Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Examination Of The Ruling Of The Syar'iyah Court On Divorce Cases Lawsuit Abdullah, Asnawi; Toguan, Zulfikri; Syahrul, Fatahillah; Saleh, Muhammad
Journal of Mujaddid Nusantara Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Journal of Mujaddid Nusantara March, 2024
Publisher : Institute of Education and Social Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62568/jomn.v1i1.102

Abstract

When there is an indication of judicial negligence in providing legal considerations, it is highly possible to conduct an examination or investigation. The decision of the Bireuen Sharia Court regarding divorce on demand, the panel of judges pronounced talak ba’in sughrā against the plaintiff without first attempting reconciliation through the appointment of an arbitrator. Looking at the legal provisions, when a case falls under shiqāq, the judge must appoint an arbitrator. Therefore, departing from this issue, there is a need for an examination as to why the judge did not appoint an arbitrator to resolve the dispute and what legal considerations were provided by the judge. This study is designed with a qualitative pattern, utilizing a statutory approach. Data collection techniques involve documentation and interviews. The research findings prove that the panel of judges argued that it did not fall under shiqāq cases, hence the appointment of an arbitrator was not necessary. The legal considerations provided by the judge in the divorce ruling include fiqhiyah principles, legal provisions, Supreme Court jurisprudence, Quranic verse al-Rūm ayat 21, and fiqhiyah principles.
Debtors Responsibilities in Subsidized Home Loan Takeovers Based on Indonesian Ministerial Regulation Number 26/PRT/M/2016 Toguan, Zulfikri; Ernayani, Rihfenti; Nainunis, Nainunis
Journal of Mujaddid Nusantara Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Journal of Mujaddid Nusantara September, 2024
Publisher : Institute of Education and Social Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62568/jomn.v1i3.109

Abstract

The transfer of ownership for Subsidized Home Ownership Loans (KPR) is prohibited unless the property has been occupied for over 5 years. Despite this rule, violations frequently occur, highlighting gaps in enforcement and a lack of debtor responsibility in credit repayment. This study addresses two main questions: 1) What are the responsibilities of debtors in taking over subsidized KPR based on Regulation Number 26/PRT/M/2016 at Bela Berlian 3 Housing, Kampar Regency? 2) What are the legal consequences for debtors in such takeovers? Using empirical legal research with primary data, the study found that debtors often fail to meet their obligations, including the misuse of bank funds intended for housing debt repayment. This leads to defaults and breaches of contract. Unauthorized takeovers may result in the withdrawal of KPR subsidies, but enforcement remains inconsistent, causing legal uncertainty for new debtors. The research calls for stronger enforcement to prevent unauthorized KPR ownership transfers.
Kekuatan Hukum Dan Perlindungan Hak Merek Produk Dalam Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek Dan Indikasi Geografis Thalib, Abd; Toguan, Zulfikri; Putra, Bambang Andi; Thalib, Nur Aisyah
Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Vol 20, No 2 (2023): Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia - Juni 2023
Publisher : Direktorat Jenderal Peraturan Perundang-undang, Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54629/jli.v20i2.997

Abstract

AbstractA trademark gives somebody or a company the right to use certain distinctive marks. This allows the business to increase its commercial value, goodwill, and reputation in the eyes of its customers. However, there are several instances where the trademark Registrar will refuse to grant a trademark. A trademark registration application can generally be objected to for registration on absolute or relative grounds for denial, such as conflict with earlier trademarks and well-known marks, or because it is forbidden for registration. This article attempts to examine the legal force of registered trademarks, and analyze the barriers to acceptance of trademark applications. The research method employed here is doctrinal or broadly speaking called as a library research with some legal cases, legal material collection techniques using literature studies and legal material analysis using content analysis. The results of the study show that mark is deceptively similar to an existing trademark, the Registrar may refuse to grant registration. This is however, approved that is a subjective assessment. Keywords: Legal Strength, Protection, TrademarksAbstrakMerek dagang memberi seseorang atau perusahaan hak untuk menggunakan merek khusus tertentu. Hal ini memungkinkan bisnis untuk bisa meningkatkan nilai komersial, nama baik, dan reputasinya di mata pelanggannya. Namun, ada beberapa contoh di mana Pencatat merek dagang akan menolak untuk memberikan merek dagang. Permohonan pendaftaran merek pada umumnya dapat ditolak pendaftarannya atas dasar penolakan mutlak atau relatif, seperti bertentangan dengan merek sebelumnya dan merek terkenal, atau karena dilarang pendaftarannya. Artikel ini mencoba menguji kekuatan hukum terhadap merek dagang terdaftar, dan menganalisis halangan penerimaan permohonan merek. Metode penelitian yang digunakan di sini adalah doktrinal atau secara garis besar disebut penelitian kepustakaan dengan beberapa kasus hukum, teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum menggunakan studi kepustakaan dan analisis bahan hukum menggunakan analisis isi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa merek menipu mirip dengan merek yang ada sebelumnya, Petugas Pendaftar dapat menolak untuk memberikan pendaftaran. Bagaimanapun, ini adalah suatu bukti dari penilaian subjektif. Kata Kunci: Kekuatan Hukum, Perlindungan, Merek Dagang.
The Implementation of Auction Cancellation as a Legal Remedy for Auction Execution Under Law No. 4 of 1996 Toguan, Zulfikri; Anggraini, Desra
Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Islam Almatani

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55583/jkih.v4i1.1348

Abstract

The issues arising in the implementation of auction cancellation and the sale of auctioned objects based on mortgage rights are related to objections or lawsuits from the debtor, as well as objections from the debtor regarding the auction carried out by the creditor through an auction house. The research questions in this research includes: 1) How is the implementation of auction cancellation as a legal remedy for objections against the auction process according to Law No. 4 of 1996, and 2) What are the obstacles in the implementation of auction cancellation as a legal remedy for auction execution under Law No. 4 of 1996. To address these issues, this research employs a sociological empirical method, where the researcher conducts field research to obtain both primary and secondary data relevant to the research topic. The research is descriptive, aiming to describe the research findings by analyzing statements clearly, in detail, and comprehensively. Based on the research findings, the implementation of auction cancellation and the examination process in the auction involves several stages, such as registration, submission, examination, proof, and decision. On the other hand, obstacles faced in the implementation of auction cancellation include rejection by the defendant, the sale of auctioned objects, and execution.