Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 8 Documents
Search

GeoGebra Landscape Research in Mathematics Learning Ritmayanti, Indah Rahmania; Fitri, Rahmia Mulya; Dasari, Dadan; Samosir, Christina Monika; Marchy, Febrinna
PRISMA Vol 13, No 1 (2024): PRISMA
Publisher : Universitas Suryakancana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35194/jp.v13i1.3830

Abstract

GeoGebra is a software designed to facilitate the teaching and learning of mathematics, aiming to enhance students' comprehension of math concepts through its various digital tools and interactive features. The purpose of this study was to examine the research landscape related to the use of GeoGebra in the learning of mathematics. A descriptive bibliometric analysis method was used in this study. The data was retrieved from the Scopus database. According to the study, the number of publications related to GeoGebra in mathematics learning fluctuates annually. The year 2015 saw the highest number of citations compared to any other year. Turkey is the most influential country in this field. In the 2010–2015 and 2016–2020 ranges, the research focus was almost the same, or in other words, there were no significant differences in keywords. However, in the 2021–2023 range, the research focus has a renewal. Many new keywords have appeared.
Students' Difficulty in Understanding Problems in the Contextual Problem-Solving Process Samosir, Christina Monika; Herman, Tatang; Prabawanto, Sufyani; Melani, Rini; Mefiana, Syifa Ananda
PRISMA Vol 13, No 1 (2024): PRISMA
Publisher : Universitas Suryakancana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35194/jp.v13i1.3726

Abstract

The main procedure that students need to master in the problem-solving process is understanding the problem before proceeding to the next steps. This research aims to investigate students' difficulties and the factors causing these difficulties in understanding the problem. This research is qualitative in nature and is based on the philosophy of phenomenology. The research was conducted in an eighth-grade class at one of the Junior High Schools in Bandung, consisting of 28 students. Data collection techniques included tests, interviews, and think-aloud methods. The data collection instruments used were tests and interview guides. The tests used in this research had been previously validated for content, construct, and face validity by mathematics education experts. Data analysis in qualitative research involves data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The findings of this research indicate that the difficulties faced by students in understanding the problem include difficulties in comprehending language, difficulties in grasping both explicit and implicit meanings, difficulties in identifying the necessary information, and difficulties in connecting meanings. The main factors causing students' difficulties in understanding the problem are a lack of careful reading skills and a lack of understanding of the concepts held by students.
STUDENTS’ WAYS OF UNDERSTANDING AND THINKING BASED ON HAREL’S THEORY IN SOLVING SET PROBLEMS Samosir, Christina Monika; Herman, Tatang
JOHME: Journal of Holistic Mathematics Education Vol 7, No 2 (2023): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/johme.v7i2.7422

Abstract

Ways of thinking (WoT) and Ways of Understanding (WoU) are important in learning mathematics. This study aims to analyze the characteristics of students' ways of thinking (WoT) and ways of understanding (WoU) when solving set problems. The participants in this study were 27 students in the seventh grade at a private secondary school in Bandung. Four students were selected as research subjects. The research method used is qualitative research. The instruments in this study were the researchers and the set material problem-solving test. The data collection technique in this study was carried out through a test, interviews, and documentation. The research results showed that the majority of students who were correct in their way of thinking were also correct in their way of understanding. And the majority of students who have the incorrect way of thinking also have the incorrect way of understanding.  The study's results also indicated that the majority of student errors stemmed from a lack of proper understanding of the question and the concept of set theory.BAHASA INDONESIA ABSTRACT: Cara berpikir dan cara memahami merupakan hal yang penting dalam belajar matematika. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis karakteristik cara berpikir dan cara memahami siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah himpunan. Partisipan pada penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VII di salah satu SMP Swasta di Bandung berjumlah 27 partisipan. Empat siswa dipilih sebagai subjek penelitian. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian kualitatif. Instrumen dalam penelitian ini adalah peneliti sendiri dan tes pemecahan masalah materi himpunan. Teknik pengumpulan data dalam penelitian ini dilakukan dengan memberikan tes, wawancara dan dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa mayoritas siswa yang memiliki cara berpikir yang benar juga memiliki cara pemahaman yang benar. Dan mayoritas siswa yang memiliki cara berpikir yang salah juga memiliki cara pemahaman yang salah. Hasil penelitian juga menunjukkan bahwa sebagian besar kesalahan siswa disebabkan karena siswa kurang memahami soal dan konsep materi himpunan dengan baik.
Bibliometric analysis: Learning outcomes research in mathematics learning (1992-2023) Muhammad, Ilham; Marchy, Febrinna; Elmawati, Elmawati; Samosir, Christina Monika
Jurnal Kajian Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 7, No 1 (2023): JURNAL KAJIAN PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS NEGERI MALANG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17977/um076v7i12023p13-23

