is the legal force. By using qualitative research, this paper attempts to describe non-litigation mediation efforts on Islamic inheritance disputes in Moutong sub-district, where research subjects are sub-district officials who act as mediators in Islamic inheritance disputes. The results showed that economic and geographical factors were the biggest factors that were considered by the people of Moutong sub-district who preferred to settle their disputes by means of non-litigation. The Islamic inheritance dispute in Moutong sub-district has a certain mechanism that must be followed by the parties, then in the process the mediator generally refers to the Compilation of Islamic Law. If needed, the local mediator is also assisted by a legal practitioner such as a prosecutor or attorney. After the agreement process, both parties receive a legally binding Minutes of Agreement and a tax document (if required).Keywords: Non-litigation Mediation, Distribution of Inheritance, District Moutong.
MEDIASI NON LITIGASI TERHADAP SENGKETA PEMBAGIAN HARTA WARISAN DI KECAMATAN MOUTONG KABUPATEN PARIGI MOUTONG PROVINSI SULAWESI TENGAH Ranny Apriani Nusa; Sitti Marwah; Shera Yunita
Qiyas : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Peradilan Vol 6, No 1 (2021): APRIL
Publisher : IAIN Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/qys.v6i1.4344

Abstract

Abstrak : Di Indonesia mediasi non litigasi (Alternative Dispute Resolution) telah diatur dalam pasal 1 ayat 10 Undang-undang nomor 30 tahun 1999. Prinsip win-win solution masih menjadi magnet utama masyarakat Indonesia memilih penyelesaian jalur non litigasi. Seperti halnya di kecamatan Moutong,yang mana sebagian besar masyarakatnya beragama Islam dan lebih memilih menyelesaikan sengketa kewarisannya melalui jalur mediasi non litigasi. Artikel ini mencoba menelusuri faktor-faktor yang melatarbelakangi alasan masyarakat Moutong memilih menyelesaikan sengketa mereka di Kantor Kecamatan, serta bagaimana proses dan mekanisme penyelesaiannya, dan bagaimana kekuatan hukumnya. Dengan menggunakan penelitian kualitatif, tulisan ini mencoba mendeskripsikan upaya mediasi non litigasi terhadap sengketa waris Islam di kecamatan Moutong, yang subyek penelitiannya merupakan pejabat kecamatan yang berperan sebagai mediator dalam sengketa waris Islam. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa faktor ekonomi dan geografis merupakan faktor terbesar yang menjadi pertimbangan masyarakat kecamatan Moutong lebih memilih menyelesaikan sengketanya dengan jalur non litigasi. Adapun sengketa waris Islam di kecamatan Moutong memiliki mekanisme tertentu yang harus ditempuh para pihak, kemudian dalam prosesnya mediator pada umumnya berpedoman pada Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Jika diperlukan, mediator setempat juga dibantu oleh praktisi hukum seperti jaksa atau kuasa hukum. Setelah proses perdamaian, kedua pihak mendapatkan Berita Acara Kesepakatan yang mengikat secara hukum dan surat wajib pajak (jika diperlukan).Kata Kunci: Mediasi non litigasi, Pembagian Harta Warisan, Kecamatan Moutong. Abstract: In Indonesia, non-litigation mediation (Alternative Dispute Resolution) has been regulated in article 1 paragraph 10 of Law number 30 of 1999. The principle of win-win solutions is still the main magnet for Indonesians to choose non-litigation solutions. Such is the case in Moutong sub-district, where most of the people are Muslim and prefer to resolve inheritance disputes through non-litigation mediation. This article tries to explore the factors behind the reasons for the Moutong community to choose to resolve their disputes at the District Office, as well as how the process and resolution mechanism are, and what is the legal force. By using qualitative research, this paper attempts to describe non-litigation mediation efforts on Islamic inheritance disputes in Moutong sub-district, where research subjects are sub-district officials who act as mediators in Islamic inheritance disputes. The results showed that economic and geographical factors were the biggest factors that were considered by the people of Moutong sub-district who preferred to settle their disputes by means of non-litigation. The Islamic inheritance dispute in Moutong sub-district has a certain mechanism that must be followed by the parties, then in the process the mediator generally refers to the Compilation of Islamic Law. If needed, the local mediator is also assisted by a legal practitioner such as a prosecutor or attorney. After the agreement process, both parties receive a legally binding Minutes of Agreement and a tax document (if required).Keywords: Non-litigation Mediation, Distribution of Inheritance, District Moutong.
RESILIENSI KELUARGA MUSLIM DI MASA WABAH COVID-19: TINJAUAN PERAN DAN FUNGSI SUAMI ISTRI Nusa, Ranny Apriani
Sahaja: Journal Sharia and Humanities Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): Sahaja: Journal Sharia and Humanities
Publisher : Universitas Darunnajah Jakarta, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61159/sahaja.v1i2.20

