Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.152
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal KOMUNIKA Al-Mu'awanah Jurnal Signal PANDITA: Interdisciplinary Journal of Public Affairs
Ahmad, Entus Nuryana
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : PANDITA: Interdisciplinary Journal of Public Affairs

 1 
Perempuan dalam Media: Framing Berita Penyebaran Video Asusila Gisella Anastasia dan Michael Yakinobu Defretes Siregar, Marakhilda; Ahmad, Entus Nuryana; Kusuma, Rr Chusnu Syarifa Diah
PANDITA: Interdisciplinary Journal of Public Affairs Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Juli - Desember
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Administrasi Universitas Krisnadwipayana Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61332/ijpa.v8i2.334

Abstract

The pornographic video case involving Indonesian public figures Gisella Anastasia and Michael Yakinobu De Fretes attracted widespread public attention in the end of 2020. Their legal status sparked debate, particularly regarding the application of Indonesia’s Pornography Law and questions of legal accountability. This study aims to analyze how two national media outlets, Tempo.co and Republika.co.id, framed their news coverage of the case. A qualitative descriptive approach was employed, utilizing Robert N. Entman’s framing analysis model, which consists of four key elements: defining problems, diagnosing causes, making moral judgments, and offering treatment recommendations. The research analyzed 16 online news articles published by the two media outlets during the peak of the controversy. The findings reveal that Tempo.co framed the incident as an act of criminalization against Gisella Anastasia, criticizing the legal action as disproportionate and suggesting a need for legal review. In contrast, Republika.co.id emphasized moral and personal aspects of Gisella’s identity, constructing a narrative that steered public opinion toward viewing her as culpable. Both media were also found to highlight sensational elements and economic interests in their reporting, while giving limited attention to the role of judicial institutions and the broader issue of legal justice. These findings suggest that media framing in this case not only reflects the ideological orientation of each outlet, but also serves as a tool for shaping public perception in alignment with particular interests.
Co-Authors Ahmad, Syukron Andiyansari, Popi Asrima, Nuri Pari Julia Budiyanti, Elisa Dalili, Dalili Febrianto, Faisal Hana Siregar, Marakhilda Namora Karindra, Evrilya Deby Kusuma, Rr Chusnu Syarifa Diah Listiyani, Arfina Nabila, Silvi Ni Luh Ratih Maha Rani Siregar, Marakhilda Wulan, Nawang