Abstract

Learning Outcomes are values, attitudes and skills as a result of the learning process. The purpose of this study is to look at the research landscape related to learning outcomes in mathematics learning from 1992 to 2023. The method used is descriptive bibliometric analysis. The data taken comes from the enhanced Scopus database. The results showed that the trend of the most publications related to learning outcomes in learning mathematics was in 2020 and 2022 with a total of 14 publications. The most citation trend occurred in the 2009 publication which has been cited 262 times. The country that has had a major impact on research on learning outcomes in mathematics learning is the United States of America. The research focus is divided into three parts, namely, 1) motivation and reasoning; 2) , technology and higher school; 3) universities and assessments. New themes in this field are mathematical problems, higher education, blended learning and geogebra. The learning outcomes keyword is not directly connected with the 7 other keywords, namely, ict, critical thinking, mathematics achievement, pre service teacher, gender different, secondary school. Keywords with new themes such as mathematical problems are not together with learning outcomes but are not directly connected with keywords with other new themes such as higher education, blended learning and geogebra
Research on Self-Regulated Learning in Mathematics Learning (1980-2023): A Bibliometric Review Marchy, Febrinna; Elmawati, Elmawati; Samosir, Christina Monika; Muhammad, Ilham
JURNAL PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA Vol 7, No 2: November 2023
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/kontinu.7.2.1-18

Abstract

Self Regulated Learning (SRL) is the ability of individuals to effectively use various strategies in achieve their learning goals. The purpose of this study is to capture the research landscape related to Self-Regulation Student learning at the secondary school level from 1980 to 2023. The method used in this study is a descriptive bibliometric analysis method, it is aimed at analyzing scientific literature, focusing on the measurement and description of patterns in bibliographic data. The Scopus database is used as the research data. The results showed that a rapid increase in the number of publications occurred from 2014 to 2015 and from 2017 to 2018. Publications in 2006 were cited more than any other year. The United States of America is the most influential country in this field. Publications in journals related to self-regulated research The most learning is at the Q1 level. The focus of research related to this field is divided into three parts, namely, 1) development, practice, and tasks; 2) strategy, mathematics achievements, and reasoning; 3) environment and understanding. The new theme in this research is self efficacy, attitude, environment, age and reasoning.
STUDENTS’ WAYS OF UNDERSTANDING AND THINKING BASED ON HAREL’S THEORY IN SOLVING SET PROBLEMS Samosir, Christina Monika; Herman, Tatang
JOHME: Journal of Holistic Mathematics Education Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/johme.v7i2.7422

