Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

WAJAH PROSEDURAL KEBIJAKAN PSBB JAKARTA TAHAP II BERBASIS SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS (SNA) Bahri, Mohammad Thoriq; Widhyharto, Derajad Sulistyo
Jurnal Kebijakan Publik Vol 12, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33578/jkp.12.1.p.1-10

Abstract

Pembatasan Sosial Berskala Besar (PSBB) untuk wilayah DKI Jakarta tahap II sudah dimulai pada tanggal 11 September 2020 yang lalu. Positivity rate sebesar 14,1 persen, dan peningkatan kasus diatas 1000 perhari menjadi dasar yang kuat. Peraturan Gubernur (Pergub) Nomor 88 Tahun 2020 terkait perubahan Pergub Nomor 33 Tahun 2020 tentang Pelaksanaan PSBB dalam Penanganan COVID-19 di DKI Jakarta mengamanatkan untuk berfokus pada penegakan Hukum. Penerapan PSBB Tahap II ini memacu banyak sekali pro dan kontra, terutama masyarakat yang terdampak. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode analisis Social Network Analysis (SNA), guna mengidentifikasi respon dan pola gerakan digital masyarakat Jakarta. Pengolahan big-data berupa 2129 tweets menggunakan Aplikasi Rstudio dan Phyton programming language, dapat disimpulkan bahwa 54 persen masyarakat mendukung, dan 46 persen kurang mendukung kebijakan tersebut. Analisa tanggapan emosi, terdapat 70 tweets berpadangan positif, 57 tweets percaya terhadap pemerintah, dan 56 tweets mengatisipasi dampak kebijakan, sisanya netral. Diketahui, opini publik terkait kebijakan PSBB dibentuk oleh akun media massa, dan akun pribadi tokoh masyarakat (pejabat publik, selebriti, aktivis, dan wartawan). PSBB Jakarta Tahap II menunjukkan bahwa adanya ketidakpastian pengelolaan resiko di tengah masyarakat bersifat mengikuti prosedur atau social conservative dan belum menyentuh sisi social substantive-nya. Selain itu, panoptisme sebagai unsur pengawasan merupakan kepanjangan tangan kekuasaan untuk mempertahankan struktur masyarakat dan persepsi penguasa terhadap resiko pada masyarakat yang bersifat konservatif dan prosedural pula, terlihat dari menonjolnya unsur penegakan hukum dalam penerapan kebijakan PSBB tahap II tersebut.
Understanding the Pattern of International Migration: Challenges in Human Rights Protection Bahri, Mohammad Thoriq
Jurnal Hukum Vol 38, No 2 (2022): Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Unissula

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jh.38.2.81-98

Abstract

International Migration can be described as the movement of people from one country to another county. The International Migration is one of the dynamic historical events, which was first legally regulated through the Tanzimat in the Ottoman Empire, signed on the 09 March 1857, which give the people who under the religious prosecuted legal permit to enter Turkey territory. Since then, the mass movement of the people between people becoming very common, especially after World War I, and World War II, when millions of people are moving from one region to another because of the displacement and violence. By utilizing Mixed Migration Center Dataset in 2019, which interviewed 9754 respondents, and the Mexican Government data on Migration in the year 2016, the main pattern of migration and motives are tracked and analyzed. It can be concluded, if the pattern of the migration is from East Africa to North Africa, East Africa to North Africa, East Africa to Southern Africa, East Africa to Europe, the Middle East to Europe, the Middle East to southeast Asia (Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand), Bangladesh/Myanmar to Malaysia, and from South America to North America. The motives are economics, Violence and General Security, and Lack of Rights. Still, International Migrants protection becoming a big challenge for many destination countries. From the analysis, can be concluded if the challenges in International Migrants Protection are because of the difference in terms, not all of the destination countries ratified the 1951 Convention about refugees and 1967 protocol as the legal basis and cultural and political context which make society in the destination countries refusing the International MigrantsInternational Migration can be described as the movement of people from one country to another county. The International Migration is one of the dynamic historical events, which was first legally regulated through the Tanzimat in the Ottoman Empire, signed on the 09 March 1857, which give the people who under the religious prosecuted legal permit to enter Turkey territory. Since then, the mass movement of the people between people becoming very common, especially after World War I, and World War II, when millions of people are moving from one region to another because of the displacement and violence. By utilizing Mixed Migration Center Dataset in 2019, which interviewed 9754 respondents, and the Mexican Government data on Migration in the year 2016, the main pattern of migration and motives are tracked and analyzed. It can be concluded, if the pattern of the migration is from East Africa to North Africa, East Africa to North Africa, East Africa to Southern Africa, East Africa to Europe, the Middle East to Europe, the Middle East to southeast Asia (Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand), Bangladesh/Myanmar to Malaysia, and from South America to North America. The motives are economics, Violence and General Security, and Lack of Rights. Still, International Migrants protection becoming a big challenge for many destination countries. From the analysis, can be concluded if the challenges in International Migrants Protection are because of the difference in terms, not all of the destination countries ratified the 1951 Convention about refugees and 1967 protocol as the legal basis and cultural and political context which make society in the destination countries refusing the International Migrants