Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Arena Hukum
Sudjati, Xaviera Qatrunnada Djana
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
General Principles of Good Governance in Administrative Court Decision Regarding Request for Review of Abuse of Authority Sudjati, Xaviera Qatrunnada Djana; Cahyandari, Dewi
Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Vol 21, No 3 (2021)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.jdh.2021.21.3.3070

Abstract

The administrative court is given the authority to review the request for review of abuse of authority according to the legislation and general principles of good governance as the two touchstones. This review may serve as a testing benchmark to discuss the issue of the request over the abuse of authority as requested by government officials, recalling that abuse of authority has several criteria to proscribe and regulate in the general principles of good governance. The research problems involved the criteria and the bases for determining the type of abuse of authority in the request over the abuse of authority. This research employed a normative method, statutory, and historical approaches. The research results concluded that the Decision 2/P/PW/2017/PTUN.JBI holds the relevance to the current legislation, public interest, and the absence of state losses, while the Decision 09/P/PW/2018/PTUN.Sby only refers to the current legislation in terms of its relevance. Although the general principles of good governance refer to the administrative court as the touchstone, this touchstone is not optimally used in the request for review of abuse of authority.Keywords:  AUPB (general principles of good governance); Administrative Court; request for review of abuse of authority.
Construction of Telemedicine Implementation License Arrangements Application Based in Indonesia Hadiyantina, Shinta; Supaat, Dina Imam; Sudjati, Xaviera Qatrunnada Djana; Rahmatika, Nur Auliya; Maharani, Tiara
Arena Hukum Vol. 17 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum2024.01702.10

Abstract

Health services have become more accessible than ever due to the rise of telemedicine. Among the most popular are application-based telemedicine services, especially those offered by tech companies specialising in teleconsultation. In Indonesia, users are particularly drawn to e-services that partner with healthcare providers, pharmaceutical services or maternity care providers. However, unlike Malaysia and Singapore, which have made significant strides in telemedicine for their communities, Indonesia still faces a legal gap in regulating, implementing, guiding and overseeing telemedicine services—especially those that are application-based and developed by tech companies. This study adopts a juridical-normative approach, analysing Indonesian laws and regulations and comparing them with those in Malaysia and Singapore. Using statutory, conceptual and comparative methods, the study aims to generate specific ideas for implementing regulations to govern the licensing of application-based telemedicine in Indonesia. The findings indicate that Indonesia lacks specific licensing regulations for telemedicine services developed by tech companies. More detailed regulations could be introduced through government regulations that align with the legal framework and ‘beleidsregel’ (policy rules), utilising the discretionary authority of administrative officials to address this regulatory gap. This approach aligns with the legal principle lex semper dabit remedium, meaning ‘the law always provides a remedy’, resonating with the spirit of progressive law in society.
Factual Actions as Objects of State Administrative Disputes in State Administrative Courts Following the Issuance of the Job Creation Law Cahyandari, Dewi; Ayub, Zainal Amin; Pratama, Luvieandra; Sudjati, Xaviera Qatrunnada Djana
Arena Hukum Vol. 17 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2024.01701.5

Abstract

The State Administrative Court Law currently in force presents contradictions, given that administrative activities represent one of its objects, which are inherently dynamic. This raises a significant question about whether the State Administrative Court Law, enacted in 1986, can still uphold its substantive principles. This study focuses on the discussion of factual actions. The Job Creation Law subsequently removed the determination of fictitious positive cases from the jurisdiction of the State Administrative Court. This study aims to describe, analyze, and disclose the fundamental meaning of factual actions as the objects of administrative disputes in the State Administrative Court. The study employs a normative method with legislative and philosophical approaches. The interpretation of factual actions as objects of administrative disputes in the State Administrative Court, following the issuance of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law No. 2 of 2022, requires that a request to a government official or body not addressed within the stipulated time frame is legally considered de facto granted. It is essential to consider the reality in the field, recognizing that the role of the State Administrative Court remains necessary to ensure legal certainty and protection for individuals or legal entities (Indonesian citizens) who submit requests for decisions to government officials or bodies.
Co-Authors Ayub, Zainal Amin Dewi Cahyandari, Dewi Pratama, Luvieandra Rahmatika, Nur Auliya Shinta Hadiyantina Supaat, Dina Imam Tiara Maharani, Tiara