Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.92
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JHP17 (Jurnal Hasil Penelitian) Mimbar Keadilan Journal Evidence Of Law
Soeskandi, Hari
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Hak Disabilitas Dalam Aksesibilitas Ruang Publik Di Kota Surabaya Puspita, Amelia; Soeskandi, Hari
JHP17 (Jurnal Hasil Penelitian) Vol 7 No 1: Januari 2022
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/jhp17.v7i1.5995

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to find legal certainty related to not being fully guaranteed regarding disability rights in the city of Surabaya. By using a normative research method which is by reviewing the regulations regarding accessibility rights for people with disabilities in the city of Surabaya. Through the concept that the researcher created, the researcher wants to describe and describe the meaning of legal certainty on accessibility rights for persons with disabilities, which refers to the role of the Surabaya city government and the absence of sanctions for the government as the implementer and organizer of the procurement of accessibility rights for persons with disabilities. The problem regarding accessibility rights for persons with disabilities lies in the uneven implementation of accessibility rights for persons with disabilities in the city of Surabaya, where the development of accessibility for persons with disabilities is only found in certain places such as; Education Museum, Al-Akbar Mosque, Gubeng Kertajaya Sidewalk, City Government Building, and Talking Park. Which can be seen that disability in the city of Surabaya is not only located in the city center but throughout the city of Surabaya, including the suburbs. Keywords: Disability, Accessibility, Public Spatial Planning
Kejahatan HAM Ras Albino Di Afrika Prasetyo, Adi; Laksana, Agung Dwi; Ganapradipta, Masrino; Soeskandi, Hari
JHP17 (Jurnal Hasil Penelitian) Vol 5 No 2: Januari 2020
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/jhp17.v5i2.6107

Abstract

Human rights recognize forms of violation and crime, discrimination against something different is one form of violation of human rights. Africa is a large country and has many differences and gatherings of many ethnic groups and religions, it does not rule out the possibility of a conflict. In this case the albino group is often discriminated against, persecuted, bullied, raped and even killed. Ranging from babies to adults. On the basis of the background that has been written, the author will put forward a discussion about the form of what kind of human rights violations against Albino people in Africa. The method used in this journal is the Juridical Normative Method. The author uses the Juridical Normative Method to be able to find out directly in order to be able to examine how the application of the specific laws of existing international conventions about human rights violations. The results of this material discussion found that many human rights crimes were committed because of the negative stigma and myths about how albino people exist and albino people have high selling prices for spiritual needs for shamans in Africa and the black market. Discrimination against Albino people is often done even after they are born until they grow up, starting from being isolated from the surrounding environment, having difficulty getting the right to learn, the difficulty of getting the right to work, and feeling threatened if they are outside their hiding place. murder, rape, and even mutilation often occur in their lives.
HAK ANAK KONFLIK HUKUM DIPERSIDANGAN DALAM HAK ASASI MANUSIA Oktafirin, Dewi Awaliya; E, Pungky Dwiky; Soeskandi, Hari
JHP17 (Jurnal Hasil Penelitian) Vol 5 No 2: Januari 2020
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Anak merupakan cita-cita bangsa, generasi penerus serta harapan bangsa Indonesia dengan tujuan anak mampu menjadi pemimpin bangsa Indonesia oleh karena itu pendidikan wajib diberikan oleh setiap anak. Akan tetapi di Indonesia terus menerus terjadi Kasus Anak konflik hukum penyebab utama kurang adanya pengawasan orangtua secara punuh, media sosial yang mudah diakses menjadikan anak rentang terhadap maraknya kejahatan sosial yang dapat lakukan dengan mudah. Sering kali anak memperhatikan lingkungan sekitar secara tidak langsung ank mudah melakukan tindak kejahatan tanpa memikirkan kondisi serta akibatnya. Anak seharusnya mendapat pengawasan, perlindungan maksimal oleh orangtua masing-masing, sehingga anak tidak menjadi ketergangguan mental Anak mempunyai Hak yang melekat pada setiap masing-masing induvidu Hak tersebut diberikan Negara. Tujuan ditulisnya ini untuk mengetahui serta melindungi Hak-hak yang dapat diperoleh anak apabila Anak melakukan Konflik Hukum dan dapat menjalakan pendidikan, mendapatkan tempat bermain secara bebas tanpa ada yang membatasi sehingga anak tidak kehilangan Hak nya meskipun anak melakukan Konflik Hukum. Yang sering terjadi anak yang melakukan konflik hukum pihak sekolah tidak memperbolehkan anak tersebut mendapatkan pendidikan lagi atau tidak menaikkan kelas padahal hal tersebut seharusnya tidak boleh terjadi. Penulis menggunakan Metode yuridis empiris yang dimana penulis memperhatikan kejadian secara langsung dan fakta-fakta yang ada dilingkungan sekitar sehingga penulis dapat menganalisis serta memadukan sesuwai dengan aturan-aturan hukum yang berlaku. Hasil dan kesimpula penulis dalam penulisan ini banyak terjadi fenomena Anak konflik hukum yang terjadi di Indonesia hal ini akan berdampak Negatif bagi bangsa Indonesia untuk kedepanya. Oleh sebab itu perlu adanya pengawasan orang tua yang maksimal mungkin.
PENGHIDUPAN KEMBALI PASAL TERHADAP PENGHINAAN PRESIDEN DAN WAKIL PRESIDEN DALAM RANCANGAN KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA Rahmasari, Nuzul Shinta Nur; Soeskandi, Hari
Mimbar Keadilan Vol 15 No 1 (2022): Februari 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/mk.v15i1.5832

