Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Privat Law ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum dan Kemanusiaan
Prabawani, Riski Dysas
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
ANALISIS YURIDIS PENEGAKAN HUKUM PERSEKONGKOLAN TENDER MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 5 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG LARANGAN PRAKTIK MONOPOLI DAN PERSAINGAN USAHA TIDAK SEHAT Prabawani, Riski Dysas; Kholil, Munawar
Jurnal Privat Law Vol 5, No 2 (2017): JULI-DESEMBER
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/privat.v5i2.19396

Abstract

AbstractThis article aims to determine the application of sanctions in the Commission’s Decision on Case No. 11 / KPPU-L / 2015. This article is a kind of normative law which are prescriptive and applied. The approach which is used is the approach of legislation (statute approach) and the approach of the case (case approach). The sources of legal materials consisting of primary legal materials, secondary, and tertiary collecting these techniques to the study of literature. This article used deductive analysis technique. The imposition of sanctions in the Commission’s Decision No. 11 / KPPU-L / 2015 granted to businesses still less in accordance with the provisions of Article 22 of Law No. 5 of 1999.Keywords: Conspiracy, Business CompetitionAbstrakArtikel  ini  bertujuan  untuk  mengetahui  penerapan  sanksi  pada  Putusan  KPPU  Perkara  Nomor  11/KPPU-L/2015. Artikel ini merupakan penelitian hukum nonnatif yang bersifat preskiptif dan terapan. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan Undang-undang (statute approach) dan pendekatan kasus (case approach). Sumber bahan hukum terdiri dari bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier dengan  teknik  pengumpulannya  dengan  studi  kepustakaan. Artikel  ini  nienggunakan  teknik  analisis secara deduktif. Penerapan sanksi di dalam Putusan KPPU Nomor 11/KPPU-L/2015 yang diberikan kepada pelaku usaha masih kurang sesuai dengan ketentuan Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999.Kata kunci: Persekongkonlan Tender, Persaingan Usaha
Customary Law in the New Indonesian Criminal Code: Recognition or Reduction? Susanto, Yoghi Arief; Prabawani, Riski Dysas; Aulia Najah, Naily
ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum dan Kemanusiaan Vol. 19 No. 1 (2025): ADLIYA : Jurnal Hukum dan Kemanusiaan
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/adliya.v19i1.44458

Abstract

The new Indonesian Criminal Code, as stipulated in Article 2 of Law No. 1/2023, formally acknowledges customary criminal law as the basis for determining criminal liability. Its implementation is further specified in government regulations, as guidelines for regions in formulating laws that reflect community-based principles. However, this arrangement potentially engenders legal issues, including jurisdictional conflicts and the erosion of local wisdom. This study seeks to analyse whether the provisions represent a recognition or reduction of customary criminal law. The analysis is grounded in the legal pluralism theory, which emphasises the interaction between various legal systems in society, and the theory of law and society, which views law as a social phenomenon shaped by local values and culture. As doctrinal research, this study utilises primary and secondary legal materials, employing a qualitative analysis approach informed by legal hermeneutics. The findings suggest that Article 2 of Law No. 1/2023, concerning the Criminal Code, acknowledges the validity of customary criminal law in Indonesia. From theoretical, legal, and practical perspectives, this provision plays a crucial role in Indonesian judicial practice. However, such recognition should not be construed as subordination within a hierarchical regulatory framework that could undermine the autonomy of customary criminal law. Instead, it should serve as a framework for legal coexistence, where mutual respect is fostered as an adaptation to the challenges of global complexity, thus preserving Indonesia’s pluralistic legal identity.
Co-Authors Aulia Najah, Naily Munawar Kholil Susanto, Yoghi Arief