Masithoh, Mutia Qori Dewi
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Customary criminal law in the Eastern of Indonesia: the special autonomy Province of Papua Aisy, Salsabila Rahadatul’; Hakim, Hary Abdul; Krisnan, Johny; Hardyanthi, Try; Masithoh, Mutia Qori Dewi
Borobudur Law Review Vol 3 No 2 (2021): Vol 3 No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31603/burrev.5553

Abstract

Autonomy is often seen as an institutional instrument to manage sub state nationalist conflict. Its implementation is also a key in determining its impact on conflict. After the reform period 1999 “Autonomy and Decentralization” in Indonesia are widely welcomed. While Papua is an inseparable part of special autonomy in Indonesia. Papua as a former Dutch territory which was later handed over to Indonesia has many advantages, both in terms of culture, customary law and natural resources. But on the other hand, the fact is that the indigenous Papuan people does not agree to join as part of Indonesian territory. This rejection was accompanied by separatist actions based on their interest mentioned in the memorandum for Papuan independence. This research is the first to aim to measure whether the special autonomy given to Papua has been effectively carried out in an effort to defend Papua as a part of Indonesia. Second, in the application of this special autonomy related to the existent of customary criminal law in papua. The research used normative legal research by statute approach, the data collected through library research and also analysed used descriptive qualitative. So it is concluded that the application of the special autonomy given to Papua has a big impact on democracy in Indonesia, as well as the Papua regional government given specialization in managing its regional potential. Although there are still problems in its implementation.
AI in Law: How Artificial Intelligence Is Transforming the Legal Profession in Indonesia Masithoh, Mutia Qori Dewi; Hakim, Hary Abdul; Praja, Chrisna Bagus Edhita; Iswanto, Bambang Tjatur
JUSTITIA JURNAL HUKUM Vol 7 No 2 (2023): Justitia Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30651/justitia.v7i2.17832

Abstract

The profess on the development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has widely transformed a new era in the digital technology, social economic, human need and professional behavior. Eventually, artificial intelligence automates even more aspects of legal profession. Furthermore, AI allows the legal profession to automate lower-level tasks, freeing time to focus on complex analysis and client interaction. The research aims to know the literacy of legal professional on the use of AI. The methods used in this study are normative-empirical legal research. Furthermore, research uses primary data which obtained from questionary survey, secondary data i.e., law, books, journals and other related legal sources for research. Meanwhile, the research will analyze through descriptive qualitatively. The research shows that the literacy level of law enforcers in the use of AI is in the medium category. Data shows that 75% of legal professional shows their positive respond about the implementation of AI in their profession. While other shows, 8% of high percentage and 17% of low percentage.
AI in Law: How Artificial Intelligence Is Transforming the Legal Profession in Indonesia Masithoh, Mutia Qori Dewi; Hakim, Hary Abdul; Praja, Chrisna Bagus Edhita; Iswanto, Bambang Tjatur
JUSTITIA JURNAL HUKUM Vol 7 No 2 (2023): Justitia Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30651/justitia.v7i2.17832

Abstract

The profess on the development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has widely transformed a new era in the digital technology, social economic, human need and professional behavior. Eventually, artificial intelligence automates even more aspects of legal profession. Furthermore, AI allows the legal profession to automate lower-level tasks, freeing time to focus on complex analysis and client interaction. The research aims to know the literacy of legal professional on the use of AI. The methods used in this study are normative-empirical legal research. Furthermore, research uses primary data which obtained from questionary survey, secondary data i.e., law, books, journals and other related legal sources for research. Meanwhile, the research will analyze through descriptive qualitatively. The research shows that the literacy level of law enforcers in the use of AI is in the medium category. Data shows that 75% of legal professional shows their positive respond about the implementation of AI in their profession. While other shows, 8% of high percentage and 17% of low percentage.