Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

KONTINUITAS PENGEMBANGAN MISIL BALISTIK IRAN SEBAGAI RESPON TERHADAP DINAMIKA PERSENJATAAN DI KAWASAN TELUK Fajar Imam Zarkasyi
Dauliyah Journal of Islamic and International Affairs Vol 2, No 2 (2017): DAULIYAH (JOURNAL AND ISLAMIC AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS)
Publisher : UNIDA Gontor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (505.484 KB) | DOI: 10.21111/dauliyah.v2i2.1359

Abstract

This article focuses on the continuity of Iranian ballistic missile programme afterJCPOA on 2015. The Author argues that the contiunity is related to theconventional arms dynamics which invloved Iran and Gulf Cooperation Council(GCC) countries. By applying action reaction theory, it concludes that themagnitude, timing, and awerness aspects in GCC modernization effort have asignificant impact on Iran decision to continue its ballistic missile programme.By using document analysis as collecting data method, author found many kindof data ilustrating the modernization gap between Iran and GCC and severaldocuments within journal articles and other sources have shown the Iranianthreat perception toward GCC as basis for action reaction model in Iran-GCCrivalry.
The National Counterterrorism Agency's Efforts to Improve Intelligence Institution Collaboration in Countering Terrorism in Indonesia Hidayat, Cecep; Zarkasyi, Fajar Imam
International Journal of Social Science and Religion (IJSSR) 2024: Volume 5 Issue 3
Publisher : Indonesian Academy of Social and Religious Research (IASRR)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53639/ijssr.v5i3.271

Abstract

Lack of intelligence collaboration is considered to be one of the fundamental problems in tackling terrorism in Indonesia. However, amidst the negative attention, there are efforts by BNPT (National Counterterrorism Agency) to improve collaboration between intelligence agencies. By using Weiss's theory to analyze various statements from public officials and state institutions regarding the issue of intelligence agency cooperation in Indonesia, this paper finds two important conclusions. First, efforts to encourage the formation of intelligence collaboration have actually been carried out by BNPT by equalizing perceptions among various intelligence agencies in viewing the problems and issues of terrorism. This is evidenced by a series of training conducted by BNPT in the period 2020-2023 which aims to encourage synergy between intelligence agencies related to terrorism issues. Second, still in line with what Weiss revealed, BNPT's steps with this series of training are inseparable from the external pressure sourced from public opinion in encouraging the formation of cooperation. In this case, the strong public demand for the importance of intelligence collaboration in dealing with the problem of terrorism is inseparable from the intensity of terrorism attacks that occurred from 2016 to 2021. The bomb attacks that occurred during this period led to polemics over the function of intelligence, which in turn shows the importance of intelligence collaboration as an important component of counterterrorism.
Pembentukan Literasi Digital Gen Z Berbasis Nilai Kearifan Lokal dalam Membendung Konten Propaganda Terorisme Siber Hidayat, Cecep; Effendi, Irmawan; Zarkasyi, Fajar Imam
JCIC : Jurnal CIC Lembaga Riset dan Konsultan Sosial Vol 7 No 1 (2025): JCIC: Jurnal CIC Lembaga Riset dan Konsultan Sosial
Publisher : CIC Lembaga Riset dan Konsultan Sosial

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51486/jbo.v7i1.200

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the role of digital literacy among Generation Z based on local wisdom values, in countering cyber terrorism propaganda content. As an active internet-using demographic, Gen Z is particularly vulnerable to exposure to radical content due to a lack of information filtering skills. Using a qualitative approach, the study reveals that local cultural values embedded in the “Jabar Masagi” program—such as Niti Surti, Niti Harti, Niti Bukti, and Niti Bakti—has a potential modality to enhance Gen Z especially high junior students’ ability to evaluate and filter information, ultimately preventing the spread of cyber terrorism propaganda. These findings highlight the importance of integrating local wisdom values into digital literacy programs as a preventative measure against online radicalization, as well as the need for collaboration among various actors (government, educational institutions, and communities) in developing holistic digital literacy strategies.
Moderasi Islam Sebagai Diplomasi Publik Arab Saudi di Indonesia Zarkasyi, Fajar Imam; Effendi, Irmawan
Jurnal ISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol. 20 No. 1 (2023): Jurnal ISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik
Publisher : Institute of Social and Political Science Jakarta (Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Jakarta - IISIP Jakarta)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36451/jisip.v20i1.10

