Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jambe Law Journal JURNAL PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM INDONESIA Indonesian Journal of International Law
Abd Aziz, Saidatul Nadia
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Undelimited Maritime Areas: Obligations of States Under Article 74(3) and 83(3) of UNCLOS Basir, Salawati Mat; Abd Aziz, Saidatul Nadia
Indonesian Journal of International Law
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (482.801 KB)

Abstract

The delimitation of maritime areas between neighbors is of vital importance as it provides stable and long-lasting relations. Maritime boundary delimitation has been enriching the international law with a new chapter that has developed steadily in proportion with the related challenges and expectations. However, many maritime boundaries in the world are not delimited. This implies that disputes relating to maritime delimitation have many issues in future. In this case, State shall have to negotiate among them or to use dispute resolution mechanism. Under Article 74 and Article 83 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) provides for the delimitation of the territorial sea, the continental shelf and the economic exclusive zone. However, maritime delimitation disputes reveal that these provisions hardly occupy the central place they are expected to. This paper examines the issue of undelimited maritime areas where involved the Article 74(3) and Article 83(3) of UNCLOS and of vital importance in that it provides for stable and long-lasting relations among States.
De-centrality of ASEAN Law to Address US-China Rivalry in the South China Sea Basir, Salawati Mat; Abd Aziz, Saidatul Nadia
Indonesian Journal of International Law
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Evolving Southeast Asian geopolitics offer opportunities and risks. Central to the global East-West sea route of communication and rich in land and sea resources, this region has been a geopolitical hub since ancient times. The key question is whether China's strategic actions weaken US-ASEAN relations and has an impact on regional powers. This highlights the Association of Southeast Asian Nations’ (ASEAN) importance in regional stability. This study employs qualitative research that collected data through descriptive, analytical, and case studies. ASEAN is facing challenges in effectively handling the rivalry in the Indo-Pacific area. It also has the capability to manage uncertainty within the area. Nevertheless, the “power dilemma”, particularly when significant powers want to alter the circumstances, is unavoidable. The South China Sea Arbitration altered the dynamics of territorial sovereignty. Failure to resolve the territorial dispute may jeopardize the cohesion of ASEAN and have repercussions for all its member states. ASEAN law or legal mechanism, namely ARF, ADMM, Declaration of Conduct, Code of Conduct and UNCLOS faces challenges due to a lack of coherence and a central guiding principle. It is inevitable that influential forces will meddle in regional affairs. These findings imply that ASEAN's law role in integrating Southeast Asian nations and establishing positive international cooperation and strategic partnerships is vital for successfully balancing disruptive forces. ASEAN deploys hedging and enmeshment methods to ensure dynamic alignment possibilities and make strategic adjustments easier when opposing big powers maneuver. Relevant analysis strongly suggests that ASEAN, a regional stability instrument, can influence Sino-US competitiveness.
Rohingya in Aceh: Human Rights Vs Security Justice Islamic Law Perspective Ismayawati, Any; Ngazizah, Inna Fauziatal; Abd Aziz, Saidatul Nadia
Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia Vol 7, No 3 (2025)
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jphi.v7i3.428-444

Abstract

The humanitarian crisis affecting the Rohingya ethnic group has driven thousands of asylum seekers to Southeast Asia, including Aceh Province, where the majority of the population is Muslim and Sharia law is applied. This situation raises important issues regarding the protection of human rights for both the Muslim community in Aceh and Rohingya asylum seekers. The purpose of this study is to analyse the Islamic legal perspective on human rights protection in Aceh and to examine the dilemma between security and humanity in the handling of Rohingya refugees. The method used is descriptive qualitative study with a normative-sociological approach through analysis of literature, Aceh sharia regulations, and international and national human rights documents. The results of the study show that Islamic legal principles, such as hifz al-nafs and hifz al-insaniyyah, provide a strong basis for the acceptance and protection of refugees. However, their implementation faces challenges in the form of social resistance, limited facilities, and concerns about local security disturbances. The conclusion that can be drawn is that human rights protection in Aceh can only be effective if there is harmonisation between Sharia values, security policies, and humanitarian commitments through the synergy of the government, religious scholars, and the community.
Money Politics in Indonesian Regional Election Disputes: Constitutional Court Reasoning and Electoral Integrity Diar, Adithiya; Zarkasi, A; Sayuti, Sayuti; Abd Aziz, Saidatul Nadia; Antasari, Rr. Rina
Jambe Law Journal Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): (In progress)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Jambi University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/1e65hh11

Abstract

This article examines how the Constitutional Court assesses and interprets money politics in dispute cases over regional head election results in Indonesia and what this court settlement means for electoral integrity. It addresses three dispute cases concerning vote-buying allegations in regional elections, corruption of voter choice, violations of constitutionally mandated electoral processes, and examines the effect of money politics on the legitimacy of revoting. As normative legal research, this article analyses how the Court formulates its legal reasoning, applies standards of proof, and evaluates the relationship between electoral violations and final results. It is learnt that the Court has developed a relatively consistent reasoning model. The Court initially determines whether sufficiently convincing facts support a finding of vote buying, examines whether the violation has tainted the purity of voter choice, and subsequently assesses whether the violation has had a significant effect on the election outcome. This article further demonstrates that money politics is no longer viewed merely as an electoral crime, but as a constitutional issue when it undermines democratic legitimacy and distorts the authenticity of electoral results. Unlike earlier studies that mainly discuss money politics in terms of its forms, causes, or general consequences for local democracy, this article frames jurisprudential consistency as the central analytical problem. It offers a more systematic account of how the Court connects proof, voter autonomy, and electoral impact. It argues that clearer more predictable standards are needed to strengthen legal certainty, improve the adjudication of election disputes, and reinforce protections for electoral integrity in Indonesia
Co-Authors A Zarkasi Adithiya Diar Any Ismayawati Basir, Salawati Mat Inna Fauziatal Ngazizah Rr. Rina Antasari Salawati Mat Basir, Salawati Mat Sayuti Sayuti