Abstract

Ways of thinking (WoT) and Ways of Understanding (WoU) are important in learning mathematics. This study aims to analyze the characteristics of students' ways of thinking (WoT) and ways of understanding (WoU) when solving set problems. The participants in this study were 27 students in the seventh grade at a private secondary school in Bandung. Four students were selected as research subjects. The research method used is qualitative research. The instruments in this study were the researchers and the set material problem-solving test. The data collection technique in this study was carried out through a test, interviews, and documentation. The research results showed that the majority of students who were correct in their way of thinking were also correct in their way of understanding. And the majority of students who have the incorrect way of thinking also have the incorrect way of understanding.  The study's results also indicated that the majority of student errors stemmed from a lack of proper understanding of the question and the concept of set theory.BAHASA INDONESIA ABSTRACT: Cara berpikir dan cara memahami merupakan hal yang penting dalam belajar matematika. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis karakteristik cara berpikir dan cara memahami siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah himpunan. Partisipan pada penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VII di salah satu SMP Swasta di Bandung berjumlah 27 partisipan. Empat siswa dipilih sebagai subjek penelitian. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian kualitatif. Instrumen dalam penelitian ini adalah peneliti sendiri dan tes pemecahan masalah materi himpunan. Teknik pengumpulan data dalam penelitian ini dilakukan dengan memberikan tes, wawancara dan dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa mayoritas siswa yang memiliki cara berpikir yang benar juga memiliki cara pemahaman yang benar. Dan mayoritas siswa yang memiliki cara berpikir yang salah juga memiliki cara pemahaman yang salah. Hasil penelitian juga menunjukkan bahwa sebagian besar kesalahan siswa disebabkan karena siswa kurang memahami soal dan konsep materi himpunan dengan baik.
How Students Make Model and Promote Productive Struggle in Solving Mathematical Problems Melani, Rini; Herman, Tatang; Prabawanto, Sufyani; Samosir, Christina Monika; Mefiana, Syifa Ananda
JETL (Journal of Education, Teaching and Learning) Vol 9, No 1 (2024): Volume 9 Number 1 March 2024
Publisher : STKIP Singkawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26737/jetl.v9i1.5108

Abstract

Making mathematical models involves translating real-life situations into mathematical expressions. This research, conducted in three Bandung schools with 93 students, focuses on iconic and symbolic mathematical models. Findings reveal that students' abilities using these models are below the expected minimum, with symbolic models being more dominant. The score difference may be influenced by the teacher's role, students' experiences, individual abilities, and specific contexts favoring visual understanding. Students face challenges in making mathematical models, including a lack of comprehensive understanding, difficulty identifying variables, creating context-free models, and struggling with relevant visualizations. Additionally, they encounter issues using formulas and interpreting mathematical results when answering questions. In the validation stage, adjusting temporary results to real situations poses challenges. Internal factors contributing to difficulties include a lack of interest, critical limitations, and low self-confidence. External factors like a limited practical experience in making models also play a role. A holistic solution addressing both internal and external factors is essential for students to overcome challenges and enhance their ability to create mathematical models from real-world contexts. The recommended role of the productive struggle learning approach is crucial in assisting students in achieving the expected milestones.
Profile of Students' Problem Solving Ability in Solving Contextual Problems Viewed from Productive Struggle Mefiana, Syifa Ananda; Herman, Tatang; Hasanah, Aan; Samosir, Christina Monika; Melani, Rini
JETL (Journal of Education, Teaching and Learning) Vol 9, No 2 (2024): Volume 9 Number 2 September 2024
Publisher : STKIP Singkawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26737/jetl.v9i2.5144

Abstract

Problem solving ability is the ability that allows students to use understanding and facts to solve math problems. Productive struggle is the attitude shown by students when overcoming the difficulties they experience. This study aims to investigate and analyze problem solving ability based on students' productive struggle in solving contextual problems. The research method used is a qualitative approach with data collection techniques through problem solving ability tests, questionnaires regarding productive struggle, and interviews. The research subjects consisted of VIII grade students in several junior high schools. Data analysis was conducted by detailing test results, examining questionnaire responses, and analyzing interviews. The subjects were collected and selected based on the categories of high, medium and low productive struggle. This shows that the problem-solving ability of subjects with high productive struggle is very good, while subjects with medium and low struggle have not shown good things in problem solving ability. This is due to how to overcome the difficulties experienced by students.