Abstract

Sejak visi 2030 dideklarasikan, Arab Saudi berupaya keras membentuk citra sebagai negara modern khususnya di tengah negara barat. Akan tetapi, citra baru yang sedang dibangun Arab Saudi tersebut berpotensi merusak soft powernya yang telah terbangun di tengah dunia Islam. Moderasi Islam yang dipromosikan Arab Saudi dianggap sebagai upaya dalam menyeimbangkan antara citra modern yang sedang dibangun dengan citra keIslaman yang ingin dipertahankan. Citra sebagai negara konservatif dan lekat dengan paham Salafisme menjadi kontradiktif dengan narasi moderasi Islam yang ditawarkanya. Artikel jurnal ini bertujuan menjelaskan bagaimana moderasi Islam sebagai sebuah bentuk diplomasi publik Arab Saudi diimplementasikan di Indonesia. Melalui konsep diplomasi publik, terlihat bahwa pola Arab Saudi dalam mempromosikan narasi moderasi Islam di Indonesia menekankan upaya membangun dialog publik secara langsung. Hal itu dilakukan dengan aktif menginisiasi beberapa konferensi yang disponsori Arab Saudi dalam menyampaikan pesan-pesan moderasi Islam yang melibatkan cendekiawan, politisi, serta alumni di Indonesia.
Resiliensi Sebagai Faktor Desekuritisasi dalam Repatriasi Foreign Terrorist Fighters ke Indonesia Effendi, Irmawan; Fajar Imam Zarkasyi
Jurnal ISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol. 22 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal ISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik
Publisher : Institute of Social and Political Science Jakarta (Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Jakarta - IISIP Jakarta)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36451/jisip.v22i1.402

Abstract

Artikel ini melaporkan hasil penelitian tentang dinamika wacana pemulangan Foreign Terrorist Fighters (FTF) eks-Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) ke Indonesia yang berafiliasi dengan Jemaah Islamiyah (JI). Berbeda dengan kebijakan pemerintah terhadap FTF Suriah lainnya yang berafiliasi dengan ISIS. Pemerintah cenderung restriktif dan mempertahankan sekuritisasi penuh, terdapat indikasi bahwa eks-FTF HTS dipertimbangkan untuk direpatriasi. Dengan menggunakan model segitiga hubungan antara sekuritisasi, desekuritisasi, dan resiliensi yang dikembangkan oleh Bourbeau & Vuori (2015), penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa: (1) resiliensi dapat berfungsi baik untuk memperkuat sekuritisasi maupun mendorong desekuritisasi, (2) dalam kasus FTF eks-ISIS, resiliensi digunakan sebagai justifikasi untuk mempertahankan sekuritisasi karena ketiadaan struktur sosial domestik yang mampu memfasilitasi reintegrasi mereka, (3) sebaliknya, dalam kasus FTF eks-HTS, resiliensi yang tercermin dalam keberhasilan pemerintah mentransformasi Jamaah Islamiyah justru menjadi landasan bagi desekuritisasi FTF eks-HTS. Pemerintah Indonesia mempertimbangkan pemulangan eks-HTS karena terdapat mekanisme sosial yang dapat mengakomodasi mereka, berbeda dengan eks-ISIS yang tetap dipandang sebagai ancaman transnasional. Dengan demikian, penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa resiliensi bukan sekedar mekanisme adaptasi, tetapi juga alat politik yang dapat membentuk narasi keamanan negara
Religious Legitimacy and Extractive Politics: The Disarticulation of Human Security in Indonesia’s Mining Concessions Zarkasyi, Fajar Imam; Reynaldi, Dwiki Yulian; Shafar, Wildan Ilmanuarif
TEMALI : Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): TEMALI : Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/jt.v9i1.52060

Abstract

This study examines how religious legitimacy shapes and reorders human security discourse within policies granting mining concessions to religious organizations in Indonesia. It departs from the growing involvement of religious actors in extractive sectors and the resulting implications for the protection of people, the environment, and affected communities. Using a qualitative approach grounded in critical discourse analysis and the hegemony theory of Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe, the study analyzes state statements, elite pronouncements from religious organizations, and national media discourse through systematic coding and relational mapping with NVivo. The findings show that religious concepts—most notably maslahat—operate as a hegemonic nodal point that binds claims of development, welfare, moral obligation, and nationalism into a single chain of equivalence that stabilizes mining concession policies. Within this configuration, human security is not explicitly rejected; rather, it becomes disarticulated and reduced to technical and procedural concerns through the normalization of ecological risks, livelihood vulnerabilities, and social impacts as routine consequences of development. Furthermore, the involvement of religious organizations marks a transformation of religious roles from moral guardians to extractive actors through a mechanism of antagonism displacement, whereby structural conflicts between the state and citizens shift into internal moral debates within organizations. Theoretically, this study affirms that human security constitutes a contested discursive arena rather than a neutral normative framework. It contributes to extractive politics scholarship by demonstrating how religious authority can function as a hegemonic mechanism that stabilizes extractive development while marginalizing ecological and social protection.