Abstract

The Coronavirus Outbreak (COVID-19) is a crisis in the health sector that has a very significant impact on all levels of society. Economic, political, social, cultural, religious impacts and other aspects are felt by all people around the world because of this epidemic. in their distribution figures, all countries around the world make policies, advice to stay at home, do work from home, learn from home (learn from home), and so on. All of this is done so that people can avoid crowds and keep maintaining their distance (physical distance). In this study, the authors will discuss efforts to resilience (resilience) Muslim families whose research subjects are married couples. What are their roles and functions in maintaining family resilience during the Covid-19 outbreak, and so on. This research is a field research. The subject is a married couple in Bukit Mutiara Jaya Housing, Tembalang, Semarang. The investigation concluded that there are several new roles that a husband must play in family resilience, namely maintaining high-quality communication with the family, for example by holding meetings after each dinner together or in religious matters holding a new routine such as a cult after each dawn prayer, so that when he is worshiping from home, orders of morals are easy to carry out. Similar to a mother who previously served as a wife and a housewife, in the wabahc, she has increasingly become a “teacher at home” who participates and is proactive in guiding her child virtually. The functions that must be carried out by a married couple to support family resilience during the Covid-19 wabahc include the function of spirituality, the function of economic resilience, the function of communication, and the function of education.
Analisis Konsep Arnstein’s Ladder Of Participation Dalam Mega Proyek Ibu Kota Nusantara Nusa, Ranny Apriani; Firda Annisa
urn:multiple://2988-7828multiple.v3i39
Publisher : Institute of Educational, Research, and Community Service

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Mega Proyek Ibu Kota Negara (IKN) Indonesia merupakan salah satu proyek strategis nasional yang melibatkan berbagai pihak, termasuk pemerintah, masyarakat, dan pemangku kepentingan lainnya. Dalam konteks partisipasi publik, konsep Arnstein’s Ladder of Participation menjadi kerangka analisis yang relevan untuk menilai tingkat keterlibatan masyarakat dalam pengambilan keputusan proyek ini. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis sejauh mana partisipasi masyarakat telah diterapkan dalam proyek IKN berdasarkan delapan tingkat partisipasi yang diusulkan oleh Arnstein, mulai dari manipulasi hingga kendali warga (citizen control). Metode penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan analisis dokumen kebijakan dan studi literatur. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa partisipasi masyarakat dalam proyek IKN cenderung berada pada tingkat partisipasi simbolis, seperti konsultasi dan informasi, dengan keterbatasan dalam pengaruh nyata terhadap keputusan strategis. Temuan ini mengindikasikan perlunya peningkatan keterlibatan aktif masyarakat untuk mencapai tingkat partisipasi yang lebih substansial sesuai dengan prinsip pembangunan berkelanjutan. Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan kontribusi bagi pengembangan kebijakan yang lebih inklusif dan partisipatif dalam proyek-proyek pembangunan di Indonesia.