Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Effects of Gender, Study Major, and Year of Study on Prospective Teachers’ Mathematical, Didactic, and Technological Knowledge Putra, Zetra Hainul; Hermita, Neni; Yuliani, Suci; Fatmawilda, Fatmawilda
JOURNAL OF TEACHING AND LEARNING IN ELEMENTARY EDUCATION (JTLEE) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): August 2022
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP Universitas Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33578/

Abstract

Teachers’ mathematical, didactic, and technological knowledge has been a central issue for the last few decades. Therefore, this study investigates and compares prospective teachers’ mathematical, didactic, and technological knowledge referring to gender, year of study, and academic major. This study used an online survey through online questionnaires. The population was prospective elementary and mathematics teachers from a public university in Riau province, Indonesia. The questionnaires were distributed via WhatsApp, and LMS integrated in courses in the University. There were 195 prospective teachers participated in this study. A non- parametric statistical analysis was used to compare teachers’ knowledge based on gender, year of study, and academic major. The findings reveal that there were no significant differences of teachers’ mathematical, didactic, and technological knowledge based on gender, year of study, and academic major. Therefore, mathematics learning at university has no impact on prospective teachers’ self- evaluation of their knowledge.
EFEKTIFITAS PENGGUNAAN ASESMEN SUMATIF PADA PEMANASAN GLOBAL KELAS X SMAN 1 KOTO XI TARUSAN Olivia, Olivia; Yuliani, Suci; Habib, M; Rahma, Hestia; Anaperta, Megasyani; Yanti, Iing Rika
JRFES (Jurnal Riset Fisika Edukasi dan Sains) Vol 13, No 1 (2026): Jurnal Riset Fisika Edukasi dan Sains
Publisher : Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22202/jrfes.2026.v13i1.9963

Abstract

This study was motivated by the low effectiveness of summative assessment in measuring students' understanding of the Global Warming topic in Grade X at SMAN 1 Koto XI Tarusan. As a conceptual subject, this material requires an appropriate evaluation instrument. This research employed a quantitative method by analyzing the difficulty level, discriminating power, and reliability of 20 multiple-choice questions and 5 essay questions. The results showed that most objective items were classified as easy with low discriminating power, while the essay items were of moderate difficulty, had very good discriminating power, and high reliability. These findings indicate that essay questions are more effective in assessing students’ critical thinking skills and conceptual understanding. Therefore, developing high-quality assessment instruments is essential to improve the quality of learning.