Syafrinaldi, Rani Fadhila
Faculty Of Law, Universitas Islam Riau

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Trips Agreement Dan Standarisasi Hukum Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Industri Di Indonesia Rani Fadhila Syafrinaldi; David Hardiago
UIR Law Review Vol. 5 No. 1 (2021): UIR Law Review
Publisher : UIR Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25299/uirlrev.2021.vol5(1).6992

Abstract

Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Right Agreement 1995 (TRPS Agreement) is an international provision in the field of intellectual property rights protection that applies universally. Indonesia as a country of law, has all laws relating to the protection of intellectual property rights with reference to the TRIPS Agreement. The TRIPS Agreemnt formulation must also refer to the Paris Convention For the Protection of Industrial Property, 1883 which has been recognized as the legal basis for the protection of intellectual property rights globally. Protection of industrial assets consisting of Patents, Trademarks, Trade Secrets, Industrial designs, Protection of Plant Varieties and Layout Designs of Integrated Circuits must be carried out by the state towards the holders of the said industrial property rights
Bencana Alam Banjir Dan Tanah Lonsor Di Kabupaten Sentani Jayapura Dalam Prespektif Green Criminology David Hardiago; Rani Fadhila Syafrinaldi
UIR Law Review Vol. 5 No. 1 (2021): UIR Law Review
Publisher : UIR Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25299/uirlrev.2021.vol5(1).6998

Abstract

This article aims to analyze two main problems related to the connection between floods and landslides that occurred in Sentani Jayapura Regency with green criminology discipline as the main approach perspective. This paper also offer projection as a means of prevention of environmental damage that has an impact on the natural disaster. This research uses a multi-method research technique (triangular method), which combines more than one research technique or strategy to study one or several related phenomena. The conclusion, in general, consists of two main parts. First, the connection between flood and landslide natural disasters in Sentani Jayapura Regency with green criminology, lies in the scope of green criminology in relation to factors in factual incidents in the example cases raised. Second, the means of prevention as a projection offer, in outline it consists of several main points. First, restoring the forest area according to its function. Second, conduct a spatial review based on considerations of disaster risk reduction and develop an adaptation scheme at the point of flooding. Third, internalization of land rehabilitation programs in the upstream and middle watersheds (DAS), especially forest areas, into program indications for spatial planning. Fourth, internalization of the soil and water conservation program in the form of Water Drainage (SPA) in agricultural land and settlements to improve regulation so as to reduce the potential for landslides and water accumulation in a short time. Fifth, socialization to the public by providing an understanding of green criminology and the importance of environmental responsibility.
Artificial Intelligence, Innovation, and Copyright: Comparing Intellectual Property Law in Indonesia and South Korea Syafrinaldi, Syafrinaldi; Hyeonsoo, Kim; Syafrinaldi, Rani Fadhila; Hardiago, David
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): Advancing Justice, Rights, and Governance in a Digital and Decentralized World
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lslr.v8i2.1227

Abstract

The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping industries globally, raising critical questions about the intersection of technology, law, and innovation. In particular, AI's ability to autonomously generate creative works challenges traditional concepts of authorship, ownership, and intellectual property (IP) rights. As AI technologies continue to evolve, existing legal frameworks, particularly in the realm of copyright, struggle to keep pace. This issue is especially pronounced in countries like Indonesia, where traditional copyright laws fail to address the complexities introduced by AI-generated content. In contrast, South Korea has made notable strides in reforming its IP laws to accommodate technological advancements, offering a more adaptive approach to regulating AI-driven innovation. This study critically analyzes the adequacy of copyright regulations in Indonesia in the context of AI and compares them with South Korea's more progressive legal responses. The research addresses the urgent need for legal reform in Indonesia to ensure that its IP laws remain relevant in an era of rapid technological change. By examining the regulatory responses of both countries, this study highlights the potential risks and opportunities for innovation that arise from the current legal landscapes. The contribution of this research lies in its comparative approach, shedding light on how differing legal systems address the challenges posed by AI. Through this analysis, the study provides valuable insights into how Indonesia can evolve its copyright framework to foster innovation while protecting the rights of creators, offering a model for countries facing similar technological and legal challenges.
Enhancing External Oversight of Constitutional Judges: A Study on the Role of the Judicial Commission in Indonesia and South Korea Suparto, Suparto; Hyeonsoo, Kim; Hardiago, David; Syafrinaldi, Rani Fadhila
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): Contemporary Legal Challenges and Solutions in a Global Context
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lslr.v8i1.14140