Abstract

Law Number 1 of 1946 concerning of Criminal Law is an affirmation made by the government from the enactment of Colonial Law known as Wetboek van Strafrecht (WvS) or widely known as Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP). KUHP itself should be revised with the current condition of the Indonesia. However, the revision of Criminal Law within the draft of KUHP itself consist articles which cause conflict, one of which is the article about insult directed President and/or Vice President of the Indonesia. Wheres, this article is already removed by the Constitutional Court in 2006 under the statementNumber 013/022/PUU-IV/2006. The Governmment and House of Representatives seem to have disobeyed the statement of the Constitutional Court that makes the writer of this journal decides to take the revival of the article of insult to President and/Vice President as the background of the problem of a research. Further analysis will be carried out by the writer regarding the insult of President’s dignity and honor then analyze the policy of reactivating the said article about insult of the leader of the country in RKUHP by central government and House of Representatives. The said article is considered unconstitutional by Constitutional Court (MK) and has been objected to be a part of the RKUHP or articles with the same and similar contents. The process of the analysis will still use the reference from Constitutional Court’s decision and experts’ opinion. This reserach uses juridical normative approach which aim to discover rules and also norms to answer the legal issue being faced so that the solutions of the issue in this research can be made. In this case, the reactivation of the article of insult directed to the leader of the country in RKUHP is not the proper policy to be made because it has a tendency to be used as a tool to silent the people’s voice to criticize the performance of the President and/Vice President.
PERISTILAHAN OPERASI TANGKAP TANGAN DITINJAU DARI PRESPEKTIF KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM ACARA PIDANA Krisnawati, Wahyuni; Soeskandi, Hari
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): Journal Evidence Of Law (Agustus)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (297.002 KB) | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v1i2.54

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to offer novelty related to the hand catch operation carried out by the corruption eradication commission. Using normative research that examines the application of norms or legal rules that are currently in effect. Through this concept, the researcher wants to review the authority of the corruption eradication commission in carrying out hand catch operation whether it is in accordance with the term caught red-handed in the criminal code of procedure law. This is done to avoid misinterpretation regarding the suitability of the two terms, considering that the sting operation carried out by the corruption eradication commission is not stated in any law and its implementation procedure. Being caught hand in the act of criminal procedure law has four provisions that determine whether the act can be caught red-handed or not, among others: the arrest of a person while committing a crime, or immediately after a while the crime was committed, or a moment later it is called out by the general public as the person who did it, or a moment later an object is found which is strongly suspected to have been used to commit the crime, indicating that he is the perpetrator or has participated in or assisted in committing the crime. So, through a review of the two terms, it can be concluded that the hand catch operation carried out by the corruption eradication commission is in accordance with being caught red-handed as stated in the criminal procedure code.
Co-Authors Adi Prasetyo E, Pungky Dwiky Ganapradipta, Masrino Krisnawati, Wahyuni Laksana, Agung Dwi Oktafirin, Dewi Awaliya Puspita, Amelia Rahmasari, Nuzul Shinta Nur