Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Analisis Yuridis Penggeledahan Paksa Handphone oleh Tim Patroli Kepolisian Purwanto, Eko Joko; Chandra, Tofik Yanuar; Paparang, Santrawan T.
Halu Oleo Law Review Vol 6, No 1 (2022): Halu Oleo Law Review: Volume 6 Issue 1
Publisher : Halu Oleo University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33561/holrev.v6i1.24293

Abstract

Penggeledahan adalah tindakan penyidik yang dibenarkan undang-undang untuk memasuki dan melakukan pemeriksaan di rumah tempat kediaman seseorang atau untuk melakukan pemeriksaan terhadap badan dan pakaian seseorang. Ketentuan hukum penggeledahan dalam hukum acara pidana terdapat pada Pasal 1 butir 17 dan 18 KUHAP merupakan penjelasan tentang apa yang dimaksud dengan penggeledahan; Pasal 5 (1) huruf b pasal 7 (1) huruf d pasal 11, pasal 32 dan pasal 37 KUHAP mengatur tentang kewenangan Penyidik/Penyidik Pembantu dalam hal penggeledahan; Pasal 33 KUHAP mengatur tentang syarat dan tata cara penggeledahan; Pasal 34 KUHAP mengatur tentang alasan penggeledahan tanpa izin dari ketua PN serta tindakan yang tidak diperkenankan; dan Pasal 36 KUHAP mengatur tentang pelaksanaan penggeledahan rumah di luar daerah hukum penyidik/penyidik pembantu. Begitu ketat dan kakunya aturan-aturan mengenai penggeledahan ini sehingga tim kepolisian tidak bisa sewenang-wenang dalam melakukan upaya penggeledahan paksa terhadap seseorang. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konsep (conceptual approach). Hasil penelitian ini yaitu penegak hukum khususnya penyidik dalam melakukan penggeledahan paksa handphone seseorang tidak bisa sewenang-wenang akan tetapi pelaksanaan penggeledahan tersebut harus didasari atau dilandasi oleh suatu peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku.
EFEKTIVITAS PENERAPAN  REHABILITASI TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA DI INDONESIA Riyadi, Trisno; Chandra, Tofik Yanuar; Paparang, Santrawan T.
SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 2 No. 8 (2025): SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Agustus 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/sinergi.v2i8.1638

Abstract

Narcotics crime is an extraordinary offense that has serious impacts on individuals, society, and the state. In its handling, there has been a paradigm shift from repressive approaches to rehabilitative ones, particularly for addicts or narcotics abusers. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the rehabilitation implementation for narcotics crime perpetrators in Indonesia, based on the current legal framework, particularly by comparing the old Penal Code (Law No. 1 of 1946) with the new National Penal Code (Law No. 1 of 2023), as well as Law No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. This research adopts a normative juridical method with statutory, case, conceptual, and analytical approaches. The data were obtained from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials and analyzed using legal interpretation and legal construction methods. The study examines the types of rehabilitation applied in Indonesia, both medical and social, including case studies such as the decisions involving Tri Retno Prayudati (Nunung) and Reza Pardede (Coki Pardede), which demonstrate the varied application of rehabilitation among similar offenders. The main findings reveal that although rehabilitation is formally accommodated in national regulations, its implementation remains suboptimal. Obstacles such as inconsistent understanding among law enforcement officers, limited rehabilitation facilities, and the lack of clear parameters to distinguish users from dealers hinder effective enforcement. The disparity in treatment among narcotics offenders remains high, as illustrated by the case of Nunu Nurhayati, who received a prison sentence without rehabilitation. This study applies restorative justice theories from Howard Zehr and Tony Marshall, emphasizing the restoration of social relationships and individual recovery over punishment, as well as effectiveness theories from Soerjono Soekanto and Lawrence M. Friedman to evaluate the legal policy's effectiveness. The study concludes that applying rehabilitation to narcotics offenders is more in line with the principles of restorative justice and human rights protection. Therefore, the state needs to strengthen the legal foundation and technical implementation of rehabilitation and shift the paradigm among law enforcers and society to view addicts not as criminals, but as individuals in need of recovery.
PERTANGGUNG JAWABAN PIDANA KORPORASIPELAKU TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSIDALAM TATA KELOLA NIAGA KOMODITAS DI INDONESIA Saragih, Handa Yusico; Chandra, Tofik Yanuar; Paparang, Santrawan T.
SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 2 No. 8 (2025): SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Agustus 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/sinergi.v2i8.1639

Abstract

This study examines the issue of corporate criminal liability in corruption cases occurring within the governance of Indonesia’s commodity trade sector. Corruption in this sector is marked by its complexity, often involving strategic national commodities such as mining products, plantation outputs, and state-managed funds. These offenses are frequently not committed directly by individuals but instead facilitated and executed through corporate entities that function as primary perpetrators or instruments of organized crime. Corporations, beyond being legal entities, possess internal systems capable of structuring and concealing illegal activities through collective decision-making mechanisms. The research aims to identify specific forms of corruption committed by corporations in commodity governance and to analyze how criminal liability can be applied to these legal entities. The study employs a normative juridical method with statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. It focuses on four major court decisions: the Jiwasraya case (Joko Hartono Tirto), the Asabri case (Maj. Gen. (Ret.) Adam Rachmat Damiri), the illegal tin export case (Harvey Moeis), and the illegal land acquisition case involving Surya Darmadi and Duta Palma Group. Findings reveal eight primary forms of corruption within this context: price mark-ups, manipulation of export/import quotas, falsification of production data and documents, collusion in vendor appointments using fictitious partners, concealment of illicit proceeds, illegal exports without permits, unauthorized land control, and evasion of financial obligations such as taxes, royalties, and non-tax state revenues (PNBP). Corporate liability may be established through the identification theory, vicarious liability, and strict liability principles, in line with Supreme Court Regulation No. 13 of 2016 and Article 20 of the Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP Nasional). The study concludes that criminal law enforcement must move beyond punishing individuals to targeting the corporate structures that enable systemic corruption. A structural and policy-oriented approach to corporate criminal liability is essential to ensure deterrence and promote integrity in national commodity governance