Abstract

This study addresses the urgent need for enhanced external oversight of constitutional judges in Indonesia and South Korea, driven by increasing concerns over judicial integrity and accountability. Recent instances of judicial misconduct and rising public dissatisfaction highlight the necessity for effective mechanisms that ensure transparency and ethical conduct among judges. The research investigates the roles and effectiveness of the Judicial Commissions in both countries, providing critical insights into their operations and impacts on judicial oversight. By employing a comparative approach, the study reveals the strengths and weaknesses of each commission’s framework, focusing on ethical guidelines, disciplinary processes, and public engagement strategies. It identifies best practices that could be adapted or improved to enhance judicial oversight, thereby fostering greater public trust in the legal system. The findings indicate that while both commissions aim to uphold judicial integrity, their effectiveness is influenced by contextual factors such as political dynamics and public perception. Additionally, this study explores the implementation of external oversight for Constitutional Judges in Indonesia, particularly in light of the establishment of the Constitutional Court following the 1945 Constitution amendment. Given the court’s crucial role in upholding constitutionalism, the exclusion of constitutional judges from oversight mechanisms is untenable. The Judicial Commission emerges as the most suitable body for external supervision, yet prior legislative efforts to integrate constitutional judges under its purview have been invalidated by the Constitutional Court. To rectify this, the study recommends amending Article 24B paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution to explicitly include "Constitutional Judges." This amendment is essential to ensure that all judges, including constitutional judges, are subject to the same level of external scrutiny. Ultimately, this research contributes to the broader discourse on judicial independence and accountability, offering actionable recommendations to strengthen oversight institutions and foster a more resilient judiciary in both Indonesia and South Korea.
Law and Digitalization: Cryptocurrency as Challenges Towards Indonesia's Criminal Law David Hardiago; Rani Fadhila Syafrinaldi; Syafrinaldi; M. Musa; Kim Hyeonsoo
Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Indonesia J. Crim. L. Studies (May, 2025)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijcls.v10i1.22557

Abstract

The advancement of science and technology continues to accelerate. Internet and its supporting technology became the backbone for many activities. This kind of advancement goes beyond territorial boundaries and human’s intelligence. This phenomenon triggers a new crime model. One of them is a crime related to the existence of Cryptocurrency such as money laundering, terrorism financing, and other forms of crime. This is understood given that Cryptocurrency give rise to large number of crimes as well as the emergence of a new modus operandi in several criminal acts. This is further supported by the lack of current Indonesian regulations that do not specifically accommodate the Cryptocurrency mechanism. The main issues raised in this study are related to how crimes and new modus operandi are caused by the Cryptocurrency mechanism against Indonesian criminal law, as well as how the mechanism of crime prevention and handling caused by the Cryptocurrency mechanism through the means of penal policy, covering targeted legislative amendments, specialised investigative units, prosecutorial guidelines, and asset-seizure procedures—to prevent and combat such crimes. This article uses normative method to answer the problem through comparative approach, case approach, literary approach and statutory approach. Initial hypotheses proposed to address these problems are: First, Cryptocurrency as a financial transaction mechanism that relies on the computational system with anonymous transactions opens a great opportunity for crime in the mechanism of the transaction. Second, the establishment of new rules in order prevent and combat crime and the modus operandi caused by the Cryptocurrency mechanism through the mechanism of penal policy are essential.