Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

حكم تعزير مانع الزكاة بأخذ المال عند المذاهب الأربعة Mukran H. Usman; Bukhari, Imran; Awal Rifai Wahab; Firdaus, Aris
البصيرة: مجلة الدراسات الإسلامية Vol 2 No 2 (2021): البصيرة: مجلة الدراسات الإسلامية
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (P3M), Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Islam dan Bahasa Arab (STIBA) Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36701/bashirah.v2i2.419

Abstract

Zakat obligation is matter in religion that are logically already known. Refusing to pay zakat due to ignorance and greed is one of the great sins in afterlife law, and is among the most heinous crimes in worldly law. This research discusses the law of takzir against people who are reluctant to pay zakat by taking their property according to the four schools. This research aims to find out the opinions of the four schools of jurisprudence about the law of takzir against people who are reluctant to pay zakat by taking their property (forcibly), and to know the understanding of disputes of opinion about the takzir against people who are reluctant to pay zakat by taking their property according to four schools. The research methods used in research are inductive-deductive and comparative methods. The results showed that the four schools of jurisprudence agreed to impose takzir on people who are reluctant to pay zakat by taking their property forcibly according to the obligatory zakat rate on it without additional. While some scholars consider that takzir for people who are reluctant to pay zakat is to take their property forcibly according to the obligatory zakat rate on it accompanied by additional punishment that takes half of its property. This is the opinion of the old Shafii (qaul qadīm), one of the narration of Imam Ahmad, as well as the opinion of some scholars such as al-Auzāʿī, Isḥāq bin Rāhūyah, Ibn al-ʿUṡaimīn, in addition to the opinion of the permanent of Fatwa Commission of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. As for the understanding of dissent in this matter is the knowledge that every school of jurisprudence has a proposition as a guideline to strengthen its opinion, so that the difference should not be the cause of division and hostility among the Muslims.
Navigating Sharia Compliance in the Digital Age: An Examination of Bank Indonesia’s Hedging Swap Regulation (PBI 24/7/2022) Anggraeni, Sinta Thia; Bukhari, Imran; Dahmayanti, Andi
Indonesian Journal of Islamic Economic Law Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Indonesian Journal of Islamic Economic Law
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/ijoel.v2i1.5257

Abstract

The present study aims to examine the alignment of Islamic values with the principles of efficiency and profitability, as contained in Bank Indonesia's Hedging Swap regulation, to ensure innovation in the digital financial sector. The objective of this study is to ascertain how the integration of contemporary banking law with fiqh can establish a framework that facilitates the development of Shariah compliant digital financial products that comply with financial law based on Islamic principles without compromising the capacity of banks to generate profits. This research adopted a qualitative methodology and a literature study approach, employing data processing techniques to collect and evaluate pertinent literature on digital financial products and Islamic jurisprudence. The data triangulation method was applied by sorting and extracting through a deductive approach to data interpretation specific to the research objectives. The study concluded that the al-tahawwuth al-murakkab contract successfully integrates Islamic principles, bank profits and the dynamics of the digital era. However, the approach is only relevant for commercial banks and does not fully support digital transformation in micro scale banks.